Counterparties: Central banks vs austerity
Welcome to theÂ CounterpartiesÂ email. The sign-up page isÂ here, itâ€™sÂ just a matter of checking a box if youâ€™re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints toÂ Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com.
Both the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank will meet this week, and theyâ€™re expected to continue their current policy, which BloombergÂ describes as â€śflooding the world with cash.â€ť Bloomberg also cites an estimate from Barclays that central banks will buy $2.5 trillion in assets this year â€“ more than twice the amount purchased in 2012. This week, the ECB may lower interest rates to 0.5%, although itâ€™s far from a done deal, according toÂ Reuters. The Fed, Jon Hilsenrath reports, is likely to keep its rates at their current level.
There are a number of voices concerned that fiscal policy (read: austerity) has made monetary policy less effective.Â Mike Konczal writes:
If you look at macroeconomic policy since last fall, there have been two big moves. The Federal Reserve has committed to much bolder action in adopting theÂ Evans Rule and QE3. At the same time, the country has entered a period of fiscal austerity. Was the Fed action enough to offset the contraction? Itâ€™s still very early, and economists will probably debate this for a generation, but, especially after theÂ stagnating GDP report yesterday, it looks as though fiscal policy is the winner.
Paul Krugman largely agrees, saying that, â€śas a practical matter the Fed â€” while it should be doing more â€” canâ€™t make up for contractionary fiscal policy in the face of a depressed economy.â€ť
There are still those who believe in the power of the central bank. Economist David BeckworthÂ â€” whoÂ proposed back in 2011 that the Fed do exactly what it has been doing over the past six months â€” says Konczal and Krugman undersell how well monetary policy has worked. He points to nominal GDP, which has been steadily growing since austerity measures began in 2010 (though slower than before the crisis).
Nouriel Roubini has also chimed in, arguing that whatever the Fed does from here forward will likely be a problem. â€śThe exit from the Fedâ€™s QE and zero-interest-rate policies will be treacherous: Exiting too fast will crash the real economy, while exiting too slowly will first create a huge bubble and then crash the financial system,â€ť he says. â€“Â Shane Ferro
On to todayâ€™s links:
Possibly Useless Data
New study finds Google Trends may be a useful stock-picking tool â€“ Nature
Back in 2010, the same researchers found Google Trends couldn’t predict stock market fluctuations â€“ Science
And, of course, there are many more links at Counterparties.