<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ANALYSIS-Big traders face &#8216;landmine&#8217; in CFTC energy rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/financial-regulatory-forum/2010/02/17/analysis-big-traders-face-landmine-in-cftc-energy-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/financial-regulatory-forum/2010/02/17/analysis-big-traders-face-landmine-in-cftc-energy-rule/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:29:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: otc123</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/financial-regulatory-forum/2010/02/17/analysis-big-traders-face-landmine-in-cftc-energy-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>otc123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/financial-regulatory-forum/?p=6594#comment-604</guid>
		<description>In no sense is this a &quot;landmine,&quot; &quot;buried deep in the proposal.&quot;  There is a clear pointer to it on page 3 of the Q &amp; A, and it was referred to at many points in the public meeting at which the proposal was discussed:  

http://www.cftc.gov/newsroom/cftcevents/2010/oeaevent011410.html

-- and hey, what&#039;s to stop these large, international financial houses from actually reading the proposal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In no sense is this a &#8220;landmine,&#8221; &#8220;buried deep in the proposal.&#8221;  There is a clear pointer to it on page 3 of the Q &amp; A, and it was referred to at many points in the public meeting at which the proposal was discussed:  </p>
<p><a href='http://www.cftc.gov/newsroom/cftcevents/2010/oeaevent011410.html'>http://www.cftc.gov/newsroom/cftcevents/ 2010/oeaevent011410.html</a></p>
<p>&#8211; and hey, what&#8217;s to stop these large, international financial houses from actually reading the proposal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otc123</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/financial-regulatory-forum/2010/02/17/analysis-big-traders-face-landmine-in-cftc-energy-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>otc123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/financial-regulatory-forum/?p=6594#comment-601</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nonsense to call this provision a &quot;landmine.&quot;  It figures clearly even in the Q&amp;A, let alone the proposal itself.  

Are we really being asked to believe that these large traders can&#039;t read, and don&#039;t have lawyers on their staff to do their reading for them?  

Reuters staff should do their homework before parroting this nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nonsense to call this provision a &#8220;landmine.&#8221;  It figures clearly even in the Q&amp;A, let alone the proposal itself.  </p>
<p>Are we really being asked to believe that these large traders can&#8217;t read, and don&#8217;t have lawyers on their staff to do their reading for them?  </p>
<p>Reuters staff should do their homework before parroting this nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
