Comments on: Hank Paulson, hero? A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 By: DickShepJCNJ Wed, 18 Sep 2013 01:14:23 +0000 Caught that current Bloomberg magazine cover of Paulson trying to look like some kind of beleaguered tough-guy poor heroic Hank under siege but toughing out his super-lucrative Post-Treasury/Post Goldman idle time…

Plus his kissy-face interview with his fully-disclosed good buddy Charlie Rose, along with the very weaselly Bloomberg magazine editor plus the equally in-the-Paulson-tank documentary director.

Seems there’s a Hanky Paulson p.r. clean-up campaign underway, “poor tough Hanky saved the planet” back in 2008 when really he just happened to be the guy who had Congressional members always seeking post-gov’t jobs and lucrative post-Gov’t careers/consultancies trying to stay on Hanky’s good side.

To this day, as the NY Post’s John Crudele reminds and attempts to gain access to the gov’t docs. How Hanky during the crucial days in SEPT/OCT 2008 spent numerous – scores – of yet-undisclosed/undefined phone conversations with his Goldman Sachs CEO successor, Lloyd Blankfein. Gee, wonder what these two apparent connivers were talking about that no one else knew, or likely won’t ever know?

Then there was the disgusting image of Hanky-boy joking about how he literally – literally – knelt at the expensively-shod feet of then-House-Speaker Nancy Pelosi as Hanky-boy desperately sought unimaginably huge sums of taxpayer funds and almost singular control over same.

And ol’ Hanky-boy wasn’t so shameless to seem to seek direct bailouts for Goldman and his other banking buddies (except of course Dickie Fuld, whom evidently Hanky-boy had some sort of snitty disdain for).

No, Hanky didn’t seek direct bailouts for his banking buddies. Instead, he coyly and Pelosi-foot-kissingly sought to bailout the bankers’ COUNTERPARTIES, mainly AIG, and that way, AIG took the heat and Goldman et al and some of Hanky-boy’s other favorites got bailed.

As an ardent FREE-MARKET advocate, it’s increasingly disgusting to see these kinds of oligarchic set-ups whereby you have Wall Street heavyweights revolving into and out of high, super-influential gov’t offices. Robert Rubin, Jacob Lew, Timothy Geithner, Paulson, and a truly cretinous exemplar of the breed: Jon Corzine.

On top of everything else, these “hotshots” like to run around claiming they’re the “smartest guys in the room,” yeah, it’s easy to be “smart,” when you have access to untold sums of that other slimey favorite tactic, “other people’s money” – especially taxpayers. And another Hanky-boy tactic is to come across as some kind of mumbling, down-home aw-shucks humble little me. Like Corzine, Lew, Rubin et al instead he is a relentless practitioner of taking often senseless risks with other peoples’ funds.

These “smart guys,” increasingly put not just the economic health of the nation at risk, they’re inviting the kind of oppressive regulation that risks curtailing the free-market’s highest ideals and benefits.

And let’s not even get started about how a lot of these cats belong in jail for long periods of time. And keep in mind in China, and self-described “Chinese expert” Hanky-boy should realize this. In China, they sometimes SHOOT those convicted of rank corruption. DickSheppard-Jersey City, NJ

By: RS108 Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:55:39 +0000 This is the reason why the US is in decline. It has created an elite that has entrenched itself. It dominates the media and keeps the poor poor. The American dream–class mobility–is dead.

By: Trillium2 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:37:56 +0000 You don’t even have to be a fancy economist to know when someone screwed up. That is the beauty to this that Paulson and his spin doctors just don’t get. Either Paulson was inept and took the job based on his ego and put the nation at risk or he let his buddies walk with their pockets full. Both a fail. It seems that Paulson didn’t understand so much on this….apparently he didn’t get that the bankers were greedy so he negotiated like a little girl and let them keep their big salaries AND bonuses. He says he had no idea about all the sleazy banking stuff that was impending but you had to be a complete idiot to not know if you were in commercial banking at all. They use his wife as a way to endear us to it all and well wasn’t Mrs. Jerry Sandusky clueless too? But probably not nearly as wealth. Mrs Paulson has over 500 million reasons to be supportive. The S & L scandal years earlier sent 1,000 bankers to jail. Not one of the commercial bankers are in jail. How can that be when MILLIONS of Americans lost their homes, jobs and hope? Obama and his special prosecutor also let the bankers walk and many close to the cases have left D.C. in disgust never to get involved again. The prosecutor is now working for one those who was being investigated. HO hum that is how America rolls today. These guys play by different rules for sure and I will not be watching this documentary on my Netflix nor will I download the book to my Kindle. I would advise others not to let the producers or any of this profit from all this propaganda on Paulson. Like many who get old they get religious and try to hedge their bets and rewrite history. They get all warm and fuzzy and do gooding. Paulson’s name and legacy is crap and will stay that way. No amount of book tours or movies is going to change what really happened. People will remember. I kind of think Paulson is a traitor in many respects, he put us all at great risk.

By: KyleDexter Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:06:24 +0000 Hank Paulson was a Wall Street insider that saved Wall Street. We should have let some of the banks fail. Now we have more debt as a nation, some zombie banks that are now huge, and a new economy that is reliant on less jobs!!

By: ShaunyP26 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:30:25 +0000 To the guy above me, so by your logic an expensive corporate welfare bill that benefits a tiny elite is better than a longish, less expensive bill that helps a much higher percent of the population? That’s some twisted logic. Are you sure you aren’t Hank Paulson defending yourself?

And who cares if he gave to charity. Murderous drug lords and all sorts of shady characters give to charity. It’s one of the easiest ways to disinfect your awful deeds in life.

By: y2kurtus Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:27:49 +0000 If you had to make the false choice between the 3 page 750 billion dollar TARP bill and the Health care bill which runs thousands of pages which do you think would be better legislation?

Secondly you mention Hank’s big windfall from Goldman… I would argue that when someone is dynastically wealthy like Paulson or Bloomberg and they elect to enter public service rather than spend the rest of their life enjoying fine food and fast women… that’s pretty admirable in my book… plus I think he’s one of the all time largest donors to the nature conservatory.