Comments on: Clinton: See this as a job interview, but ignore the hair

By: Docb

Docb — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:07:27 +0000

this is what itis about….
While the Clinton campaign steps up its efforts to ratify the sham elections in Michigan and Florida — their lone lifeline in a campaign they have otherwise thoroughly lost on the merits — they seek to disenfranchise actual voters in a real contest — that in Texas.

On Wednesday:

Garry Mauro, Clinton’s state campaign chairman, said Wednesday he is satisfied that the process is working well. Mauro said Clinton is planning no challenge to the process.

Birnberg said he is not expecting many challenges to convention delegates because too many delegates would have to be rejected to change the mix for either Obama or Clinton.

“If you’re talking about Senate District 13, which has 4,000 delegates, you cannot imagine how many credential disputes you’d have to have to change” the outcome, he said. “That probably takes 1,000 successful challenges mathematically.”

Then on Thursday:

Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Texas campaign is challenging the seating of delegates from numerous precincts for Saturday’s Democratic county conventions, particularly in Barack Obama’s strongholds.

State Senate District 23, which includes much of southern Dallas County, was a central target of the Clinton campaign.

Just before Wednesday’s deadline to file complaints before the county convention credentials committee, Clinton campaign officials delivered a large packet of challenges.

“There are numerous challenges,” said Dallas County District Clerk Gary Fitzsimmons, who is temporary chairman of the District 23 credentials committee. The district went solidly for Mr. Obama in the primary, and there’s a question over whether Mrs. Clinton will reach the 15 percent threshold needed to receive delegates.

The committee meets Thursday night to deal with minor challenges. The rest will be handled on Saturday, the day of the county conventions.

On a conference call Wednesday, Clinton campaign officials said they would not try to influence the county conventions with mass challenges before the credentials committee [...]

“Apparently the promise that the Clinton campaign made less than 24 hours ago not to challenge the seating of delegates at Saturday’s district conventions was just another made-up story,” [Obama spokesperson Josh] Earnest said. “The Clinton campaign’s politically-motivated outrage over disenfranchising voters apparently doesn’t extend to the 1.1 million Texans who participated in the precinct conventions earlier this month.”

Of course it doesn’t. Clinton originally agreed to the sanctions against Michigan and Florida. Yet now, even after the states have admitted they don’t have the money, time, or political will to get new sanctioned contests, the Clinton campaign clings to the states in an effort to spread enough uncertainty to keep her failed campaign alive.

Note that in Texas, SD-23 in Dallas is little different than SD-13 in Houston — Clinton got only about 27 percent of the vote, and only about 18 percent in the caucus. She’s in danger of failing to reach viability there and in Houston’s SD-13, and those are huge districts. Note also that the district, which the Clinton campaign is trying to disenfranchise, is essentially half African American, half Latino. But every delegate counts, and SD-23 has six of them. They’ll fight for every single one of them no matter how many people and communities they disenfranchise.

There are also reports that several south Texas counties, Clinton territory, are refusing to publish the location of the conventions. In the old day, no one showed up to these things, delegate slates were just filled in without hassle by some local party honcho. These people would like nothing else than to fill in a full slate of Clinton delegates without the hassles of “democracy” and all. So between credential challenges and other subterfuge designed to depress Obama’s performance and cast the caucus results in doubt, we’ll see that once again, Camp Clinton will do and say anything in its mad pursuit of power.

By: Michael

Michael — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:13:45 +0000

Resume?

She was in the White House for 8 years. So was the pastry chef. … and if the pastry chef was cute, more of a chance that she was sharing a bed with Bill, rather than Hillary.

The recently-released First Lady Agenda pages show us that the things she was most involved with during her years there were mostly about tea parties and state dinners.

By: Elizabeth

Elizabeth — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 05:24:19 +0000

Hillary, will you pledge to defend women against sexual exploitation in the workplace? How about Whitehouse interns?

By: Holli

Holli — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:01:19 +0000

This ridiculous blog is just another prime example of how sexism is alive and well in this country that is so proud of our advanced thinking. Why is Clinton’s hair important at all? Did we ask that question of any male candidate EVER? I choose instead to ask the questions that matter such as: Who is most qualified? Who do I feel best represents my beliefs and will do the work that I think needs to be done? Which candidate has what it takes to represent this country in a way I see fit? If you all want to let the media spin this thing and make up your minds for you, then go ahead. Be sheep just like most Americans are. I will not look to your blogs for any enlightenment, rest assured.

By: Mary O'Bryan

Mary O'Bryan — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:31:55 +0000

To the youth of America: Please learn about the issues before you decide who to vote for in this election. Don’t be swayed by spin that there is very little difference between Hillary and Barack. Hillary’s Solutions for America are far and away above his empty promises of hope. Hillary is right for America and we need to hire her for the job. Our country faces serious issues and the next President will be challenged above all others before them to restore our standing at home and abroad. Please just do your homework before you vote and then, I believe, you will vote for Hillary for President of the United States of America.

By: Beverly Hill

Beverly Hill — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:12:45 +0000

Wake up America! If you don’t see Obama part of a racist group then you are blind. He has been a part of the church for 20 years, and that same pastor has been there for 20 years. Think of the hate he and his whole family has heard and endorsed. To think the pastor used the Lord’s name in vain, and people are still not upset about it.
When did Obama change his name to a Muslin name?
That was not his birth name. He has never known poverty or even middle class.
He keeps dividing us into colors-white, black, brown, etc.
These are not races, just colors of skin.
On his site, he claims to be black-Afro American.
No mention of this Irish/English ancestry which makes up half of him.
I don’t know about the rest of you but I am an American citizen first with an ethnic background of Comanche, French, Scottish and Irish. Now, how would that look hypenated?

We have come so far, and he has put us back in time.

Think about his circle of friends that he does not want you to know about. Jesse Jackson, etc.

What about his involvement with the slum lord in Chicago?
He claims he is still is friend, too, just like his pastor, and all the others.

America, wake up before it is too late, unless you are wanting John McCain.

These are just a few reasons people are standing behind Hillary Clinton, and they will not stand behind Obama.

The Democratic Party is going to split wide open when everything about Obama is finally brought out.
It took them how long to expose his pastor?

Get smart, read, listen to all of his speeches and how he never addresses anything completely. It is quite a song and dance routine. He doesn’t even say the pledge, cross his heart for the pledge–that is from the direct doctrine of his church-which is not truly. If in a Mosque they said these words, we would call them terrorists. If is was a Caucasian church, you would them white racists or KKK. No one has the right to talk that way about the United States or any race and make-up untrue stories.

But, Ameica voted for Bush twice, so maybe that its
mentality.

God Bless America and hope He is with us to make the right decision.

By: Nisey01

Nisey01 — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:53:46 +0000

Hilliary, your hair looks electrifying, I guess as a result of the lie detector meter sending sparks straight to your hair as a result of your extensive lying ability. Try refraining if possible toning down your lies that your next test may result in your hair looking more subtle.

By: Zarthus

Zarthus — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:27:24 +0000

Hillary really said a winner this time. Sure, there are a few people out there that would vote for someone based upon his/her appearance for a job. However, others would actually research and investigate who the person is that is before them and decide to scrutinize the resume itself. These are the reasons Hillary will not have my vote.
1. Lying about White Water Conspiracy and having more involvement in it allegedly than Bill Clinton did. People died from this. If people do not know what that is, I’d suggest ‘google search’ on it or Wikipedia has an article that outlines it well. This investigation was going on and seemed to get lost in the shuffle while more people cared about Bill Clinton’s affairs.
2. Not paying taxes from a few years before and having to be told to do so while in the White House. They represent us very well. They were -tax evading-.
3. Lying about Bosnia. Nice move there Hillary, expressing how much more job experience you have while fibbing about it.
4. More experience boasting goes for Hillary each week…and yet…Hillary was the wife of the president. She was -not- the President, whether she likes it or not. She assisted him but she did not have his job and it would be nice if she’d stop making like she did. She gives herself way too many pats on the back for a job she did not hold.
5. She is not a personable sociable being. She plays nasty and seems extremely passive aggressive. I do not feel she would be good for negotiating and dealing with other nations well when things do go bad.
6. She is a hypocrite. She practically demanded that Obama make amends for Wright while her own husband is out making comments such as how he addressed the issue of Obama winning NC and SC, which consisted of saying ‘Jesse Jackson’ had won there as well when Bill was running. Come on! Wright is a pastor. Bill is her husband.
So all in all, I’ll go with who I can trust because this application is phony.

By: sEAN

sEAN — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:23:22 +0000

Not only does she need to cover her gray, she need to get back in her rocker, apparently she fell off of it, in the midst of her lying job and bumped her head. If she can’t stay on her job setting on the rocker without lying and crying then Bill need to let Monica attend her , and let Chelsea continue to hide from the truth, cause all she knows is lies.

By: Nancy Sabet

Nancy Sabet — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:35:24 +0000

Part of Hillary’ resume:
“She is the first New Yorker ever to serve on the Senate Armed Services Committee, working to see that America’s military has the necessary resources to protect our national security. She has visited troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and at Fort Drum in New York, home of the 10th Mountain Division and other New York bases, as well as at Walter Reed Military Hospital. She has learned first-hand the challenges facing American combat forces. Hillary passed legislation to track the health status of our troops so that conditions like Gulf War Syndrome would no longer be misdiagnosed. She is an original sponsor of legislation that expanded health benefits to members of the National Guard and Reserves and has been a strong critic of the Administration’s handling of Iraq.”