Counterparties: Hoard of directors
Welcome to the Counterparties email. The sign-up page is here, itâs just a matter of checking a box if youâre already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints to Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com.
Some of the firmâs 13 directors make more than $500,000 because they have extra responsibilities… Goldmanâs board is the best compensated of any big American bank and the fifth-highest paid of any company in the country… Some of its rivals are not that far behind. The nationâs biggest banks paid their directors over $95,000 a year more on average in 2011 than what other large corporations paid.
A Goldman spokesman notes that director compensation is increasing because of the firmâs rising share price, but that fails to address the size of the initial equity award. As Felix has noted, the best way to pay directors is to emulate how Warren Buffett does it, giving them âa modest four-figure sumâ.
Despite (or because of) their exorbitant compensation, oversight from directors at US banks was largely nonexistent in the run-up to the financial crisis. Now banks insist that because of increased legal risks and time requirements, largely resulting from the financial crisis their boards did little to mitigate, they have to pay top dollar to attract qualified directors. But the caliber of bank board members is hardly awe-inspiring. Take JP Morgan: none of the directors on the boardâs risk committee has worked at a bank or as a financial risk manager.
Itâs not just bank boards that have problems. James Stewart details just how hard it is to get rid of directors, even after theyâve made boneheaded decisions. Despite running the company like a âtawdry reality TV showâ, with disastrous financial results, each member of the HP board was re-elected last month. HP isnât an isolated case, either. Stewart cites statistics from Institutional Shareholder Services showing that of 17,081 director nominees at US companies, only 61, or 0.36%, failed to get support from a majority of shareholders last year.
Barclaysâ new chairman, David Walker, is trying to make his pay more defensible: heâll be working at least four days a week to overhaul the board he leads, albeit on a $1.17 million annual salary. Walker is at least committing to do more than dial-in to the odd conference call, and show up to vote yes on managementâs decisions once a quarter. Working more is the other way to make your work-to-pay ratio more defensible. — Ben Walsh
On to todayâs links:
The simple, boring reason why disability insurance has exploded: demographics – Brad Plumer
Why you should care about a divergence in two main inflation indicators – Greg Ip
The remarkable persistence of US economic growth, 1790-present – Conversable Economist
And, of course, there are many more links at Counterparties.Â