<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Counterparties: The non-industrious military complex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/01/30/counterparties-the-non-industrious-military-complex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/01/30/counterparties-the-non-industrious-military-complex/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:29:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WilliamCowie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/01/30/counterparties-the-non-industrious-military-complex/comment-page-1/#comment-45721</link>
		<dc:creator>WilliamCowie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=20347#comment-45721</guid>
		<description>Did the government move 4th quarter purchases into the 3rd quarter to window dress the U.S. economy numbers before the election? (After all, it was an unusual bump in military expenditures that made the Q3 numbers look as good as they did.)

Just asking...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the government move 4th quarter purchases into the 3rd quarter to window dress the U.S. economy numbers before the election? (After all, it was an unusual bump in military expenditures that made the Q3 numbers look as good as they did.)</p>
<p>Just asking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kailim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/01/30/counterparties-the-non-industrious-military-complex/comment-page-1/#comment-45716</link>
		<dc:creator>Kailim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=20347#comment-45716</guid>
		<description>Increase of export instead of keeping or increasing military spending is the growth the US needs. It is far more sensible and healthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Increase of export instead of keeping or increasing military spending is the growth the US needs. It is far more sensible and healthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FifthDecade</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/01/30/counterparties-the-non-industrious-military-complex/comment-page-1/#comment-45715</link>
		<dc:creator>FifthDecade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=20347#comment-45715</guid>
		<description>Cutting defence spending is a great way to reduce US Government debt - and with Saddam gone, bin Laden dead, and ten years after Bush optimistically ran with the line &quot;Mission Accopmplished&quot; surely it&#039;s about time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cutting defence spending is a great way to reduce US Government debt &#8211; and with Saddam gone, bin Laden dead, and ten years after Bush optimistically ran with the line &#8220;Mission Accopmplished&#8221; surely it&#8217;s about time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
