Senator Clinton went to bosnia-true

The country was a war zone-true

I am sure there were some worries about sniper fire-true

It happened over 20 years ago-true

So she walked instead of ran to her van- false

The objection of her speaking about this experience was to exemplfy that she traveled to bosnia and other countries-true

She traveled to over 80 countries and her presence alone was loved internationally. true

Who knows what she might have informed by the government? true

Maybe the cia and fbi told her to be cautious.

So the lie was basically that she walked instead or ran to her van true

That’s what all is about?

Obama voters are so immature.

Please do one of your truth analysis on Obama.

1. he initially lied about his ministers statements on TV and later admitted he had heard the remarks in his speech.

2. He lied on the campaign trail on passing a bill into that actually is still stuck in committee.

3. On the campaign trail, he used the same bill as an example of how he stood up to corporate interests, but his bill is actually an example of how he caves in to his large contributors - in this case EXELON and their execs who contribute and who fundraise (see NOv. 2006 issue of Harpers)

4. Obama is disingenous about his registed lobbyist congtributors. He took money from “individuals” who are registered washington lobbyists right up to the time he announced for a presidential run. He still can and does take money from the family of “registered lobbyists”. He takes money form state level lobbyists and he makes use of that campaign finance loophole “bundlers”.

5. In his speech in on MLK day he spoke about how President Kennedy helped his father get from Kenya to Hawaii in 1959 via an airlift that Kennedy started. Apparently, this is not accurate. Kennedy did not come up with the idea for the airlift. Kennedy contributed to a subsequent airlift in 1960.

6. And as far as Obama’s claim that he apparently was a result of his parents’ union at the 1965 Selma march: That, too, isn’t possible — without a time machine, Obama was born in 1961. This is waht Obama said - Apparently Obama also said the following: “There was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, Alabama, because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born. So don’t tell me I don’t have a claim on Selma, Alabama. Don’t tell me I’m not coming home to Selma, Alabama.”

6. We all know that Obama did not tell the truth about his campaign meeting with Canadian Officials.

7. Obama’s IL Senate record is something of a fabrication. His name was put on a lot of legislation that others worked on. This was done in order to beef up his resume for a run for the US Senate. Judicial Watch recently state that Obama deliberately did not leave a paper trail on his IL Senate year.

Let’s be fair here. It seems that fact stretching and resume embellishment and downright lieing seems to go with politicians running for office. Somehow it seems to me that men are allowed to do this, but women are not. Dobule standards have abounded in this campaign.

Of course Clinton’s Bosnia tale would have a strong negative effect–HRC’s lying or “misspeaking” constitutes a recognizable pattern, and reminds many of the cr*p from the previous Clinton administration.

What’s truly bizarre, though, is that HRC risks lying about “dumb” stuff. She must think she won’t get caught, although when she does get caught, she seems to casually shrug off her “misstatements.” It’s bizarre, almost pathological.

Here are three dumb lies that beg the question: Why would she lie about this relatively inconsequential stuff? And what does that say about her ability to tell the truth about difficult matters?

***Appearing on NBC’s DATELINE, Sen. Clinton told Jane Pauley that Chelsea was around the World Trade Center on the morning of Sept. 11th:

“She had gone on what she thought would be a great jog,” Hillary Clinton explained. “She was going down to Battery Park, she was going to go around the towers. She was going to get a cup of coffee and - that’s when the plane hit!”

Hillary’s dramatic story about her daughter’s close call with the Twin Towers became a media sensation. “At that moment, she was not just a Senator, but a concerned parent,” TODAY show’s Katie Couric told viewers on 9/18/2001.
TRUTH: In the Dec/Jan 2002 issue of TALK magazine, Chelsea wrote that she was staying at a friend’s apt in Union Square, 12 blocks away. Her friend called with news about the first plane crashing into the WTC. Chelsea turned on the TV and watched the second plane crash.
“I stared senselessly at the television,” Chelsea writes.

****Hillary started claiming she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary after she met him in 1995. Bill Clinton even included this “true” story in his 2004 autobiography. Thing is, HRC was born in 1947, and Edmund Hillary didn’t conquer Mt. Everest until 1953, when HRC was 6 years old.
TRUTH: In October 2006, a campaign aide finally admitted it was not true after all, that it was just a “sweet family story that her mother told her to inspire greatness.” This sweet story, however, had never before been mentioned anywhere.

***On numerous other occasions, including in her Iowa stump speech, Clinton has said, “We used to say in the White House that if a place is too dangerous, too small or too poor, send the First Lady.” And that lead to her being sent to Bosnia and coming under sniper fire.
TRUTH: Well, now we know.

Actually, what hasn’t been covered much are her cascading excuses or “misstatements” about this Bosnia tale, culminating in her saying this to KDKA radio in Pittsburgh on 3/25/08:
“I have written about this and described in many different settings and I did misspeak the other day,” Clinton said during a live 10-minute interview. “This has been a very long campaign….Last week for the first time in 12 years or so, I misspoke.”

Bizarro. No wonder Obama’s lead has grown. It’s a wonder it’s not even bigger.

People should compare notes to notes based on intelligent, experience and capability of putting words into actions.

Do not be bias in your pick, cos’ you may have to do with your head at the expense of the heart. But, as long as you have had these considerations prior to making the decision, just do it. It clearly shows how intelligent or less intelligent you are in making that decision.

For those who support for the sake of support, this does not matter as their objective are different.

May the best candicate prevail.

Ericabyeo

And for all you Elton haters….WOULD YOU LIKE SOME CHEESE WITH THAT WHINE????