Financial Regulatory Forum

U.S. compliance officers need clarity on status as ‘supervisors,’ industry professionals say

By Stuart Gittleman

NEW YORK, May 8 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) – The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s dismissal of failure-to-supervise proceedings against a broker-dealer’s general counsel did little to ease compliance officers’ concerns over their potential for acting in a supervisory capacity, according to leading industry professionals.

In January the SEC in a one-one split dismissed charges against the lawyer, Theodore Urban, for failing to prevent, detect and stop a stock fraud conducted by a registered representative at the broker, Ferris Baker Watts, and a customer of the firm. (more…)

Regulatory forbearance looms as next big supervisory risk for financial giants

By Susannah Hammond

LONDON/NEW YORK, Sept. 9 (Thomson Reuters Accelus) – Regulatory forbearance is not a concept that has hit many headlines. It is, however, emerging as an underlying theme in publications by a range of bodies, from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to the European Union and beyond. Regulatory forbearance is not about supervisory incompetence but, rather, the potential for a fully briefed regulator to decide not to intervene. There may be many legitimate occasions when non-intervention is the right call but, when judged with the benefit of hindsight, more supervisory interventions, made sooner, could have ameliorated some of the worst of the issues arising out of the financial crisis.

As Bank of England governor Sir Mervyn King stated, taking away the punchbowl when the party is in full swing is never an easy decision to make. Regulators, however, must be both capable and willing to take tough interventionist action. Regulators making such difficult decisions need to be assured that they have the backing of the international financial services community, the support of their domestic political masters and, perhaps to a lesser extent, the understanding of the public.

(more…)

  •