<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women&#8217;s views of Clinton, Obama slipped, poll said</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/</link>
	<description>Tracking U.S. politics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: swuzy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348663</link>
		<dc:creator>swuzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348663</guid>
		<description>I was very much pro Hillary from the beginning of the campaigns.  I still very much like her policy positions, her speeches, her personal enthusiasm, her energy, and very appealing projected cheerful positive personality.    Then I realized she is tragically, simply not electable.  Her repeated whoppers and the subsequent attempts to dismiss questions about them are the tip of the iceberg.   Hillary is a person who very much wants to have it both ways; to have her cake and eat it too; to come across winning and yet take underhanded means to push for off-topic agendas. 
1.  	Does she really miss-remember?  If so, what does that say about the acuteness of her Presidential mental tools?    I.e., we are in trouble.
2.	Does she fantasize and develop an extremely detailed fantasy of the events and then believed her embellished fantasy?  If so, what does that say on how we can trust her in forming the foundations of her judgments in the future as a president?   I.e., we are in trouble.  
3.	Does she deliberately and consciously lie and in detail, to further herself?  If so, does that show an underlying weakness towards using that type of a crutch in critical pressure situations either to steam roller others or to hide a position or worse?   I.e., we are in trouble.
	See also, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120663639483768965.html?mod=todays_columnists

     Hillary's boss on the Nixon impeachment team, Jerry Zeifman, says - 
o     He fired her and refused to give her a letter of recommendation, "Because she was a liar, .... She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer.  She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality."     http://www.jzeifman.com/ 
o     He "regrets" that he "had not reported her to the appropriate bar associations.  ....  Eventually, because of a number of her unethical practices I decided that I could not recommend her for any subsequent position of public or private trust."    http://www.aim.org/aim-column/hillarys-crocodile-tears-in-connecticut 
o     He says that Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception.  .... The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, her boss Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.   http://www.jzeifman.com/ 
        There are numerous other anecdotes on the web.
   o    http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york061303.asp
   o    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n3_v47/ai_16709018
    o   http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/hillarys_list_of_lies.html 
    o   http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9905EFDC1339F93BA35752C0A960958260&#38;scp=5&#38;sq=william+safire+blizzard+of+lies&#38;st=nyt
     Sadly, Hillary Clinton does not have a chance against John McCain.

    How can such a person like Hillary Clinton be President?   She would have to be dealing and negotiating with multiple foreign leaders, domestic leaders, many different constituencies, all having different agendas.   
o     Would she be agreeing to or promising one thing after she had forgotten prior promises in another direction?   
o     Would she be saying one thing, while working behind the scenes to do something else?  
o     Would she be fabricating fantasies to support her positions when  such positions are unfounded and have no popular support?    
    Who can trust her?    We had a problem with President Nixon's integrity, working surreptitiously behind the scenes at Watergate.  We have a problem with President Bush's character, fantasizing about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and fantasizing about Saddam's support for Al Queda.   How could we have taken such huge risks electing Presidents who are so flawed in their underlying integrity and character?   I am sad to conclude that Hillary's pattern of ethical lapses reveal a fundamental tragical weakness that simply makes her not electable, no matter how otherwise appealing she may seem to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very much pro Hillary from the beginning of the campaigns.  I still very much like her policy positions, her speeches, her personal enthusiasm, her energy, and very appealing projected cheerful positive personality.    Then I realized she is tragically, simply not electable.  Her repeated whoppers and the subsequent attempts to dismiss questions about them are the tip of the iceberg.   Hillary is a person who very much wants to have it both ways; to have her cake and eat it too; to come across winning and yet take underhanded means to push for off-topic agendas.<br />
1.  	Does she really miss-remember?  If so, what does that say about the acuteness of her Presidential mental tools?    I.e., we are in trouble.<br />
2.	Does she fantasize and develop an extremely detailed fantasy of the events and then believed her embellished fantasy?  If so, what does that say on how we can trust her in forming the foundations of her judgments in the future as a president?   I.e., we are in trouble.<br />
3.	Does she deliberately and consciously lie and in detail, to further herself?  If so, does that show an underlying weakness towards using that type of a crutch in critical pressure situations either to steam roller others or to hide a position or worse?   I.e., we are in trouble.<br />
	See also, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120663639483768965.html?mod=todays_columnists" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB12066363 9483768965.html?mod=todays_columnists</a></p>
<p>     Hillary&#8217;s boss on the Nixon impeachment team, Jerry Zeifman, says -<br />
o     He fired her and refused to give her a letter of recommendation, &#8220;Because she was a liar, &#8230;. She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer.  She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.&#8221;     <a href="http://www.jzeifman.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jzeifman.com/</a><br />
o     He &#8220;regrets&#8221; that he &#8220;had not reported her to the appropriate bar associations.  &#8230;.  Eventually, because of a number of her unethical practices I decided that I could not recommend her for any subsequent position of public or private trust.&#8221;    <a href="http://www.aim.org/aim-column/hillarys-crocodile-tears-in-connecticut" rel="nofollow">http://www.aim.org/aim-column/hillarys-c rocodile-tears-in-connecticut</a><br />
o     He says that Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception.  &#8230;. The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, her boss Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.   <a href="http://www.jzeifman.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jzeifman.com/</a><br />
        There are numerous other anecdotes on the web.<br />
   o    <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york061303.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york0 61303.asp</a><br />
   o    <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n3_v47/ai_16709018" rel="nofollow">http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1 282/is_n3_v47/ai_16709018</a><br />
    o   <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/hillarys_list_of_lies.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/article s/2008/03/hillarys_list_of_lies.html</a><br />
    o   <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9905EFDC1339F93BA35752C0A960958260&amp;scp=5&amp;sq=william+safire+blizzard+of+lies&amp;st=nyt" rel="nofollow">http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.ht ml?res=9905EFDC1339F93BA35752C0A96095826 0&amp;scp=5&amp;sq=william+safire+blizzard+of+li es&amp;st=nyt</a><br />
     Sadly, Hillary Clinton does not have a chance against John McCain.</p>
<p>    How can such a person like Hillary Clinton be President?   She would have to be dealing and negotiating with multiple foreign leaders, domestic leaders, many different constituencies, all having different agendas.<br />
o     Would she be agreeing to or promising one thing after she had forgotten prior promises in another direction?<br />
o     Would she be saying one thing, while working behind the scenes to do something else?<br />
o     Would she be fabricating fantasies to support her positions when  such positions are unfounded and have no popular support?<br />
    Who can trust her?    We had a problem with President Nixon&#8217;s integrity, working surreptitiously behind the scenes at Watergate.  We have a problem with President Bush&#8217;s character, fantasizing about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and fantasizing about Saddam&#8217;s support for Al Queda.   How could we have taken such huge risks electing Presidents who are so flawed in their underlying integrity and character?   I am sad to conclude that Hillary&#8217;s pattern of ethical lapses reveal a fundamental tragical weakness that simply makes her not electable, no matter how otherwise appealing she may seem to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348662</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348662</guid>
		<description>Clinton is slipping in part due to media bias, but mostly it is due to a lot of missteps.  It is hard to deny that to say another democrat is not prepared to be Commander in Chief, when he has more national experience than your husband had when he took office, is disingenuous.  Why would you even waste your time discussing the Bosnia issue in detail, and when another person disputed, why not just be honest?  It became a big deal because she decided to be dishonest about it.  She is now being hit with Columbia gate, but Obama was hit with Nafta Gate a week before OH and TX, and it turned out to be a pretty innocent thing.  The media has come down on both of them, at times.  The difference is that she has a longer record and more to be vetted, and in this information age, almost nothing gets past the media.  

People have to stop playing the victim card with Clinton, she is largely responsible for a number of her headlines.  Obama and Clinton are good candidates, and because there is such little difference between them on the issues, it is becoming a test of who do you feel can best lead this country, and he seems to connect with more Americans.

Also, this silly argument about Republicans secretly voting for Obama, so that the weaker candidate can win, I just don't buy.  There are a lot of people who like him on the issues and like his message.

There is an element of sexism involved in why Republicans dislike Clinton, so much.  There is also an element of Clinton being a woman (a sense of now is the time), in why she gets the white female vote.

There is an element of racism involved in why some don't vote for Obama.  There is also an element of Obama looking Black (he's interracial, so that is not exactly Black), in why he gets the Black vote.

But, there is something greater at work.  From an ideological standpoint, Clinton and Obama seem to have thought through the economy, Iraq, and most of the issues more than John McCain.  Further, he has flip-flopped on issues to get the Republican nomination (immigration, as one example).  He cannot be trusted by independents.  He cannot be trusted by Republicans.  If there is anyone, who has not been vetted, it is John McCain.

We have Keating Five.  We have his wife narrowly avoiding time in the federal pen.  John McCain eight years ago was formidable.  Now, no one knows what his views are, and he is running on Straight Talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton is slipping in part due to media bias, but mostly it is due to a lot of missteps.  It is hard to deny that to say another democrat is not prepared to be Commander in Chief, when he has more national experience than your husband had when he took office, is disingenuous.  Why would you even waste your time discussing the Bosnia issue in detail, and when another person disputed, why not just be honest?  It became a big deal because she decided to be dishonest about it.  She is now being hit with Columbia gate, but Obama was hit with Nafta Gate a week before OH and TX, and it turned out to be a pretty innocent thing.  The media has come down on both of them, at times.  The difference is that she has a longer record and more to be vetted, and in this information age, almost nothing gets past the media.  </p>
<p>People have to stop playing the victim card with Clinton, she is largely responsible for a number of her headlines.  Obama and Clinton are good candidates, and because there is such little difference between them on the issues, it is becoming a test of who do you feel can best lead this country, and he seems to connect with more Americans.</p>
<p>Also, this silly argument about Republicans secretly voting for Obama, so that the weaker candidate can win, I just don&#8217;t buy.  There are a lot of people who like him on the issues and like his message.</p>
<p>There is an element of sexism involved in why Republicans dislike Clinton, so much.  There is also an element of Clinton being a woman (a sense of now is the time), in why she gets the white female vote.</p>
<p>There is an element of racism involved in why some don&#8217;t vote for Obama.  There is also an element of Obama looking Black (he&#8217;s interracial, so that is not exactly Black), in why he gets the Black vote.</p>
<p>But, there is something greater at work.  From an ideological standpoint, Clinton and Obama seem to have thought through the economy, Iraq, and most of the issues more than John McCain.  Further, he has flip-flopped on issues to get the Republican nomination (immigration, as one example).  He cannot be trusted by independents.  He cannot be trusted by Republicans.  If there is anyone, who has not been vetted, it is John McCain.</p>
<p>We have Keating Five.  We have his wife narrowly avoiding time in the federal pen.  John McCain eight years ago was formidable.  Now, no one knows what his views are, and he is running on Straight Talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassandra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348617</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348617</guid>
		<description>Little wonder that Hillary would be slipping with the relentless bashing by the media.  They are either bashing, gnoring her as a candidate or explaining why she can't possibly win.  This is a ridiculous campaign and kind of scary that the media has so strongly inserted itself in this process.  The Obama cheerleading squad... Unfortunately, the voting public is left with limited information about this candidate that has such a thin public record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little wonder that Hillary would be slipping with the relentless bashing by the media.  They are either bashing, gnoring her as a candidate or explaining why she can&#8217;t possibly win.  This is a ridiculous campaign and kind of scary that the media has so strongly inserted itself in this process.  The Obama cheerleading squad&#8230; Unfortunately, the voting public is left with limited information about this candidate that has such a thin public record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cely Bely</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348589</link>
		<dc:creator>Cely Bely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348589</guid>
		<description>I was a supporter of Hillary at one time.  However, her constant lying, lack of ability to contain her contempt as demonstrated by her non-verbal communication, her inability to apologize or state that she lied (using the word, misspoke), her arrogance and lack of elegance as a woman, and her negative campaigning, I have found distasteful and not the attributes I would see in a president.

You can be tough without being arrogant, loud, and abrasive. Look at the women leaders of other nations, especially 3rd world nations, where there is a high illiteracy rate, high unemployment, and poor health care and social services.  Look at the elegance in which Benazir Bhutto, Margaret Thatcher, Indira Gandhi, Golda Meyer handled themselves.

Hillay is crude.  America is an insular country that views toughness in a woman by her being less of a woman.  America is not alone.  Hillary is not well respected internationally, and that is one thing that people here fail to consider.  America is not an island and will not succeed if the president perpetuates the arrogance and hostility espoused by the Bush regime.  Hillary will propogate that.  The word 'Unity' domestically and internationally is not in her manifesto.

However, to lie, be crude, loud, and overbearing to the moderators of debates, like the last one, is what she does best.  That is NOT leadership.  That is power mongery.  When will this country awaken to look beyond itself.  I am an immigrant who has travelled extensively and is well educated in human and political geography, which most Americans are not taught consistently and well in elementary nor high school.  

Most American do not even know the difference between British English and American English nor are sensitive to cultural differences.  If they were, they would view Hillary Clinton's attributes differently and see where she is sorely lacking and understand why Obama has been so well received domestically and internationally... he is dignified, respectful, hopeful, poised, cultually sensitive, travelled, and most of all, understands the true meaning of 'Unity'. You have to understand America and the world stage to get the essence of 'Unity'.

Only when you understand the world stage beyond America can you fully appreciate the attributes of a leader.  Hillary is not it!!!  Just like how George Bush isn't!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a supporter of Hillary at one time.  However, her constant lying, lack of ability to contain her contempt as demonstrated by her non-verbal communication, her inability to apologize or state that she lied (using the word, misspoke), her arrogance and lack of elegance as a woman, and her negative campaigning, I have found distasteful and not the attributes I would see in a president.</p>
<p>You can be tough without being arrogant, loud, and abrasive. Look at the women leaders of other nations, especially 3rd world nations, where there is a high illiteracy rate, high unemployment, and poor health care and social services.  Look at the elegance in which Benazir Bhutto, Margaret Thatcher, Indira Gandhi, Golda Meyer handled themselves.</p>
<p>Hillay is crude.  America is an insular country that views toughness in a woman by her being less of a woman.  America is not alone.  Hillary is not well respected internationally, and that is one thing that people here fail to consider.  America is not an island and will not succeed if the president perpetuates the arrogance and hostility espoused by the Bush regime.  Hillary will propogate that.  The word &#8216;Unity&#8217; domestically and internationally is not in her manifesto.</p>
<p>However, to lie, be crude, loud, and overbearing to the moderators of debates, like the last one, is what she does best.  That is NOT leadership.  That is power mongery.  When will this country awaken to look beyond itself.  I am an immigrant who has travelled extensively and is well educated in human and political geography, which most Americans are not taught consistently and well in elementary nor high school.  </p>
<p>Most American do not even know the difference between British English and American English nor are sensitive to cultural differences.  If they were, they would view Hillary Clinton&#8217;s attributes differently and see where she is sorely lacking and understand why Obama has been so well received domestically and internationally&#8230; he is dignified, respectful, hopeful, poised, cultually sensitive, travelled, and most of all, understands the true meaning of &#8216;Unity&#8217;. You have to understand America and the world stage to get the essence of &#8216;Unity&#8217;.</p>
<p>Only when you understand the world stage beyond America can you fully appreciate the attributes of a leader.  Hillary is not it!!!  Just like how George Bush isn&#8217;t!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean McM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348585</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean McM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348585</guid>
		<description>Remember the words from that wonderful musical "If I were a rich man..."

How about "If I were a rich woman..."....

Sue the American media and Press for interference in the electoral process of 2008.  Mysogynist men and homophobic women are in control and are in morbid fear of a woman as President. 

Badly needed in America is CHANGE:  

brains over braun

leadership vs. social domination

public service ethic vs narcissistic self service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the words from that wonderful musical &#8220;If I were a rich man&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>How about &#8220;If I were a rich woman&#8230;&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Sue the American media and Press for interference in the electoral process of 2008.  Mysogynist men and homophobic women are in control and are in morbid fear of a woman as President. </p>
<p>Badly needed in America is CHANGE:  </p>
<p>brains over braun</p>
<p>leadership vs. social domination</p>
<p>public service ethic vs narcissistic self service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EmmyCA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348578</link>
		<dc:creator>EmmyCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348578</guid>
		<description>Dear Hillary fans every where, please come and join our protest in Newyork (Friday April 11 at 8 AM) with other Hillary fans to call for FL and MI votes counted and to STOP media being biased against Hillary!!

Protest in New York City
When: Friday, April 11 (8am), 2008 
Where: West 48th St &#38; Rockefeller Plaza

http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/april11/

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ceym55Xlmzg

http://youtube.com/watch?v=kcdnlNZg2iM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n9l3oVj3L4

We demand an END to Media Bias!

We demand an END to Hate Speech!

We demand an END to Prejudice against Hillary!

We demand Florida &#38; Michigan votes COUNT as cast!

We demand an END to Rigging of the Democratic Primary!

Please spread this information around, we need as much people come as possible. This event will be on TV news live

Hillary 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Hillary fans every where, please come and join our protest in Newyork (Friday April 11 at 8 AM) with other Hillary fans to call for FL and MI votes counted and to STOP media being biased against Hillary!!</p>
<p>Protest in New York City<br />
When: Friday, April 11 (8am), 2008<br />
Where: West 48th St &amp; Rockefeller Plaza</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/april11/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/april 11/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=ceym55Xlmzg" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=ceym55Xlmzg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=kcdnlNZg2iM" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=kcdnlNZg2iM</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n9l3oVj3L4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n9l3oVj3 L4</a></p>
<p>We demand an END to Media Bias!</p>
<p>We demand an END to Hate Speech!</p>
<p>We demand an END to Prejudice against Hillary!</p>
<p>We demand Florida &amp; Michigan votes COUNT as cast!</p>
<p>We demand an END to Rigging of the Democratic Primary!</p>
<p>Please spread this information around, we need as much people come as possible. This event will be on TV news live</p>
<p>Hillary 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Donar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348566</link>
		<dc:creator>David Donar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348566</guid>
		<description>I wonder why people have a lesser opinion of Hillary.  Always inventing a new persona when it best suits her.  I know politicians lie, but please remain consistent with your schtick.  The only persona that best fits Hillary is Daffy Duck and her "despicable" behavior.

http://politicalgrafitti.blogspot.com/2008/04/hillary-and-daffy.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why people have a lesser opinion of Hillary.  Always inventing a new persona when it best suits her.  I know politicians lie, but please remain consistent with your schtick.  The only persona that best fits Hillary is Daffy Duck and her &#8220;despicable&#8221; behavior.</p>
<p><a href="http://politicalgrafitti.blogspot.com/2008/04/hillary-and-daffy.html" rel="nofollow">http://politicalgrafitti.blogspot.com/20 08/04/hillary-and-daffy.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacksmith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348563</link>
		<dc:creator>jacksmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348563</guid>
		<description>DON'T BE DUPED !!!

Large numbers of Republicans have been voting for Barack Obama in the DEMOCRATIC primaries, and caucuses from early on. Because they feel he would be a weaker opponent against John McCain. And because they feel that a Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama ticket would be unbeatable. And also because with a Clinton and Obama ticket you are almost 100% certain to get quality, affordable universal health care very soon.

But first, all of you have to make certain that Hillary Clinton takes the democratic nomination and then the Whitehouse. NOW! is the time. THIS! is the moment you have all been working, and waiting for. You can do this America. “Carpe diem” (harvest the day).

I think Hillary Clinton see’s a beautiful world of  plenty for all. She is a woman, and a mother. And it’s time America. Do this for your-selves, and your children’s future. You will have to work together on this and be aggressive, relentless, and creative. Americans face an even worse catastrophe ahead than the one you are living through now.

You see, the medical and insurance industry mostly support the republicans with the money they ripped off from you. And they don’t want you to have quality, affordable universal health care. They want to be able to continue to rip you off, and kill you and your children by continuing to deny you life saving medical care that you have already paid for. So they can continue to make more immoral profits for them-selves.

Hillary Clinton has actually won by much larger margins than the vote totals showed. And lost by much smaller vote margins than the vote totals showed. Her delegate count is actually much higher than it shows. And higher than Obama’s. She also leads in the electoral college numbers that you must win to become  President in the November national election. HILLARY CLINTON IS ALREADY THE TRUE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE!

As much as 30% of Obama's primary, and caucus votes are Republicans trying to choose the weakest democratic candidate for McCain to run against. These Republicans have been gaming the caucuses where it is easier to vote cheat. This is why Obama has not been able to win the BIG! states primaries. Even with Republican vote cheating help.

Hillary Clinton has been OUT MANNED! OUT GUNNED! and OUT SPENT! 4 and 5 to 1. Yet Obama  has only been able to manage a very tenuous, and questionable tie with Hillary Clinton.

If Obama is the democratic nominee for the national election in November he will be slaughtered. Because the Republican vote cheating help will suddenly evaporate. All of this vote fraud and republican manipulation has made Obama falsely look like a much stronger candidate than he really is. YOUNG PEOPLE. DON’T BE DUPED! Think about it. You have the most to lose.

The democratic party needs to fix this outrage. I suggest a Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama ticket. Everyone needs to throw all your support to Hillary Clinton NOW! So you can end this outrage against YOU the voter, and against democracy.

I think Barack Obama has a once in a life time chance to make the ultimate historic gesture for unity, and change in America by accepting Hillary Clinton’s offer as running mate. Such an act now would for ever seal Barack Obama’s place at the top of the list of Americas all time great leaders, and unifiers for all of history. 

The democratic party, and the super-delegates have a decision to make. Are the democrats, and the democratic party going to choose the DEMOCRATIC party nominee to fight for the American people. Or are the republicans going to choose the DEMOCRATIC party nominee through vote fraud, and gaming the DEMOCRATIC party primaries, and caucuses.

Fortunately the Clinton’s have been able to hold on against this fraudulent outrage with those repeated dramatic comebacks of Hillary Clinton’s. Only the Clinton’s are that resourceful, and strong. Hillary Clinton is your NOMINEE. They are the best I have ever seen.

“This is not a game” (Hillary Clinton)

Sincerely

jacksmith...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DON&#8217;T BE DUPED !!!</p>
<p>Large numbers of Republicans have been voting for Barack Obama in the DEMOCRATIC primaries, and caucuses from early on. Because they feel he would be a weaker opponent against John McCain. And because they feel that a Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama ticket would be unbeatable. And also because with a Clinton and Obama ticket you are almost 100% certain to get quality, affordable universal health care very soon.</p>
<p>But first, all of you have to make certain that Hillary Clinton takes the democratic nomination and then the Whitehouse. NOW! is the time. THIS! is the moment you have all been working, and waiting for. You can do this America. “Carpe diem” (harvest the day).</p>
<p>I think Hillary Clinton see’s a beautiful world of  plenty for all. She is a woman, and a mother. And it’s time America. Do this for your-selves, and your children’s future. You will have to work together on this and be aggressive, relentless, and creative. Americans face an even worse catastrophe ahead than the one you are living through now.</p>
<p>You see, the medical and insurance industry mostly support the republicans with the money they ripped off from you. And they don’t want you to have quality, affordable universal health care. They want to be able to continue to rip you off, and kill you and your children by continuing to deny you life saving medical care that you have already paid for. So they can continue to make more immoral profits for them-selves.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton has actually won by much larger margins than the vote totals showed. And lost by much smaller vote margins than the vote totals showed. Her delegate count is actually much higher than it shows. And higher than Obama’s. She also leads in the electoral college numbers that you must win to become  President in the November national election. HILLARY CLINTON IS ALREADY THE TRUE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE!</p>
<p>As much as 30% of Obama&#8217;s primary, and caucus votes are Republicans trying to choose the weakest democratic candidate for McCain to run against. These Republicans have been gaming the caucuses where it is easier to vote cheat. This is why Obama has not been able to win the BIG! states primaries. Even with Republican vote cheating help.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton has been OUT MANNED! OUT GUNNED! and OUT SPENT! 4 and 5 to 1. Yet Obama  has only been able to manage a very tenuous, and questionable tie with Hillary Clinton.</p>
<p>If Obama is the democratic nominee for the national election in November he will be slaughtered. Because the Republican vote cheating help will suddenly evaporate. All of this vote fraud and republican manipulation has made Obama falsely look like a much stronger candidate than he really is. YOUNG PEOPLE. DON’T BE DUPED! Think about it. You have the most to lose.</p>
<p>The democratic party needs to fix this outrage. I suggest a Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama ticket. Everyone needs to throw all your support to Hillary Clinton NOW! So you can end this outrage against YOU the voter, and against democracy.</p>
<p>I think Barack Obama has a once in a life time chance to make the ultimate historic gesture for unity, and change in America by accepting Hillary Clinton’s offer as running mate. Such an act now would for ever seal Barack Obama’s place at the top of the list of Americas all time great leaders, and unifiers for all of history. </p>
<p>The democratic party, and the super-delegates have a decision to make. Are the democrats, and the democratic party going to choose the DEMOCRATIC party nominee to fight for the American people. Or are the republicans going to choose the DEMOCRATIC party nominee through vote fraud, and gaming the DEMOCRATIC party primaries, and caucuses.</p>
<p>Fortunately the Clinton’s have been able to hold on against this fraudulent outrage with those repeated dramatic comebacks of Hillary Clinton’s. Only the Clinton’s are that resourceful, and strong. Hillary Clinton is your NOMINEE. They are the best I have ever seen.</p>
<p>“This is not a game” (Hillary Clinton)</p>
<p>Sincerely</p>
<p>jacksmith&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348561</link>
		<dc:creator>cathey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348561</guid>
		<description>...and of what VALUE is this story to help the public be more informed?

Clinton (despite the negative press) seems most focused to me:
1) economy (get our surplus back)
2) healthcare (a most BASIC need of the people)
3) VOTES (every voter MUST BE counted)
4) respect (on the world stage).

She has worked hard and long for the people, gets little credit and STILL fights for the common good.  Kudos for the former first lady.  She did not choose to bask in the aftermath of a great administration that made this country PROUD.  That speaks volumes.

Enough said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and of what VALUE is this story to help the public be more informed?</p>
<p>Clinton (despite the negative press) seems most focused to me:<br />
1) economy (get our surplus back)<br />
2) healthcare (a most BASIC need of the people)<br />
3) VOTES (every voter MUST BE counted)<br />
4) respect (on the world stage).</p>
<p>She has worked hard and long for the people, gets little credit and STILL fights for the common good.  Kudos for the former first lady.  She did not choose to bask in the aftermath of a great administration that made this country PROUD.  That speaks volumes.</p>
<p>Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hobo Joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348559</link>
		<dc:creator>Hobo Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/04/10/womens-views-of-clinton-obama-slipped-poll-said/#comment-348559</guid>
		<description>I am tired of listening to these Bobble-headed Democratic Presidential Candidates lying to the people, telling them how bad the Bush Administration is, and how they are going to change the country for the better.  They will do no more or no less than the people that are in their pockets, and the Congress will let them do.  Obama mis-spoke when he said this is the United States of America, to him, it is the United States of Africa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am tired of listening to these Bobble-headed Democratic Presidential Candidates lying to the people, telling them how bad the Bush Administration is, and how they are going to change the country for the better.  They will do no more or no less than the people that are in their pockets, and the Congress will let them do.  Obama mis-spoke when he said this is the United States of America, to him, it is the United States of Africa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
