Counterparties: Split personalities
Welcome to the Counterparties email. The sign-up page is here, itâs just a matter of checking a box if youâre already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints to Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com.
Institutional Shareholder Servicesâ message is clear: no one man should have all that power.
More specifically, ISS has declared Jamie Dimon shouldnât be JP Morganâs chairman and CEO. The firm, which advises shareholders on corporate voting, is also recommending that its clients not support the reelection of three of the bank’s directors. Each of those directors — David Cote, James Crown and Ellen Futter — sits on the bankâs risk committee. The proposal to split the roles of chairman and CEO is non-binding; the re-election of board members is binding. Itâs unclear whether either measure will pass.
The risk committee, whose oversight failed spectacularly prior to and during last yearâs $6.2 billion trading loss, has no members who have worked at a bank or as financial risk managers. ISS called the committee membersâ âlack of robust industry-specific experienceâ odd, particularly compared to their counterparts at JPMâs competitors.
The WSJâs Francesco Guerrera wrote last month that the era of the âimperial chief executiveâ might be winding down on Wall Street. The trend goes beyond finance. Boeing and GE faced (and defeated) proposals to split the roles of chairman and CEO this year. With shareholders demanding more scrutiny of management, the âcurrent Wall Street incumbents are likely to be the last ones to hold a dual roleâ.
Dimon does have at least one high profile shareholder on his side. Warren Buffett says he is â100% for Jamie… I couldnât think of a better chairmanâ, which is no surprise to Jonathan Weil. JP Morgan and Berkshire Hathaway share a director (Stephen Burke), and Buffett is a JP Morgan shareholder. The avuncular investor is also chairman and CEO of his own company, but tellingly, that wonât continue past his lifetime.
Shareholders may be able to take comfort in executivesâ discomfort. One study found that âcompanies that had separated the two roles received a 28-percent higher five-year returnâ. – Ben Walsh
On to todayâs links:
The era of austerity is over, according to the French finance minister – Bloomberg
“There probably will not be any major changes in Europe until after Merkel’s reelection” on Sept. 22 – Calculated Risk
The Supreme Court under Roberts is the most business-friendly court since WWII – NYT
“How business fares in the Supreme Court” – Minnesota Law Review
MBIA, Bank of America reach legal settlement -Â Reuters
Are stock buybacks in the interest of shareholders or CEO bonuses? Both. Maybe. – WSJ
âBuybacks are an efficient way of returning money to shareholders of a shrinking companyâ – Felix
And, of course, there are many more links at Counterparties.