Counterparties: A surplus of cuts
Welcome to the Counterparties email. The sign-up page is here, itâs just a matter of checking a box if youâre already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints to Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com.
President Obamaâs 2014 budget was released yesterday; Wonkblog has a concise rundown of its winners and losers. The plan aims to cut $1.8 trillion in spending while raising $580 billion in revenue over ten years. To the considerable dismay of liberals, it includes cuts to Medicare and a reduction in Social Security cost-of-living increases.
Despite these cuts, Annie Lowrey writes that the Presidentâs budget zeroes in on the twin problems of inequality and wage stagnation by increasing the federal minimum wage, instituting free preschool, and making the five-year extension of the earned income tax credit permanent. Sam Stein and Ryan Grim, however, see a budget full of old stimulus ideas that likely wonât pass.
The deficit is already shrinking rapidly. Bill McBride points to a Goldman Sachs research report estimating that in the first three months of 2013, the federal deficit was 4.5% of GDP — less than half its 2009 level. Dan Gross thinks that even though current policy is ânobodyâs idea of optimalâ, we are experiencing a âgolden age of deficit reductionâ.
The budget also includes several major changes to the tax code, including the often discussed âBuffett Taxâ, which would impose a 30% minimum tax on household income over $1 million. Private equity managers wonât be pleased either: the budget would kill the âcarried interestâ tax break. John Carney says this is futile; Dan Primack has a good rebuttal.
Simon Johnson isnât pleased. He sees a president who âhas allowed the debate to become dominated by excessive paranoia about deficits and by extremist demands to shrink governmentâ. As Derek Thompson writes, the President is proposing between $200 billion and $380 billion more in Social Security and Medicare cuts than Republicans are asking for. Jonathan Chait thinks the reason Obama is proposing these cuts has everything to do with politics: the president wants to beat Republicans to the punch on spending cuts and deficit reduction. â Ben Walsh
On to todayâs links:
The latest hot trade on Wall Street: swaps that lower banks’ capital requirements â Susanne Craig
Regulators are starting to fight back against “needless corporate complexity” in the banking sector â WSJ
And, of course, there are many more links at Counterparties.