Financial Regulatory Forum

The U.S. JOBS Act and non-U.S. companies: changes to the offering process and compliance challenges

By Robert Evans, Thomson Reuters Accelus contributing author

NEW YORK, May 8 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) – In April 2012, the U.S. securities laws changed significantly with the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, also known as the JOBS Act. The JOBS Act is deregulatory, easing some of the rules for companies seeking to access the U.S. capital markets. The offering process for SEC-registered IPOs is changing as a result and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission staff is working on further rule changes. Publicity restrictions will be eased for private placements and Rule 144A offerings. Offerings of up to $50 million will be exempted from registration. These changes pose interesting compliance challenges.

NON-U.S. COMPANIES ACCESSING U.S. CAPITAL MARKETS

Non-U.S. companies accessing the public U.S. equity capital markets for the first time after December 8, 2011 may benefit from the JOBS Act changes. To qualify, a company must have annual revenues of less than $1 billion. Issuers in this new category are called emerging growth companies (EGCs). The most significant changes to the securities offering process for EGCs include:

    Communications: A company making a public offering in the United States and its underwriters are strictly limited by the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 in their ability to communicate about the offering. No offers, written or oral, are permitted before a registration statement is filed with the SEC. Only oral offers, or offers made with a compliant prospectus, are permitted after filing but before the registration statement is declared effective. Under the JOBS Act, EGCs, directly or through representatives they authorize, may now test the waters with qualified institutional buyers (QIBs) and institutional accredited investors (IAIs). That is, without violating the pre-filing and waiting period restrictions, they may communicate with those potential investors to gauge whether they might be interested in an SEC-registered securities offering. EGCs and underwriters that test the waters remain subject to potential securities law liability for those communications, including for any material misstatement or omission. As a result, issuers and investment banks are likely to be cautious in testing the waters. Communications will be oral (which can include use of slides or flip books that are not left with investors). If written materials are used, they will likely be limited to information from the registration statement. Because the JOBS Act creates a limited carve-out to the Securities Act restrictions on communication, there will be compliance challenges. For example, market participants will need to ensure that testing the waters communications are limited to QIBs and IAIs and only used in offerings by EGCs. Also, investors may have to agree to treat information confidentially to avoid market abuse and selective disclosure concerns. Confidential submission of registration statements: In December 2011, the SEC staff severely limited access to confidential submission of registration statements, which had been available to all first time non-U.S. issuers that qualified as foreign private issuers. The JOBS Act gives that access back to issuers that qualify as EGCs prior to pricing of their first SEC-registered sale of equity securities. EGCs are required to include the initial confidential submission and all confidentially submitted amendments as exhibits to a publicly filed registration statement no later than 21 days before the road show. The December 2011 SEC staff policy still allows some non-U.S. issuers to confidentially submit draft registration statements if they meet the conditions outlined in the policy and either are not EGCs or do not take advantage of any benefit available to EGCs. Draft registration statements submitted confidentially must be substantially complete at the time of initial submission, including exhibits and a signed audit report covering the fiscal years presented in the registration statement. Financial statements and selected financial data: An EGC need only provide two years of audited financial statements in its initial public offering of common equity securities registered with the SEC, rather than the three years that are generally required. Instead of five years of selected financial data, an EGC need only present selected financial data for periods beginning with the earliest audited period presented in its IPO registration statement. Although the JOBS Act only refers to the disclosure rules for U.S. domestic issuers, EGC foreign private issuers may follow these reduced disclosure requirements. Research reports: The JOBS Act makes it easier for investment banks to write research reports about EGCs. Pre- JOBS Act and under the current rules for non-EGCs, underwriters in an IPO cannot publish research in advance of the IPO or during a 40-day quiet period after pricing and may not publish research for 15 days before and after the release or expiration of any lock-up agreement. There are also restrictions limiting contact between bankers and research analysts designed to separate investment banking from research in investment banks.

The JOBS Act:

    exempts broker-dealer research reports on EGCs before, during or after common equity offerings of an EGC (including an IPO) from being considered an offer or a prospectus under the Securities Act; permits broker-dealers to write research on EGCs after their IPOs (so no 40-day quiet period) and before the expiration of IPO lock-up agreements; and allows research analysts to communicate with management in connection with the IPO of an EGC even if investment bankers are present.

In practice, however, major investment banks seem unlikely to change their research practices much, though the quiet period may be 25 days instead of 40. The flexibility provided by the JOBS Act may be limited by the restrictions imposed by the Global Research Analyst Settlement in 2003 and concerns over 10b-5 liability.

CHANGES TO ONGOING REPORTING OBLIGATIONS

The JOBS Act reduces SEC reporting and other requirements for EGCs until they cease to be EGCs. A company cannot be an EGC if it conducted its U.S. IPO on or before December 8, 2011. A company that has annual gross revenues (the Division of Corporation Finance April 16, 2012 FAQs say that “total annual gross revenues” means total revenues as presented on the income statement under U.S. GAAP (or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), if used as the basis of reporting by a foreign private issuer). If a foreign private issuer prepares its financial statements in a currency other than U.S. dollars, it can use the exchange rate as of its most recent fiscal year-end) of less than $1 billion that qualifies as an EGC will be an EGC until the earliest of:

PREVIEW-Rulemakers plan global overhaul of lease accounting

By Emily Chasan

NEW YORK, Aug 15 (Reuters) – U.S. and international accounting rule makers are planning to propose an overhaul of lease accounting as soon as Tuesday, in a move expected to affect some $1.2 trillion in leased assets.

(more…)

It looks like Plan B for accounting convergence

Full convergence of US and international accounting standards appears to be some way off, and while International Accounting Standards Board member Philippe Danjou is still aiming to achieve Plan A – meeting the G20 deadline of full convergence by mid-2011 – a compromise Plan B is clearly being prepared, John Manley writes. (more…)

IASB: single set of accounting rules on track

By Huw Jones

LONDON, March 16 (Reuters) – The world’s top accounting bodies are on track to thrash out a common set of rules by the middle of next year, the International Accounting Standards Board said on Tuesday.

The G20 group of countries set the ambitious deadline last year to make it simpler for cross-border companies and investors but differences over how to value some complex assets have raised concerns about the timetable.

Last month the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said it would commit to a new work plan that would delay any move to international standards until at least 2015.

Global accounting body told to improve governance

By Huw Jones

LONDON, Feb 8 (Reuters) – The world’s most influential accounting rule setter is not answerable enough to users or the public and must improve its governance further, top financial regulators said on Monday.

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) rules are used in over 100 countries, including the European Union, with Canada, Japan and Brazil adopting them as well. The United States, however, is still mulling its position.

The IASB will become more powerful next year when its rules form the basis for a single set of global standards as called for by the G20 group of countries, sparking calls for the London-based body to be more accountable and transparent.

INTERVIEW-Plan B may keep accounting convergence on track – IASB

By Huw Jones

LONDON, Jan 18 (Reuters) – A patch-up solution to keep the goal of a single global accounting system on track may be needed due to differences over how standard setters are reforming a rule blamed for amplifying the credit crunch.

Two rival accounting systems could feature extra disclosures allowing analysts to make comparisons between different fair value rules, the chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), David Tweedie, told Reuters Insider.

The G20 group of leading countries has set a mid-2011 deadline for converging the world’s main accounting rules.

Global accounting rule-setter proposes quicker booking of bad loans

By Huw Jones
LONDON, Nov 5 (Reuters) – A global accounting standard setter published on Thursday a second leg of proposals to replace its fair value rule that was criticised by policymakers for amplifying the credit crunch.

(more…)

U.S. SEC to review accounting rules roadmap

By Huw Jones
BASEL, Switzerland, Oct 8 (Reuters) – The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission will review by the end of the autumn its milestones for possible adoption of a global set of accounting rules, its chairman Mary Schapiro said on Thursday.
(more…)

EXCLUSIVE-U.S., global differences over fair-value accounting can be reconciled – IASB chief

tweedie_thb By Emily Chasan
NEW YORK, Oct 6 (Reuters) – Proposed changes to mark-to-market accounting rules are likely to look similar on both sides of the Atlantic in the end, despite a current controversy about how far to expand the rules, the top global accounting rulemaker said.

(more…)

International accounting board rejects U.S. “fair value” rule plans

By Huw Jones
LONDON, Sept 30 (Reuters) – The top accounting rule setter said on Wednesday that U.S. plans to widen the scope of a rule blamed for amplifying the credit crunch was unacceptable, raising doubts over a 2011 deadline for a global set of accounting rules.

(more…)

  •