Financial Regulatory Forum

JPMorgan’s massive spending on controls underlines “aggressive” relations with regulators

By Guest Contributor
September 24, 2013

By Henry Engler, Compliance Complete

NEW YORK, Sept. 24 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - What was once a more consultative relationship between JPMorgan and its regulators has turned into an environment of aggressive demands to reshape the banking giant, say bankers.

Mortgage lawsuit against JPMorgan offers refresher on basic compliance lessons

By Guest Contributor
October 3, 2012

By Stuart Gittleman

NEW YORK, Oct. 3 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - Securities issuers that claim to have conducted due diligence on their offerings should address and remediate problems found and not ignore red flags, as made clear by the New York state fraud lawsuit against JPMorgan over they way its Bear Stearns unit dealt in mortgage securities. (more…)

Beyond the numbers: do banks manage risk?

By Guest Contributor
June 14, 2012

By Rachel Wolcott

LONDON, June 14 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - It may seem like a subtle difference, but most of what banks call ‘risk management’ is often more akin to ‘risk measurement’. It is a myth that banks are in possession of fancy gadgetry that allows them to measure risk on a minute-by-minute basis from a specialised risk-control tower and react to it effectively, thus averting catastrophe. Instead, the financial crisis and trading losses, such as JPMorgan’s $2 billion blow-up in May, have shown that by the time banks measure and understand their risks, it is too late. Risk management is not about controlling risk, but about offsetting its impact after the fact.

Offshore U.S. oversight of derivatives may bolster defenses against JPMorgan-type losses

By Guest Contributor
May 29, 2012

By Nick Paraskeva

NEW YORK, May 29 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) – U.S. regulators are looking to use new their oversight authority over foreign derivatives trades to reduce the chances of new shocks such as JPMorgan Chase & Co’s trading loss of at least $2 billion.

JPMorgan case puts Volcker Rule and SIFIs back in the spotlight

By Guest Contributor
May 23, 2012

By Patricia Lee

NEW YORK, May 23 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) – The massive losses which resulted from JPMorgan Chase hedging its positions against derivatives has once again cast the spotlight on the Volcker Rule and whether systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) are too big to fail, industry observers said. Questions have also been raised about the firm’s hedging strategy, and what constitutes hedging in the first place.

Investor group seeks JPMorgan governance changes

By Guest Contributor
May 18, 2012

By Emmanuel Olaoye

NEW YORK, May 18 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) – A labor-backed investor group critical of JPMorgan Chase & Co’s corporate governance said the bank has failed to address concerns over its risk oversight and it will try to rally other shareholders for changes after a $2 billion trading loss.

JPMorgan AGM punctured by thorny hedge issues

By Guest Contributor
May 17, 2012

By Christopher Elias

LONDON/NEW YORK, May 17 (Business Law Currents) - JPMorgan’s disastrous $2 billion hedge loss has raised some thorny issues on management oversight, corporate governance and the effectiveness of the Volcker Rule, as division at the banking giant’s annual general meeting highlight a growing tension between its shareholders and management.

JPMorgan repeats basic mistakes managing traders, say officials

By Guest Contributor
May 15, 2012

By Rachel Wolcott

LONDON/NEW YORK, May 15 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) – JPMorgan’s Chief Investment Office, which last week was responsible for more than $2 billion in mark-to-market losses, appears to have made some classic mistakes in the risk management of trading desks and the monitoring of traders. Although the CIO losses have not been blamed on a rogue trader, they do have much in common with the incidents at UBS and Société Générale, where single traders lost billions seemingly overnight.  (more…)

JPMorgan may tip Wall Street’s hand on ploys to beat Volcker

By Guest Contributor
May 14, 2012

By Rachel Wolcott

NEW YORK, May 14 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) - JPMorgan Chase & Co’s revelation that it had trading losses of at least $2 billion on a failed hedging strategy may have tipped the hand to one way Wall Street executives plan to get around the Volcker Rule.

A letter to JPMorgan: Dimon is wrong -COLUMN

June 15, 2011

By Anat Admati, guest columnist. The views expressed are her own

PALO ALTO, California, June 15 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) -

Dear JPMorgan Chase Directors

I own some JPMorgan Chase (JPM) shares through mutual funds in my retirement account. I have read Mr. Dimon’s recent letter to shareholders and some of his public comments. I write to urge you to reconsider JPM’s actions related to capital regulation. For the overall economy, as well as for JPM, these actions are misguided. (more…)