Ending the era of bank bailouts
The following is a guest post by Cornelius Hurley, director of the Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law at Boston University School of Law, and a former assistant general counsel to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. The opinions expressed are his own.
As Scott Brown and Barney Frank hash out the difference between a tax and an insurance premium, it’s important to return to the very basics of banking. Banks are in the business of buying and selling money.
They buy money as deposits and other borrowings. They sell it as loans and investments. If someone with deep pockets is foolish enough to guarantee a bank’s deposits and borrowings, that bank can buy money more cheaply. Further, if that person gives his guarantee for free, the bank would have a competitive advantage.
If I told you that an elite class of banks has found such a fool to guarantee their debts, you’d probably want to know who it is. Well, it’s you and me, the taxpayers.
Then you’d want to identify the elite banks so that we could cut off the guarantee, or at least begin charging them for what we’re giving away. Does “too big to fail” ring a bell?
We have to come to grips with the fact that TBTF banks are taking us to the cleaners. Ridiculously, we continue to subsidize them. But there is a clear solution to this problem:
First: identify all the TBTFs. They are: Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo. Lest you think the list is arbitrary, be aware that the vaunted credit rating agencies (Moody’s and S&P) have already rated these firms according to the likelihood of their receiving “support,” i.e., a taxpayer subsidy.
Second: calculate the amount of the subsidy received annually by each firm. Again, this is a straight-forward mathematical exercise, called “notches,” the credit rating agencies award to them. The amount dwarfs any of the levies discussed thus far.
Third: require each bank to create a line item on its balance sheet called the “subsidy-reserve” into which goes the annual amount of subsidy it receives from taxpayers. This “subsidy reserve” will be available in the case of bankruptcy but it will not count as capital for regulatory purposes.
Fourth: require that the only way the reserve can be returned to shareholders is in connection with a divestiture or a spin-off of a line of business by the TBTF bank. Otherwise, it accumulates over time.
U.S. financial regulators stake out turf defenses
By Kevin Drawbaugh WASHINGTON, July 24 (Reuters) – Senior U.S. financial regulators defended their turf in remarks to be delivered on Friday at a congressional hearing on the Obama administration’s sweeping regulatory reform agenda. (more…)
Hi.
I want to read more.
………
Debt Consolidation Advice
US’s Geithner- will work with Congress, but regulatory overhaul essential
WASHINGTON, July 24 (Reuters) – U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said on Friday he was willing to work with lawmakers on shaping an overhaul of financial regulations but insisted major changes are necessary. The financial crisis of the past two years show the financial system “failed in its most basic responsibility” to supply credit and protect consumers and that cannot happen again, he said in prepared testimony for delivery to the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Committee. (more…)
U.S. FDIC wants limits on consumer finance agency authority
WASHINGTON, July 24 (Reuters) – The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp on Friday argued for limits on a new agency to protect consumers from risky financial products and warned against stripping consumer protection duties from bank regulators. (more…)
Fiat wins EU clearance to buy Chrysler
BRUSSELS, July 24 (Reuters) – The European Commission on Friday unconditionally approved the purchase of bankrupt U.S. automaker Chrysler LLC by Italy’s Fiat SpA, saying the transaction would not damage competition in Europe. (more…)
“Fed fatigue” weighs on Obama regulatory push
WASHINGTON, July 23 (Reuters) – The Obama administration wants to hang a new shingle over the U.S. Federal Reserve’s marble-columned door that says “systemic risk regulator.” But many lawmakers, from both parties, aren’t feeling very confident about the Fed. It’s an issue surrounding a central part of President Barack Obama’s plan to overhaul financial regulation and it prompted skeptical comments at a Senate hearing on Thursday. (more…)
Obama team asks Congress to combine bank regulators
By David Lawder and Patrick Rucker WASHINGTON, July 23 (Reuters) – The U.S. Treasury Department on Thursday sent Congress a plan that would consolidate two federal bank regulators in a move it said would help prevent lenders from seeking the loosest oversight. (more…)
U.S. SEC approves two firms to clear credit-default swaps
WASHINGTON, July 23 (Reuters) – ICE Clear Europe and Eurex Clearing AG have been given permission to clear credit default swaps, a type of derivative that exacerbated the global financial crisis, the Securities and Exchange Commission said on Thursday. (more…)
Mexico faces huge revenue gap, tax overhaul planned
By Jason Lange MEXICO CITY, July 23 (Reuters) – Mexico will have to cut spending and raid its rainy day savings to cover a 480 billion peso ($36.6 billion) hole blown in government revenues by the recession, Finance Minister Agustin Carstens said on Thursday. (more…)
Swiss clinch deal as it seeks to shed tax haven label
ZURICH, July 23 (Reuters) – Switzerland’s Finance Ministry said on Thursday that on drafting an agreement with Finland it had brought to 12 the number of tax deals initialled in efforts to be removed from an international “grey list” of tax-havens. (more…)










Financial Regulatory Forum
This article is excellent, it points out banks are in business for profit and gamble with the tax payer money.
This seems to be a major hurdle in reform, as we do not have the political will to say no to bail outs.
i.e., we have no objection to the banks management betting the firm on a profit and loss scheme; after all it is the bank share holder’s cash.
However, the concept and implementation of bailouts is to say the least flawed logic.