Comments on: Elliott vs Argentina: It’s not over yet http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/08/23/elliott-vs-argentina-its-not-over-yet/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: traduceri romana daneza http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/08/23/elliott-vs-argentina-its-not-over-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-53752 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:05:49 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=22372#comment-53752 It’s genuinely very complicated in this busy life to listen news on Television, therefore I just use web for that purpose, and obtain the latest news.

]]>
By: jacobcepstein http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/08/23/elliott-vs-argentina-its-not-over-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-47917 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:22:28 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=22372#comment-47917 “poltroonish pusillanimity”

]]>
By: yamal http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/08/23/elliott-vs-argentina-its-not-over-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-47914 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 01:18:26 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=22372#comment-47914 Felix: I’m afraid this case is actually not that important other than the hysteria the Argentina apologists are trying to create around it. What is notable in the language of the decision is that the focus is very much on Argentina’s continued malfeasance. In not proposing anything other than a silly remedy, nothing other than this response could be expected. As to the pari passu issue, again, the only precedent that will be established is that if a country goes rogue, there may be consequences. If you’ve seen the recent Grenada/Taiwan decision, you can see that justices will not just apply Argentina as a precedent. There is no danger to the international sovereign debt markets, only to countries that attempt to skirt the laws of the countries whose capital markets they choose to use.

]]>
By: yamal http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/08/23/elliott-vs-argentina-its-not-over-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-47913 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 01:18:22 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=22372#comment-47913 Felix: I’m afraid this case is actually not that important other than the hysteria the Argentina apologists are trying to create around it. What is notable in the language of the decision is that the focus is very much on Argentina’s continued malfeasance. In not proposing anything other than a silly remedy, nothing other than this response could be expected. As to the pari passu issue, again, the only precedent that will be established is that if a country goes rogue, there may be consequences. If you’ve seen the recent Grenada/Taiwan decision, you can see that justices will not just apply Argentina as a precedent. There is no danger to the international sovereign debt markets, only to countries that attempt to skirt the laws of the countries whose capital markets they choose to use.

]]>