<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain is choosy about his movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/01/19/mccain-is-choosy-about-his-movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/01/19/mccain-is-choosy-about-his-movies/</link>
	<description>Tracking U.S. politics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/01/19/mccain-is-choosy-about-his-movies/#comment-336075</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/01/19/mccain-is-choosy-about-his-movies/#comment-336075</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul.  That is all....

Well I'll also say:

I'm surprised I found something to actually agree with McCain about though, There Will Be Blood should be seen for many reasons.  One is the sensational powerhouse Daniel Day-Lewis who probably does more to prepare his characters in film than any other actor in the buisness--and shows it.  It's also a very well made film. 

No Country For Old Men is a drug for a tightly cut rigid plot thread blood-thirsty audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul.  That is all&#8230;.</p>
<p>Well I&#8217;ll also say:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised I found something to actually agree with McCain about though, There Will Be Blood should be seen for many reasons.  One is the sensational powerhouse Daniel Day-Lewis who probably does more to prepare his characters in film than any other actor in the buisness&#8211;and shows it.  It&#8217;s also a very well made film. </p>
<p>No Country For Old Men is a drug for a tightly cut rigid plot thread blood-thirsty audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Its_Personal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/01/19/mccain-is-choosy-about-his-movies/#comment-335911</link>
		<dc:creator>Its_Personal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/01/19/mccain-is-choosy-about-his-movies/#comment-335911</guid>
		<description>It's really interesting to see how the media, including yourself, spins the Nevada results.  It was clearly a split decision as Hillary won more "votes" but Obama won more delegates.  Reuter's reporting isn't accurate reflecting that fact, which further skews future voter's impressions towards momentum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really interesting to see how the media, including yourself, spins the Nevada results.  It was clearly a split decision as Hillary won more &#8220;votes&#8221; but Obama won more delegates.  Reuter&#8217;s reporting isn&#8217;t accurate reflecting that fact, which further skews future voter&#8217;s impressions towards momentum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
