RICHARDSON, Texas - Republican candidate John McCain has had trouble winning over some of his party’s conservatives, who suspect that deep down he’s not one of them. On Thursday, McCain may have confirmed their suspicions with a slip of the tongue.
“I’m a proud conservative, liberal Republic…,” McCain said before catching himself.
“Conservative Republican,” he said deliberately, as the crowd at a brand-new Texas Instruments manufacturing plant laughed. “Hello, easy there. Let me say this: I am a proud conservative Republican, and both of my likely opponents today are liberal Democrats.”
The Arizona senator had another gaffe later on when he described how he will take on the eventual Democratic nominee.
“It’ll be dispirited,” he said. “It’ll be spirited. Because there are stark differences.”
Click here for more Reuters 2008 campaign coverage
Photo credit: REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi (McCain takes a question at Texas Instruments on Thursday)

Trackback
53 comments so far
Previous | 3 | 2 | 1 | Next
Admittedly, I’m not a Republican, but I do question whether Michaels has accurately captured the Republican “philosophy”. In my humble opinion, it works like this –
Republican/Conservatvies basically say “Trust me; I am the leader; I’ve thought about this, and I know more than you do; I will quickly make a decision, it may have flaws, but on balance you know I’m right, and by proceeding quickly and confidently, we will have a head start on the problem (or our enemies, if applicable).”
Democrat/Liberals basically say: “This is a big tent, and we want to make sure that everyone’s issues are considered. This may make our decision-making process slower than the Republicans, and it may make us sound less confident, but it also means that everyone’s views will be considered, and everyone will feel inoolved in the decision”
With that in mind, I think tht Michael is wrong — to have a larger Republican tent would be to turn them into Democrats — the idea of discussing the merits of various positions and reaching consensus just isn’t in the Republican playbook. If you have to think about the problem and reach a “considered” decision, then you are wasting valuable time, at least by Republican standards.
Of course, it hasn’t always been that way, but at least since the Republican “Contract with America” of the early 1990s, it seems that Republicans have established a set of principles that guide all decisions (and greatly slim-down the decision-making process), while Democrats still talk about(and sometime agonize over) how to do things.
I think that the problem that the right-most of conservatives have with McCain is that they recognize this “Cede all decision making to your standard bearer” concept, and, for the first time in at least 20 years, they aren’t sure that the decision maker is following the same set of principles as they are. They don’t want him to “invite them into the discussion before he makes his own decision”; that would be way to “Democrat”. They still value the “I know best, and I’ll be decisive” philosophy that we associate with Republicans, but they fear that McCain’s decisiveness will allow more immigrants, might raise taxes, etc., etc.
- Posted by ForrestSo Repubs are “patriots of American Democracy first and foremost”, eh? Well, you sure have had a lousy way of showing it the last 7+ years…
- Posted by ArchiesBoySo,what is wrong with “ultra conservatism”? What you moderates call ultra was acceptable mainstream Republicansim just 20 years ago. And, when we look at where our country has gone in the past 20 years, maybe it is time we Republicans begin thinking once again in terms of conservatism.
Quite frankly, I would encourage the moderates and liberals to go over to the Democratic party and support Obama/Clinton. You moderates apparently like the idea of a Socialistic State with a huge centralized federal government. You think that “health care for all” is a good idea, but, it is the door opener to Socialized medicine in the United States. You moderates probably support an immediate withdrawal from Iraq and other parts of the middle-east and to expose Israel to attack from the Hamas and Hezbollah and the total chaos that would ensue if we were to cut and run.
The moderates (centrists), are the ones who are corrupting the established principles of our conservative values.
Granted, the President of the United States is the president of all the people, but, we, the electorate must stand on solid principle and adhere to the core beliefs of the Republican Party. Senator John McCain is a moderate to liberal candidate. When are we going to learn that a president who is moderate and reaches across the aisle to work with liberals, we, the conservatives lose every time. Liberals are like a cancer. They keep eating away at core conservative values and eventually conservatism in America succumbs to the Marxist ideology of the left and ultimately, all Americans will suffer the horrors of liberalism in America.
Governor Mike Huckabee is and has been the only true voice for conservatism in this primary campaign, but, as evidenced by the biased media, radio talking heads and the Club For growth incessant attacks on Mike Huckabee, we will end up succumbing to the liberal’s agenda. Thank you moderate Republicans for your unprincipled support of John McCain. We shall pay dearly in November.
- Posted by Larkin G. MeadThe modern republican party has nothing to do with being conservative. Anyone claiming this is a hypocrite.
- Posted by Michael B.McCain “100 years in Iraq”, “…there will be other wars” is a disaster for the Republican Party. I’m one of those limited government conservatives that have stuck with this party through thick and thin.
No more! Party has trumped principles and I see no turning back. The GOP is dead to me.
- Posted by McWarmongerConservatives will eventually rise again. This is just a cycle. It’s happened in other countries - just look a France. The trouble is, a Democrat is going to win this time - adopt socialized health care - and we will never get rid of it. It will bankrupt us.
- Posted by Jeff“find another tent.”
Indeed. The Republican Party was born of the break-up of the Whig Party over the slavery issue, and the modern day Republican Party can suffer the same fate. The warfare/welfare policy of empire so popular with McCain, Giuliani, and Romney is not sustainable.
- Posted by logicprobeThe Christian conservatives have hijacked the Republican party. They live by imposing their values on the rest of the country. It’s time the Republicans started over and built their coalition on pragmatism and steadfastness.
- Posted by ashYou say this as you speak ill of conservatives. Perhaps you don’t realize it, but a Republican tent without conservatives won’t win any elections either. While we find another tent, you probably want to find a new message as well. The Republican party will not survive without conservatives. If it does, it won’t be in power for awhile. And who will you blame for the problems when conservatives are gone?
- Posted by XMcCain has already lost the election. If you can’t convince your friends that you’re the right man for the job, what hope do you have with all the others?
- Posted by ScottMichael,
Speak English. What you mean is, “we should all vote Republican, right or wrong.” Which is a bit robotish, but pretty clearly your entire point.
Personally, I don’t care for democrats either (one party is filled with self righteous crooks, the other party is too) but I do enjoy Barack Obama’s, uhm, versatility. He doesn’t seem to be speaking to one crowd (white rich men who enjoy blowing up brown people, white women over eighty who like that you have a vagina). I dunno who will win in 08, but if I were a betting man, I’d say loyalty is overrated and what we need is more free thinkers.
Wait, was that your point?
- Posted by RobertThese slips of the tongue are more indicative of campaigning-fatigue. McCain isn’t a young man and these past 6+ months have taken a toll on him. Cut the old man a break!
- Posted by WayneMichael,
I hear ya! All those right-wing nut jobs on the radio and tv have become much too powerful for their own good. They live in complete isolation from the issues facing the everyday Republicans (i.e. paying the mortgage, paying for heat, securing and working a job, etc.).
Larry
- Posted by LarryWe should be careful about voting for or against someone strictly because of party affiliation. What matters in the end is the policy and plans of the individual elected to office. I would rather vote for a winner and lose, than vote for a loser and win.
- Posted by JeffreyMcCain is a LIBERAL…what’s his stance on major issues?
- Posted by BillHear! Hear!
Time to clean out the big tent of these rabble rousers.
McCain speaks to the core, and he’s the next best thing to a re-animated Ronald Reagan.
- Posted by billI’m an independent. Michael’s words make the first sense I’ve heard coming from a Republican. YOU ARE RIGHT, Mike. What you said applies to ALL parties and to independents like me. We are all in this highly political society together. We have to live with one another, or kill somebody. There are TOO MANY voices on the fringe inciting “my way or the highway” thinking. There is no highway. I choose life, and have for 77 years.
- Posted by "JR"Wow. I can’t wait for Obama v McCain. It should be a bigger blowout than Clinton v. Dole. You know it, I know it, and the American people know it.
- Posted by williampeace
Not everyone who generally votes Republican will be motivated to support McCain, as was the case with both Bushes, and Reagan, and every election. If candidates like McCain draw less support than usual from Republicans at election time, the party will learn to avoid “moderate” “mavericks” who are willing to run as vice-presidents on a Democratic tickets (i.e. Kerry/McCain 2004).
- Posted by GeorgeIt’s time for our Ultra conservative brethren to clearly understand that they are not and never have been the only elephant under the REPUBLICAN tent. If they can’t get on-board the Straight Talk Express at the convention, then perhaps it is time they find another tent.
As patriots of American Democracy first and foremost; We Republicans must never shy away from internal debate, critical perspectives and plurality of opinion. However we must also balance the books of this forum against the test of our American Democracy to define both our direction and chart our course of action in unity. We must be steadfast and weary of the intentions and ultimate purpose of any group that places its claims, its agenda or itself above that of our democratic majority system. This is what Ronald Regan meant by “Thou shall not speak ill of another Republican”. So Mr. McCain, you should be prepared to hold the exit door open for Rush and the rest if they can’t or simply won’t abide by these bedrock fundamentals of our Democracy and our party.
- Posted by Michael