It’s time to abolish the FHFA

By Felix Salmon
February 26, 2013

Remember the force-placed insurance scandal, which first came to light back in 2010? Well, despite being addressed in Dodd-Frank, the problem is still there: loan servicers are buying massively overpriced home insurance on behalf of homeowners, and getting enormous kickbacks from the insurers — if they don’t own the insurers themselves. The victims, here, are usually the investors who own the mortgages in question — which means that the biggest victims of all are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Fannie alone has seen its hazard insurance costs rise from around $25 million a year before the financial crisis to $631 million in 2012. That’s real money, and so Fannie came up with a plan to save hundreds of millions of dollars. Rather than paying through the nose for the most expensive insurance the servicers could find, Fannie decided to buy the insurance itself.

Fannie ran this idea past its regulator, FHFA, on February 17, 2012, reports Jeff Horwitz in another one of his fantastic articles on this issue today. Back then, the FHFA had no objections. So Fannie put out an RFP, asking 12 insurers for their ideas. The results can be seen here: the winner was a proposal from Overby-Seawell Company, which proposed a system anybody could join.

OSC excelled at program design, Fannie concluded. It had also pulled off a coup by partnering with Zurich Insurance, a Swiss reinsurer with a $400 billion balance sheet, a superior A+ rating from insurance rating company AM Best and historical experience in the force-placed market.

Zurich stood ready to take on all of Fannie’s business if necessary, but under OSC’s model any qualified insurer could take a piece of the GSE’s business by joining a consortium of carriers willing to divide Fannie’s risk. Among the proposal’s attractions were “market driven pricing,” and “one entity fully accountable to Fannie Mae and servicers,” Fannie documents state.

Fannie put thought into preventing excessive market disruption as well, the documents show. Incumbent insurers willing to match Zurich’s prices would be permitted to retain existing business. If they didn’t, banks could still hire them to administer force-placed programs. Insurers were also welcome to join the Zurich consortium.

Fannie showed OSC’s proposal to the FHFA on May 9, and again faced no objections. The “final project recommendations” were then run by the regulator on September 28, as well as on follow-up calls on October 12 and October 22. Everything was in place: the only thing left was formal FHFA approval.

Which never arrived.

Instead, faced with lobbying from the American Bankers Association and others, the FHFA vetoed the whole plan on February 8; once the news was made public, shares in the largest force-placed insurer, Assurant, immediately surged. At this point, Fannie’s plan seems to be definitively dead — replaced with a group of committees whose objective isn’t obvious and which have every incentive to drag things out.

The result is that Fannie has seen at least $150 million of savings evaporate — and homeowners are going to wind up overpaying even more, for insurance their servicers have chosen for them.

So, what does the FHFA think it’s playing at, here? It’s not exactly being forthcoming on the subject: a spokeswoman said only that “FHFA will work with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and key stakeholders… to address issues associated with force placed insurance,” although the FHFA’s Meg Burns has said that the regulator has no timeframe and no particular idea what approach it’s going to take on these issues.

I’ve heard of regulators being captured by the organizations they’re supposed to be regulating — that happens all too frequently. But the situation at the FHFA seems to be even worse: it looks as though it has been captured by the banks which are extracting rents from the regulated organizations.

Indeed, it’s hard to think of a single good reason why the FHFA should exist at all. By all means regulate Fannie and Freddie — but give that job to the same regulators who are in charge of overseeing all the other major financial institutions in the country. The FHFA has been useless and obstructive pretty much from day one, and this latest decision only serves to underscore how counterproductive it’s being. If the Obama administration can’t get rid of its head, Ed DeMarco, maybe it should just abolish the entire thing.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

FHFA regulates based on a “public utility model,” aiming to protect and preserve Freddie and Fannie’s ability to serve the mortgage market. The stress tests show that FnF can repay taxpayers in the next four to five years. The mortgage market continues to function. Underwater homeowners are getting some help, albeit not loan forgiveness.

The public utility model is typically implemented by a three to five member commission rather than a single regulator and there is a great deal of transparency regarding how and why the regulator makes its decisions. FHFA has room for improvement, but hysteria isn’t helpful.

Posted by fourcentson1 | Report as abusive

Surely this isn’t the same Eddie DeMarco who declined to allow principal reductions to middle class homeowners who went from +30% equity to -30% equity due to the collapse of 2007 because he wanted to avoid “moral hazard”.

He should get a soft cotton cloth and a tin of Brasso and spend the rest of his life polishing knobs. He can start with mine.

Posted by breezinthru | Report as abusive

Does anyone have figures on the market shares of the major servicers? Is there much overlap with mortgage lenders? this is just to get a sense of the players and dynamics going on in this market. My understanding is that the crisis had a significant impact on the industry structure but I haven’t seen figs recently.

Now onto the subject matter: can people get up in arms about sthg like this? Well no, most don’t get it and it’s not sthg that make easy slogan, which is a shame, but then again that is why all concerned (all benefiting rather) are happy to keep the status quo. Still, this is the sort of things that I find so unbelievable, so crazy, in god and free market worshipping America, yet this is a rigged market and yet the interests of the majority are being trampled over for the benefits of the few, often as in this case, profit maximize companies, who publicly proclaim their love of Adam Smith, but in reality much prefer ( and spent millions lobbying ) operating their own gov protected cartel. will sthg be done? Hopefully, maybe this blog is read by politicians willy to act, but I wouldn’t hold my breath.

Posted by fxtrader7 | Report as abusive

Ed DeMarco should have been removed 3 years ago.

he has single handedly blocked helped for millions of underwater homeowners as well as investors.

Preserving homeownership act of 2012
HARP 3.0
HAMP with principal Reduction
National Mortgage Settlement

Please completely abolish and close the FHFA and maybe the economy and housing can truly begin to recover.

Posted by hopeful1 | Report as abusive

Replace Ed Demarco already !!!!

Posted by hopeful1 | Report as abusive

Red bottom shoes are well known all across the globe. The original creator of these extraordinary style of shoes was Christian Louboutin. These days there are many companies that are making elegant women’s shoes, along with the distinct red sole. These types of shoes are one of the trendiest shoes around, which is apparent from their outstanding demand! Women love to shop for these cheap red bottom shoes, and these shoes usually are in demand during the time of year while they are at a price reduction. However, the common trend is that these shoes aren’t on a discount during the holiday seasons when people love to go shopping for themselves as well as their family.

Kimree is a world-leading e-cigarette company. According to Frost & Sullivan, Kimree was the second largest e-cigarette designer and manufacturer in the world in terms of both revenues and production volume in 2013. The Company designs and produces a broad range of e-cigarette products, including disposable e-cigarettes, rechargeable e-cigarettes and e-cigarette accessories. Visit for more.

Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the web the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get irked while people think about worries that they plainly don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people could take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks