Financial Regulatory Forum

U.S. regulators urge firms to improve business continuity and disaster recovery plans

By Guest Contributor
August 21, 2013

By Stuart Gittleman, Compliance Complete

NEW YORK, Aug.21 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) – Futures and securities firms should review their industry-wide and internal business continuity and disaster recovery plans to improve responsiveness to significant disruptions and reduce recovery time, their regulators said Friday in a staff advisory.

Brokers face a fight asking the SEC to end exchanges’ SRO structure

By Guest Contributor
August 14, 2013

By Nick Paraskeva, Compliance Complete contributing author

NEW YORK, Aug. 14 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - Wall Street has asked regulators to consider ending the special supervisory status given to exchanges, saying that new technology such as dark pools and algorithmic trading has led to broker-dealers directly competing with exchanges for market share.

Cybersecurity and the board: avoiding personal liability — Part III of III: Policies and procedures

By Guest Contributor
August 8, 2013

By Steven L. Caponi, Thomson Reuters Accelus contributing author

NEW YORK, Aug. 8 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - In the previous two installments of this series (Part I and Part II), we discussed the fiduciary obligation of officers/directors to proactively address cyber security and the legal basis for holding them personally liable if they fail to do so. This third and final article explores the more difficult task of deciding which best practices directors should consider adopting. Because each enterprise faces unique challenges, this process requires that directors understand their company’s cyber security risk profile and the options available for mitigating the risk.

Cybersecurity and the board of directors: avoiding personal liability — Part II of III

By Guest Contributor
August 6, 2013

By Steven L. Caponi, Compliance Complete contributing author

NEW YORK, Aug. 6 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - The first article in this three-part series discussed how legal principles governing directors’ fiduciary duties may be applied to cybersecurity and the risks posed by cyber attacks. To summarize, Delaware’s corporate law places an affirmative obligation on fiduciaries to keep informed of serious risks facing the enterprise. The failure to exercise appropriate oversight in the face of known risks constitutes a breach of the duty of loyalty, a breach that cannot be exculpated under 8 Del. C. §102(b)(7).

Cybersecurity and the board of directors: avoiding personal liability – Part I of III

By Guest Contributor
July 25, 2013

By Steven L. Caponi, Contributing author for Compliance Complete

NEW YORK, July 25 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - The likelihood of a cybersecurity breach hitting one’s company in the near future is as certain as will be the resulting drop in shareholder value, finger pointing, fines, regulatory headaches and civil litigation alleging the board was asleep at the wheel in the face of a known danger. In a letter to the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission from five U.S. senators, including Commerce committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, the Senators noted:

Cybersecurity in Canada: Finance industry, government seek ways to share data

By Guest Contributor
July 18, 2013

By Daniel Seleanu, Compliance Complete

TORONTO/NEW YORK, July 18 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - More cooperation with government intelligence agencies would improve the Canadian financial industry’s cyber security capabilities, regulatory and industry experts told Thomson Reuters. Financial institutions have deployed defences, but face considerable threat from cyber-criminals intent on committing fraud, stealing sensitive information, and disrupting their networks.

U.S. regulators’ Basel III rules package signals intent to maintain momentum in big-bank reforms

By Guest Contributor
July 17, 2013

By Bora Yagiz

NEW YORK, July 17 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - In a move considered to be the most complete overhaul of U.S. bank capital standards since Basel I in 1988, three U.S. banking regulators (the Federal Reserve Board, Office of Comptroller of the Currency, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) have finalized the three Basel III-related notices of proposed rulemaking (NPRs) from 2012 on capital rules.

CORRECTED: Bank regulators globally add AML to safety and soundness issues

By Guest Contributor
July 8, 2013

By Nick Paraskeva, for Compliance Complete

NEW YORK, July 8 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - Bank regulators around the globe are increasingly focusing on anti-money laundering (AML) and operational risks as part of their role in overseeing institutional safety and soundness. This follows huge enforcement fines imposed on systemically important banks by regulators and justice ministries. It also reflects a concern that any attendant hit on a bank’s reputation could affect its ability to obtain short-term funding or trade other than on a fully-secured basis.

COLUMN: When cheating lands brokers on the street

By Guest Contributor
July 5, 2013

By Suzanne Barlyn, Reuters

NEW YORK, July 5 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - One would think that aspiring financial professionals would have learned not to cheat on tests long before setting their sights on Wall Street, but not everyone got that memo.

Compliance Insight: UK regulators gain more power over overseas firms and individuals

By Guest Contributor
July 3, 2013

By Jane Walshe, Compliance Complete

LONDON/NEW YORK, July 3 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - The new regulatory structure that came in to being on April 1, 2013 introduced changes not just to the form of regulation, but also to its substance, including extensive new powers over unauthorised parent undertakings with operations on UK soil.  (more…)