Reuters Blogs

Front Row Washington

Tracking U.S. politics

10:34 May 4th, 2008

Fiery sermons at Obama’s church unnerved Oprah

Posted by: Andy Sullivan
Tags: Front Row Washington, , , , , ,

Fiery sermons didn’t drive Barack Obama away from his church, but they did unnerve one other prominent parishioner — media mogul Oprah Winfrey.

oprah.jpgAccording to Newsweek, Winfrey stopped attending Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ in the 1990s in part because she wanted to distance herself from the incendiary views of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

“She’s always been aware that her audience is very mainstream, and doing anything to offend them just wouldn’t be smart,” one anymous source tells the magazine. “She’s been around black churches all her life, so Rev. Wright’s anger-filled message didn’t surprise her. But it just wasn’t what she was looking for in a church.”

Wright, of course, is the preacher whose racially charged denunciations of the U.S. government have caused such heartburn for Obama’s bid for the Democratic nomination since they were made public in March. Evidently Winfrey, an Obama supporter, wanted to avoid a conflict of her own.

But Oprah had other reasons for leaving as well, another anonymous source tells Newsweek.

“There is the Church of Oprah now,” the longtime friend says. “She has her own following.”

Photo: REUTERS/Danny Moloshok (Winfrey campaigns for Obama in Los Angeles, April 2)

65 comments so far

Oprah is not a politician. It’s not her job to unite the Democratic party. She has enough to worry about with her ratings, which have gone down since her Obama endorsement. Appearing partisan is not going to help her.

If the self-proclaimed ‘uniter’ cannot unite with his own pastor, that’s a sign of his (in)effectiveness or (un)willingness to bring about real change.

- Posted by EV

Oprah….absoultely disappointing in her backing of Obama…

If Obama is here to transcend race then why are 95% of blacks voting for him and some of the things he has siad, if it were said by ‘white’ Clinton or McCain, they would be out of the race by now…Obama is a smooth speaker nothing more…

I am not black neither white…

- Posted by Rakesh Sumit

As soon as you wrote, “one anonymous source said,” you completely through credibility out the window. This is just another disgraceful attempt to mislead the public and call it journalism. Shame on you.

- Posted by jennifer

There are at least ten reasons to not vote for Obama, that do not include his lack of judgement in choosing Wright as a pastor:

1)Obama refuses to speak to reporters/walks out of conferences. He is not a transparent politician. 

2)He was involved with Tony Rezko, who was indicted for influence peddling and is a corrupting influence in Illinois politics. 

3)Tony Rezko got millions of dollars from the government to create affordable housing in Obama’s district, now 11 of the buildings he was supposed to fix are boarded-up and are unlivable. 

4)Obama voted “present” hundreds of times instead of taking a stand because he did not want to offend contributors, like Robert Blackwell, who Obama helped obtain state grants for. 

5)Obama chose as his mentor Bill Ayers and Dohrn, who are terrorists who detonated bombs on US territory and they helped him start his career. 

6) Obama lied about filling out a questionnaire that details his stand on many important issues like abortion, the death penalty and gun control. It has his handwriting but he said a staffer filled it out. Obama also lied about the Kennedy family helping his father. 

7)Obama also has acknowledged that he “voted by mistake” many times?! 

8)Obama made a statement that said his grandmother is “a typical white person” who has a “reaction bred” into her when she sees someone she does not know. 

9)Obama made a statement that small-town Americans are bitter and cling to guns, religion, and anti-trade sentiment.
10)Obama lies about the Clinton economic boom, if you go to FactCheck.org, you will see that Clinton is credited for passing the 1993 budget that helped create the boom of the 1990s.

If you want to see it on YouTube, here it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAUJeeKoh NA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5l6oAD5d -s

- Posted by LE

AGAIN . . . guilty by association. ENOUGH ALREADY.
At my church, I eat the meat and throw away the bones and so do most of us.

Let’s talk about real issues.

- Posted by marymarshall

I agree with GMT, Oprah should have Hillary on her show to show to show that her backing Obama isn’t racist or one-sided. What about all the women who watch and support her show?

- Posted by Cheryl

Oprah did not endorse Obama because he is black or thinks like Wright. As a matter of fact we’re ready to move on beyond Wright. He’s not running for President. Eventhough, Wright is a witness to racial hatred, and discrimination, and angered beyond belief. Obama like me did not have to deal with Jim Crow to the extent that Wright had too. Hillary won in PA where some older Americans still think that bigotry should be the social norm. PA is Hillary’s hometurf. She should have won it as impressively as Obama won Hawaii. Furthermore, when people that are willing to vote out of emotion rather than logic and common sense those who seek to suck the economic life out of us win. Being at the bottom of the pole economically and politically is what the definition of minority is. If being an elitist is what people call those who tell the truth, and try to the what is right then Jesus was an elitist. If you want to be told how great you are, talk to those who want to control you. If you want someone who want to be upfront, willing to suffer for his friends, and refuses to commit spiritual suicide for political gain, then vote for Obama. There is still plenty of time till I cast my vote in Nov. I always vote, never being a one issue voter. One thing is certain, I don’t vote out of emotion, and I don’t vote for stupid. I vote for the best candidate for the job.

- Posted by Willie

Nice try BZ, but the idea that Obama is unelectable is only held by racists Rush Limbaugh people (same thing) and Hillary operatives (though of course even the operatives don’t believe it; they just say it).

If Hillary were to get the nomination, good-bye Democratic Party.

- Posted by Tom

I disagree. If Oprah was smart, she’d stay out of politics for the rest of the primary season at least, and only butt her head in again to invite both the Republican and Democratic candidates to her show for short segments.

Oprah can do greater good by staying more distant from politics and pulling people together through her Angels network and other bipartisan efforts.

- Posted by Judy

So Oprah should endorse a candidate if he’s black? BZ, get real you sound racist. The only people who are tarnished are you confused Hillary supporters who think Ms. Clinton is more electable than Senator Obama.

- Posted by BZ

I don’t think Oprah should have sent so much money & support to Obama. He may be a very good guy but he’s too inexperienced to be President of the United States. Support from someone so rich and powerful as Oprah gave unfair advantage to him.
I think Oprah has too much power in this country.
None of us will ever know if she and Obama share the distorted views of Rev Wright. Let’s hope they don’t.
America may be far from perfect, but travel the world and your eyes will be opened to the fact that most other countries are far worse.
Instead of slamming our country - let’s do our part to make it a better place!

- Posted by Debbie

Amen. I was very, very disappointed in her as well and have not watched her show since. Oprah, it surely wasn’t a “light bulb” moment, was it?

- Posted by Gloria R.

BZ,

I agree that Oprah should allow Hillary Clinton on her show, if an opportunity presents itself. In many ways, Oprah transcends politics. Then again,she may really believe in Obama.

I take issue with your statement that Obama is unelectable, so she should do damage control. He is certainly no less electable that McCain or Clinton, who have a string of shortcomings as well. So, I believe she should follow her heart without fear.

- Posted by OregonDan

So speaketh the Clintonista. Oprah is very smart. It’s why she backed Obama in the first place. The Clintons have 20+ years of baggage, dirty tricks and enemies. Bill Clinton the more popular and charismatic of the two never ever got 51% of the popular vote and managed to lose the house and the senate to the republicans. Hillary would be a disaster. Might as well elect McCain the result would be the same.

- Posted by Darksider

What rubbish. Oprah has millions of fans. Many who support Senator Clinton, others who support Senator Obama, and still others who support Senator McCain. She has every right (and responsibility) as a powerful American citizen to let her voice be heard. Celebrities have done it before and will continue to.
To imply she is supporting Senator Obama simply because of the color of his skin is shear non-sense. Would she be expected to smooth things over if her candidate of choice were Senator Clinton? Or better yet would she have to explain or smooth things over if McCain were her guy?
Finally, unelectable? Says who? Those are the little subtle comments that are rooted in YES racism.

- Posted by p. Christian

Obama is unelectable?

Those who underestimate Barack Obama do so at their peril.

Ask the 2007 presumptive Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, about the funny thing that happened on her way to the nomination.

- Posted by Malama Makena

Oprah did more to animate Obama’s empty suit than anyone on the planet. In the end, her “religious” affiliation with Wright gave way to more material concerns. And her initial support of Hillary Clinton back in early 2007 gave way to her not being able to see beyond the color of her own skin after all.

- Posted by Mandelay

Oprah is a citizen and has the right to take whatever political stand she wants to. Aside from having Obama on at the beginning of his presidential run, I don’t see how her political choices have affected her programming, and if she takes a hit for saying how she feels, I think it’s her viewers’ problem if they don’t like it. She’s not shoving her views on others or using her show as a pro-Obama propganda machine, and anyone who would suggest otherwise needs to consider what their political motivations are when they comment on the situation.

- Posted by JC

“One anymous source tells the magazine”……….This is nonsense! This article is meant to imply that Obama might have heard the messages but he did not distance himself? Why don’t you guys start coverage of John Hagee and the Catholic church whore issue?

- Posted by Patriot Democrat

She is a woman and an American Citizen first and she has the right to make a decision and support the candidate that she wants. Why should anyone have to hide who they support or endorse?

- Posted by Musicisourhigh

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.