Financial Regulatory Forum

Bernanke defends Fed small bank supervision role

March 18, 2010

   By Mark Felsenthal
   WASHINGTON, March 17 (Reuters) – Top U.S. central bankers present and past on Wednesday joined forces against a plan to strip the Fed of its oversight of smaller banks, saying the knowledge it gains from that role is vital to monetary policy.
   U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke urged lawmakers to reconsider an element of a Senate regulatory overhaul bill that would shift supervision of thousands of banks to other regulators.
   “The insights provided by our role in supervising a range of banks, including community banks, significantly increase our effectiveness in making monetary policy and fostering financial stability,” he told the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee.
   Former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker joined Bernanke in defending the Fed’s role in supervising smaller firms.
   “The Fed’s regional roots would be weaker and a useful source of information lost,” he said. Volcker is now an economic adviser to the Obama White House.
   Lawmakers have heaped criticism on the institution for oversight lapses that contributed to the worst financial crisis in generations. Congressional proposals to overhaul financial supervision could redistribute regulatory powers among different regulatory agencies.
   Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, who has called the Fed’s regulatory performance in the run-up to the crisis an “abysmal failure,” proposed in November stripping the central bank of its bank oversight powers.
   Revised legislation he unveiled on Monday would allow the Fed to oversee banks and important financial firms with assets greater than $50 billion.
   However, the measure would pull the Fed out of supervision of more than 5,000 smaller bank holding companies and state-chartered banks, handing those responsibilities to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. For more see [ID:nN15221993].
   Bernanke argued that small banks provide the Fed with an important window into financial conditions throughout the nation’s economy.
   “We are quite concerned by proposals to make the Fed a regulator only of the biggest banks, making us essentially the ‘too big to fail’ regulator,” he said. “We want to have a connection to Main Street as well as to Wall Street.”
   The 11 regional Federal Reserve Banks outside Washington and New York would likely see their responsibilities shrink if the Fed no longer oversees smaller banks.[ID:nLDE62G1EZ].
   Regional Fed banks have come under fire because many of their directors are chosen by banks, leading to charges of regulatory conflicts of interest. Bernanke acknowledged the perception exists but said it is not grounded in reality.
   However, he said the Fed would be open to changes in the way regional Fed bank boards are selected.
   Public resentment at the government’s bailout of large financial institutions and anger over a deep recession have helped make regulatory reform a top priority for the Obama administration and lawmakers in a midterm election year.
   Passage of financial reform legislation is uncertain in the Senate where many Republicans remain opposed to the measure Dodd has unveiled.
   The House has passed a bill that would leave the Fed in charge of supervising smaller banks.
   But the House measure contains a provision which the Fed strongly objects to that would allow Congress to review the Fed’s monetary policy decisions — a provision that is not in Dodd’s proposed bill.
   Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said he expects lawmakers to meet to meld the House and Senate bills in April or early May.
  For a text of Bernanke’s prepared testimony, see: [ID:nN17148192] ((For more stories on Fed policy, please double click on [FED/AHEAD])) (Reporting by Mark Felsenthal; Editing by Kenneth Barry) ((mark.felsenthal@thomsonreuters.com; Tel: +1 202 898 8329; Reuters Messaging: mark.felsenthal.reuters.com@reuters.net)) Keywords: FINANCIAL REGULATION/FED 
  
Wednesday, 17 March 2010 23:52:08RTRS [nN17144210] {C}ENDS

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •