<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study examines clout of Iowa, NH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2007/12/05/study-examines-clout-of-iowa-nh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2007/12/05/study-examines-clout-of-iowa-nh/</link>
	<description>Tracking U.S. politics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: L Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2007/12/05/study-examines-clout-of-iowa-nh/#comment-333905</link>
		<dc:creator>L Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2007/12/05/study-examines-clout-of-iowa-nh/#comment-333905</guid>
		<description>I think the question of Iowa's representation of the country is a good one.  Without a doubt, as 'diversity' is typically defined, Iowa is not diverse.  I think it is very moderate in many ways, though, and I think this is good.  As an Iowa resident, I am undoubtedly biased, but one has the impression here that so many voters make their decisions annually and by listening as opposed to in groups or by party affiliation.  I like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the question of Iowa&#8217;s representation of the country is a good one.  Without a doubt, as &#8216;diversity&#8217; is typically defined, Iowa is not diverse.  I think it is very moderate in many ways, though, and I think this is good.  As an Iowa resident, I am undoubtedly biased, but one has the impression here that so many voters make their decisions annually and by listening as opposed to in groups or by party affiliation.  I like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
