Counterparties: A surplus of cuts

By Ben Walsh
April 11, 2013

Welcome to the Counterparties email. The sign-up page is here, it’s just a matter of checking a box if you’re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints to Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com.

President Obama’s 2014 budget was released yesterday; Wonkblog has a concise rundown of its winners and losers. The plan aims to cut $1.8 trillion in spending while raising $580 billion in revenue over ten years. To the considerable dismay of liberals, it includes cuts to Medicare and a reduction in Social Security cost-of-living increases.

Despite these cuts, Annie Lowrey writes that the President’s budget zeroes in on the twin problems of inequality and wage stagnation by increasing the federal minimum wage, instituting free preschool, and making the five-year extension of the earned income tax credit permanent. Sam Stein and Ryan Grim, however, see a budget full of old stimulus ideas that likely won’t pass.

The deficit is already shrinking rapidly. Bill McBride points to a Goldman Sachs research report estimating that in the first three months of 2013, the federal deficit was 4.5% of GDP — less than half its 2009 level. Dan Gross thinks that even though current policy is “nobody’s idea of optimal”, we are experiencing a “golden age of deficit reduction”.

The budget also includes several major changes to the tax code, including the often discussed “Buffett Tax”, which would impose a 30% minimum tax on household income over $1 million. Private equity managers won’t be pleased either: the budget would kill the “carried interest” tax break. John Carney says this is futile; Dan Primack has a good rebuttal.

Simon Johnson isn’t pleased. He sees a president who “has allowed the debate to become dominated by excessive paranoia about deficits and by extremist demands to shrink government”. As Derek Thompson writes, the President is proposing between $200 billion and $380 billion more in Social Security and Medicare cuts than Republicans are asking for. Jonathan Chait thinks the reason Obama is proposing these cuts has everything to do with politics: the president wants to beat Republicans to the punch on spending cuts and deficit reduction. – Ben Walsh

On to today’s links:

EU Mess
Buiter on Europe: It’s “extraordinary that so much political power rests with unelected technocrats” – Euromoney
Of course, Cyprus is a template for the future of Europe – Pawel Morski

Investigations
How the Feds caught a former KPMG exec giving out inside info: A golf course sting – DealBook

TBTF
Big bank details just how much more valuable big banks would be if they were broken up – Bloomberg

Financial Arcana
The latest hot trade on Wall Street: swaps that lower banks’ capital requirements – Susanne Craig
Regulators are starting to fight back against “needless corporate complexity” in the banking sector – WSJ

Educational
The problem with America’s schools isn’t about spending – Josh Barro
From ’93-’09, US universities added bureaucrats 10 times faster than they added tenured faculty – Businessweek

Awesome
“Accountants are cowboys of information”: David Foster Wallace on accounting – Zach Seward

Billionaire Whimsy
Collect art or keep control of your family’s company? – Ben Walsh

Trends
The state of financial services: generally so so, unless you work in equities – eFinancial Careers

Opinions
“I’m not an economist…” – Choire Sicha

JP Morgan
Was Ina Drew “heinously greedy or heinously incompetent”? – Cathy O’Neil
Dimon calls the London Whale trades “stupid” in annual letter to shareholders – JP Morgan

WTF
“Google Glass: a cure for rogue traders” – American Banker

Startups
Foursquare, with just $2 million in revenue, raises $41 million from top VCs – Businessweek

And, of course, there are many more links at Counterparties.

More From Felix Salmon
Post Felix
The Piketty pessimist
The most expensive lottery ticket in the world
The problems of HFT, Joe Stiglitz edition
Private equity math, Nuveen edition
Five explanations for Greece’s bond yield
Comments
2 comments so far

Yes – This president is not “beating the republicans to the punch” by giving more than they asked for. And by so doing, he has signaled to the vacuous demagogues of the right that they need to pile on and hate him more, because if they do, he will give them even more.

This president has pre-emptively bent over and lubricated himself for the republicans from day one. His problem is that he has made his way in the world by embracing racists – that has taught him to be fawning toward people that hate his guts in order to appease them. It has worked for him.

But that is also why this president works so very effectively against his own constituency and the values he professes to care about. He is such an utterly spineless Stepin Fetchit character that he is now the worst enemy liberals and moderates have ever had – bar none. This president is the antithesis of FDR. He leads the charge for those who hate him and what he stands for against his own. Not a fighting bone in his body – not even as a lame-duck president with nothing to lose.

Posted by BrPH | Report as abusive

The google glasses idea seems to be that we could find more needles if we dumped a bunch more hay on the stack. There is nothing they would catch that current monitoring techniques do not already implicitly capture; the problem is that the data currently being monitored is already so expansive that the valuable parts are buried amongst the quotidian.

Posted by dWj | Report as abusive
Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/