Counterparties: Cliff Notes
Welcome to theÂ CounterpartiesÂ email. The sign-up page isÂ here, itâ€™s just a matter of checking a box if youâ€™re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints toÂ Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com.
The fiscal cliff (nĂ©e taxmageddon) has been looming for months — yet, as Binyamin Appelbaum says, it never got any real traction during the campaign. But now that the campaign is over, the issue is everywhere. After all, if Congress doesn’t act, weâ€™re headed straight for another recession, thanks to a mix of automatic spending cuts and expiring tax cuts. (For background, see our previous posts. The WSJ has a simple visualization of what’s in the fiscal cliff; Tracy Alloway flags a handy calendar, which includes when the debt limit will likely be reached).
Itâ€™s an old topic, but there are brand-new trial balloons! In a statement the NYT called Â ”conciliatory”, Speaker of the House John Boehner said his party would now be open to “new revenues” in exchange for entitlement cuts and/or tax reform. This may mean that Obama may be finally making progress in what Joshua Green calls the president’s long “battle for revenue”.
In the suddenly more pleasant world of post-election politicking there may even be something like common ground: Grep Ip and Peter Orszag both say that there might be short-term solutions which eases the economic pain of the fiscal cliff while giving Congress time to wrangle over the really hard budget decisions. (This is also known, in some circles, as â€śkicking the can down the roadâ€ť.)
The CBO today released a broad guide to three basic debt-reduction scenarios, while the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has another approach: aim a bit lower. Instead of obsessing over coming up with the “almost mythical” $4 trillion in cuts suggested by proposals like the Simpson-Bowles plan, why not cut half that and call it a day? A deficit reduction package that size, the CBPPâ€™s Richard Kogan writes, would stabilize our debt over the next decade and buy crucial time to evaluate how to properly cut health care costs — a question weâ€™re only beginning to answer.
Health care — Medicare and Medicaid but not social security — is, in fact, the biggest driver of our debt. As Aaron Carroll put it, “We don’t have a deficit problem, we have a health care spending problem”. Â – Ryan McCarthy
On to todayâ€™s links: