I am sad to say that your articles look more like propaganda then serious reporting. You always bring Senator Clinton statements and not a word about Senator Obama statements or even responses. You call him ‘her rival’ while she is ‘the Presidential Candidate’.

It would be OK if you formally join Senator Clinton;’s campaign, but otherwise it is pretty misleading and not serious reporting.

Wouldn’t you agree? (I’d be very surprise to receive an answer, please surprise me!)

Gershon Luria
San Lorenzo, CA

Hillary is the way to go if we want some real help.

Another poster here has comments on Wright. While that post might be in the wrong thread, I have to agree that Wright’s comments are as racist as they come. Why is it that a black preacher can talk about “black religion,” but a white, hispanic, green or purple preacher cannot do the same? The game of “race card” is past its prime and holds no longer holds power.

If Obama is truly interested in a new society, he will denounce any attempt to segregate whites from blacks, and therefore denounce Wright. Yet he steadfastly refuses to do so, instead supporting Wright while at the same time attempting to disagree with some - not all - of Wright’s misguided rants.

Another political dodge from the Obama camp, and certainly not the “new politics” that Obama preaches. The emperor has no clothes.

Obama says he is trying to “change type of stereotyping and false division” [racism], but uses “typical white women” to describe his grandmother. Obama, is a Liar, a racist, and a FAKE.

A VERY GOOD ARTICLE FROM FACTCHECK.ORG ABOUT THE RACIST THEOLOGY OF OBAMA”S CHURCH:
The “theology” that Wright teaches at his church is nothing like Christianity as most people understand it. The brand of theology which Wright has been teaching Obama and the others at his church is called “black liberation theology.” Wright admits this and it is stated on the church’s website. Black theology is based upon the premise of the white oppressor against the black oppressed. This is why, for example, that Wright refers to Jesus as black, and his killers as white. This is the only way the story of Jesus fits within this brand of “theology.” Rev. Wright cites James Cone, another proponent of black liberation theology, as his theological inspiration. Here are just a couple of James Cone’s quotes: (1) “To be Christian is to be one of those whom God has chosen. God has chosen black people.” (2) “While it is true that blacks do hate whites, black hatred is not racism.” (3) “All white men are responsible for white oppression.” (4) “Theologically, Malcolm X was not far wrong when he called the white man “the devil.” (5) “If there is any contemporary meaning of the Antichrist, the white church seems to be a manifestation of it.” (6) “Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.” *** These statements, and this “theology,” are fundamentally racist and divisive. The fact that Obama has chosen to belong to this racist church for 20 years speaks volumes about his character and judgment, and flies in the face of his pronouncements about his ability and intent to “unite” this country.