Counterparties: All loans are risky loans

By Ben Walsh
February 20, 2013

Welcome to the Counterparties email. The sign-up page is here, it’s just a matter of checking a box if you’re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints to Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com.

What if boring banking is actually dangerous? James Surowiecki, citing research by Christian Laux and Christian Leuz, argues that it wasn’t high finance that pushed banks to fail during the financial crisis. Instead, banks simply “lent themselves right into insolvency”. Anat Admati and Martin Hellwig make the case in their book, “The Banker’s New Clothes”, that traditional lending can be just as risky as more as complex trading strategies — it also didn’t help that banks borrowed excessively. Their solution: banks should fund themselves with more equity and less debt.

Tom Braithwaite thinks that’s already happened and that the desire to increase return on equity, which is well below its pre-crisis peak, will make banks safer. “They are channelled away from [riskier activities] because Basel III puts tough ‘risk weights’ on riskier businesses… safer businesses such as advisory work or retail brokerage are being preferred because they are ‘capital light’”. That placid view, however, is countered by the role that reducing risk-weighted assets seems to have had in spurring JP Morgan’s London Whale debacle.

Will the increased capital requirements of Basel III lead to less lending? Admati and Hellwig’s emphatic answer is that they won’t. In the short-term, the question’s moot: bankers, aside from a uptick in industrial and commercial loans, can’t seem to find anyone to to lend to. Elizabeth Dexheimer writes that new data from Credit Suisse shows the average loan-to-deposit ratio for the top eight commercial banks in the US fell to the lowest level in five years. That glut of deposits, Dexheimer reports, is the result of fewer customers wanting to take on loans and banks adopting more stringent lending standards. — Ben Walsh

On to today’s links:

Increments
China will tax carbon – at least a little bit, in a few years – Quartz

New Normal
Florida Atlantic’s University’s new football stadium sponsor: a private prison company – Chris Kirkham
Using Twitter to plagiarize a fake menu for a terrible celebrity chef’s restaurant – Gawker

Confessions
Erskine Bowles’ “Grand Bargain” formula: whatever is halfway between Democrats and Republicans – Ezra Klein

Nothing To See Here
DC’s less noticed revolving door: From regulator to influence peddler to staffer, and back again – Jesse Eisinger

EU Mess
French austerity is holding back growth – Sober Look

Investigations
Someone placed a very profitable $90,000 bet on Heinz just before it was acquired – Dealbook
Why the SEC may be overreaching – John Carney

Politicking
“There is no possible sequester deal to be made” – Kevin Drum
Sequester blame game in full swing – WaPo

Right On
What NYC can do to actually help startups (healthcare, tax credits, banks that don’t suck) – Choire Sicha

MF Doom
Regulators leaning towards the conclusion that Jon Corzine shouldn’t trade futures – NY Post

Hoarders
Americans are sitting on $9 billion in old, unused iPhones – MarketWatch

Says Science
We think, therefore we are selfish – Science

Comments
3 comments so far

Jeez, haven’t people heard of Gazelle.com?

Posted by Auros | Report as abusive

Awsome article and straight to the point. I am not sure if this is in fact the best place to ask but do you guys have any ideea where to employ some professional writers? Thanks in advance

Kimree is a world-leading e-cigarette company. According to Frost & Sullivan, Kimree was the second largest e-cigarette designer and manufacturer in the world in terms of both revenues and production volume in 2013. The Company designs and produces a broad range of e-cigarette products, including disposable e-cigarettes, rechargeable e-cigarettes and e-cigarette accessories. Visit http://www.kimree.com/ for more.

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/