Chart of the day, Fed-tightening edition

By Felix Salmon
June 29, 2013
Gavyn Davies's excellent post on Fed tightening, which ought to be required reading for all members of the FOMC.

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

ftblog491b.png

This chart comes from Gavyn Davies’s excellent post on Fed tightening, which ought to be required reading for all members of the FOMC. He demonstrates the effect of the Fed’s tapering warnings in two ways: by showing that the expected short-term interest rate in mid-2016 is now about 100bp higher than it was at the beginning of May; and also, with the chart above, by showing that the market is now expecting rates to start rising much earlier than it had previously anticipated.

This chart isn’t, strictly, a tapering chart: it shows when people expect the Fed to start raising interest rates, rather than slowing down on QE. But that all-important first rate hike now has a 65% probability of taking place in 2014, according to the market — up from less than 15% in the NY Fed’s April survey.

Which raises the trillion-dollar question: given that the Fed hasn’t changed its messaging on rate hikes at all, what has caused this enormous change in expectations? Davies explains:

The markets have rationally taken the Fed statements on tapering as a signal that their thinking on monetary policy is changing. This signal of Fed intentions may be more powerful than the other forms of forward guidance they have given about their intentions.

There is evidence that this signalling effect of Fed balance sheet changes might be very powerful. If the Fed is not willing to “put its money where its mouth is” by buying bonds, then the market might take its promises to hold short rates at zero less seriously than before. According to this recent research by the San Francisco Fed, it is possible that a sizeable proportion of the total effect of QE on bond yields came from these signalling effects rather than the portfolio balance effects which have usually been emphasised by the central banks.

Put another way, you and I and Ben Bernanke might think that QE works because when you drop money from helicopters and that money is used to buy bonds and take them out of circulation, the price of those bonds goes up and their yield goes down. But in fact, the main reason that yields fell has nothing to do with the mechanistic consequences of buying bonds — as generations of investors have found out, buying up assets generally has only a very short-term and modest effect on the price of those assets.

Rather, QE turns out to be a surprisingly effective way of signalling to the market that rates are going to stay at zero for a very long time. And when you say that QE isn’t likely to stay in place much longer, the market takes that as tantamount to saying that rates are not going to stay at zero for nearly as long as they had thought.

Think about it this way: there is a nominal zero lower bound on rates. But there is a way for policymakers to be more accommodative than simply setting rates at zero: they can switch from “rates are at zero for the time being” to “rates will stay at zero for the foreseeable”. The markets don’t like taking words at face value, however: they want to see the Fed putting its money where its mouth is. As a result, when the Fed starts saying that it’s going to taper, the market sees rates rising again.

Fed officials are desperately making a concerted attempt to tell the markets that they’re wrong, but history tells us that when policymakers rail against the markets, the markets smell blood and often end up turning out to be right. The markets don’t care about “forward guidance”; they consider the Fed’s deeds to be more important than its words. As a result, so long as the Fed says that tapering is on the horizon, we’re never going to return to the interest rates we were seeing just a month or two ago.

3 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

One thing people need to recognize is the difference between real economic growth and the Fed propping up the economy artificially. If them tapering back on the QE causes this much of a reaction it indicates that people don’t have that much faith. Obviously it was going to happen at some time, we just didn’t have an exact date. Now the time is here and everyone wants to act like the sky is falling.

Posted by AliceWalker | Report as abusive

Rates are unlikely to go as low as the were last year or even last month no matter what the Fed does at this point. There was clearly more at work there than QE. I know its odd to think that that’s more to the market than the Fed, but it’s true. Treasury rates were pushed down to record lows in part by renewed fears in Europe, and rates were already rising again well before the Fed said anything about tapering. The Fed accelerated a trend that was already underway, it didn’t change the course of the market.

Posted by Moopheus | Report as abusive

I can see that you are adding a new many work directly into your blog. Maintain publishing the great work. Some actually helpful tips in that room. Bookmarked. Pleasant to discover your site. Thank you!