WASHINGTON - Given the rise of Sarah Palin’s political star, is Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama regretting his decision not to choose Hillary Clinton as his running mate?
Palin, the Republican vice presidential running mate to White House hopeful John McCain, thinks so and even Obama’s running mate wondered whether Clinton would have been a better choice instead of Joe Biden. But what about Clinton herself?
“We have a great Democratic vice-presidential candidate,” Clinton said when asked about Palin’s comment in an interview on ABC’s “Good Morning America” that will air on Tuesday.
Clinton praised her “friend” Biden as a strong leader who understands the big issues the United States faces at home and abroad.
“So I’m very happy going out campaigning as hard as I can for both Barack and Joe,” Clinton said.
Palin told ABC’s World News Tonight anchor Charlie Gibson on Friday she believed Obama regretted not picking Clinton, his chief rival for the Democratic nomination, as his No. 2.
“I think he’s regretting not picking her now, I do. What, what determination, and grit, and even grace through some tough shots that were fired her way — she handled those well,” Palin said.
Click here for more Reuters 2008 campaign coverage.
- Photo credit: Reuters/Brian Snyder (Biden on stage at the Democratic National Convention with an image of Clinton on the screen behind him.)

Trackback
40 comments so far
Previous | 2 | 1 | Next
From check to checkmate: Obama’s winning strategy.
All those stories about the Dems being suddenly outmaneuvered and scratching their heads have to end – it is time to refocus. Presented below is the simple chess move that will decisively win Obama the election. If you agree, please copy, paste, post, spread the word and even pass it on to someone in the Obama camp if you possibly can!! The stakes are too high, and the thought of getting that 3am call that McCain has won the election is just too frightening:
The strategy:
Don’t try to refute and in fact actually acknowledge that McCain and Palin are “mavericks” – then, make “maverick” equal “dangerous” and “unsafe” and make “maverick” equal “more of the same.” Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Aschcroft, Wolfowitz, Gonzales etc. were all mavericks - and look what happened! All that maverick behavior soon led to corruption, deception, mismanagement, damaged relationships across the world, a weakened America etc. etc…:
“Can we really afford four more years of maverick? Barack Obama: real leadership.”
Why it will work:
Firstly, you don’t win campaigns by just trying to refute the opposition’s attacks - you have to boldly set the agenda and this does just that. The Reps took Obama’s popularity and tried to turn it against him - i.e. “Moses” “The One.” But they themselves are banking literally everything on this maverick brand (both for McCain and Palin) - that is all they have and that is actually their greatest weakness – don’t run from it, tackle it! By challenging the maverick premise head-on and changing the meaning of “maverick” into something unstable and unsafe you will redefine their own message and use it against them. They will either have to stop using “maverick” and focus on the issues (which means they lose) or keep using it and dig themselves into a hole whereby people come to see that they really don’t want another maverick administration.
“Enough!”
You will have to push it hard and over and over again, but it really is that simple.
“Hasn’t America had enough of maverick?”
Clip of Bush: “Bring ‘em on!” Clip of Gonzales: “I don’t recall.” Clip of Rumsfeld: “Heenie-peenie pie in the sky!”
“Barack Obama: leadership that restores America.”
Other advantages:
-It is not sniping or petty, so Senator Obama can uphold his “new kind of campaign” ethos.
-The McCain camp is instantly on the defensive and that is where you want them.
-It is not trying to tear down Palin (which won’t work and may backfire), but rather just grouping both McCain and Palin with the other dangerous mavericks like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld etc. Add to this McCain’s famously bad temperament and you have all the material you need.
-It is new, but keeps in tune with your prior messages (so you won’t look like you are desperately shifting strategy) of tying McCain to Bush and presenting him as more of the same. That message ran its course and lost its power, this will give it a whole new jolt of life.
- It is bold, audacious and headline grabbing - very un-Gore/Kerry.
-Most importantly it will work because most voters don’t want more Bush and don’t want more Republican leadership. This presents a crystal clear message that if executed strongly will shift opinion back towards Obama as something new; as a real agent of change; as a new kind of leader. That is what his supporters already believe, and it is time to make that message loud and clear.
- Posted by DeejI took a test on a web site that correlated my “beliefs” with those of McCain, Obama, and Hillary about a year ago.
Not surprisingly, I had 80% in common with Hillary, 79% in common with Barack, and 20% in common with McCain.
I will be voting Obama/Biden, because logically speaking, why would I vote for someone I have 20% in common with?
I know some of you are disgruntled Hillary supporters, but let’s get real: if you vote for McCain/Palin you will be going against your values.
Please stick to the issues, Barack and Hillary are almost identical in their beliefs.
- Posted by Lily ThiesHillary has allways been the strong and right one. Obama as the weakest one was selected by the good old boys and girls of the DNC because they thought he would be their puppet.Hillary won even with all the cheating Obama did in the polls and caucusus. Hillary will be back but as we have no party anymore i and all my familt and freinds will be voting for Mccain/Palin
- Posted by sandipumaI have to agree with Lucyblue. If female voters are being so easily swayed from Hillary Clinton to Palin, simply because she is a woman, then there is a deep-rooted issue with Obama. Racism? Sheer cattiness? Ignorance? Their political positions and values are on the COMPLETE opposite of the spectrum! If you vote for Palin simply because of your gender, without doing proper research and making an educated decision, then you’re inadvertently hurting yourself and missing the point. If you get raped are you comfortable with a mandate that says you are forced to have the child? And the Republican stance on the gun laws is horrifying. It is truly baffling to me. If this tag-team wins, I’m headed to Toronto or London. And this is coming from an educated, hard-working young black woman who NEVER relies on the race card-just the humanity one.
- Posted by MelissaGMT: The only difference between Hillary and Obimbo is race and gender? What a joke…the main difference is that he is a fraud! That is more than enough to vote McCain/Palin.
- Posted by NewOrleansPumaOh and by the way, I should add the yes, without a doubt Hillary could out-debate (with one hand tied behind her back) either of these candidates on issues relative to The Economy.
- Posted by CindyLet me start with the fact, I have always voted.
- Posted by MARY SMITHThis year, I will not vote for the lesser of two evils.
If Hillary isn’t running, I won’t vote!!
This election is too important to treat it like a popularity contest that your candidate lost, and thus you will take revenge on the winner by voting for their opponent. Voting for McCain because you are ’sick of the Democrats’ and because Hillary Clinton lost the primary shows a complete lack of serious thought about the ramifications of your vote. McCain is the WRONG person for the job and will do great damage to our country, already in terrible trouble. Sarah palin is an opportunistic fanatic. Take a look at this video and see the real John McCain. Actual footage doesn’t lie—
- Posted by swing state bluesbloghttp://www.brasschecktv.com/page/325.htm l
Obama/Biden ‘O8!
For those wondering how former Clinton supporters could vote McCain, it’s called a Protest Vote. You can read about it on the PUMApac website. I’m a lifelong Democrat & former precinct worker, while personally I could not cast a vote for McCain I DO like Palin’s spunk and am NOT voting for Obama. All PUMA’s have different reasons, these are mine: can’t overlook Rezko ties, can’t overlook racist pastor(s) & black theology background, can’t overlook how sexism played out in the Obama camp & msm, can’t overlook his voting for FISA! EVEN IF I could, after going to Denver and seeing firsthand the delegate intimidation and hearing first hand about the Caucus Fraud, I could never cast my vote for a candidate who engaged in Fraud to narrowly steal the nomination from the more qualified candidate. There. I hope people aren’t saying “it’s unbelievable to me” anymore!
- Posted by CindyI do not understand how anyone who supported Senator Clinton can now vote for Senator McCain. There are so many issues they differ on and that are at stake. To name just a few: The Supreme Court could have as many as 3 judges step down which affects decisions that will impact the lives of our children and grandchildren around personal liberties including freedom of speech, gun laws, torture, choice, and on and on. The Democrats and Republicans are so far apart on so many issues: the economy, tax relief for the middle class, health care, etc. The choice is clear. What has happened to this country?
- Posted by Cynthia SeverinFor all those that say they were former Hillary supporters and are now Macain/Palin supporters, I’m sorry but I’m taking it for granted that you are just Republican comment trolls.
I would find it very surprising and sad that someone would now support a party that is the opposite of everything Hillary Clinton represents simply out of spite.
What sorry shape the US will be in if a party is elected based on these non-issues they keep trying to muddy the waters with. Lord help the republicans if it ever gets back to issues.
You know, little things like the economy, the war, nuclear treaties, the climate, etc
- Posted by JeffTo suggest a Clinton supporter would turn to Palin or a McCain/Palin ticket suggests the bulk of her supports are ignorant. I hope that’s not true as I wouldn’t want to find myself in that company. Yes we wanted Clinton…but we knew Barack would be the best second. Reverting to McCain means that people only wanted Clinton for her gender and nothing else; that’s shortsighted and ignorant. We wanted an intelligent qualified woman who could take our country from the brink to something greater than we are today. I pray that Obama wins and Hillary is put into a position with great impact. More so I pray that McCain and their disgusting entourage of lies lose; We cannot afford it!
- Posted by jONObama picked Biden because they will work together well and Biden brings amazing national security and foreign affairs knowledge and experience to the team. The biggest obstacle to picking Hillary was not Hillary but Bill. He has had a lot of business dealings that involve “interesting” parties to foreign governments and businessmen. He also does not do well sitting in the back seat - he likes to drive the situation and that doesn’t work well when you are not the president. Vetting Bill Clinton would also be a royal headache. The scandals from the past would all be brought to the forefront, as well as possible new ones as yet undisclosed. Hillary probably realizes these obstacles were in place and would pose more of a problem for Obama than would be good for the campaign and the Democrats fight for the White House. I am confident that Obama will offer Hillary an important position in his administration when he is elected.
- Posted by Chris in SeattleObama is going to lose, and you are going to be the Democratic Presidential candidate. My “vibes” tell me you will likely win.
- Posted by Nancy WeberSome call him maverick, I think “scary as hell” is more appropriate. He got on the change bandwagon like last week, someone must have told him that things really aren’t going well for the nations majority of people he is out of touch with. The only change I see with McCain is a more aggressive military style. He should be put in a nursing home, and not in charge of our country. He doesn’t want to build American, he wants to play an old mans game of chess with the world using our military. The problem is his global game of chess has drastically changed since he last played as a pon in Vietnam. Their intelligence is evident by their half-witted and fearless comments regarding taking a tough stance with Russia and Iran. With nuclear missles that will wipe out the whole f’n world, Johnny Cowboy and Palin still want to run our county the old way. Push and shove, arrogant and ignorant. He should go play tough guy in a nursing home, where he can hold the button that calls his nurse to change his diaper. Just keep him away from that presidency and the code to arm nuclear weapons, because he will hit the button.
- Posted by jmamswctThe Clintons’ hearts are only really into campaigning for themselves. This is the third presidential election since Bill left the White House, who have they campaigned for? Nobody, that’s who.
Don’t read Clintons’ lack of enthusiasm as any sort of reflection of the candidate. They just like to pout.
- Posted by CCIt’s unbelievable to me that anyone who supported Hilary can now support McCain/Palin - they could not be more different. If it were someone I knew, I’d question them about racism - the only real difference between most of Hilary’s positions and Obama’s is his race and her gender. Otherwise, they hold the same things dear - a woman’s right to decide what to do with her body, equal taxation instead of the rich getting breaks that everyone else pays for, keeping jobs in America instead of sending them overseas, taking care of those less fortunate, really improving education and health care for everyone, not just the rich. I truly don’t understand how anyone who supported Hilary can now support a team that is so much like Bush and Cheney that it gives me nightmares - look what they have done to this country!
- Posted by lucyblueIt’s great to see that people are coming together and finally focusing on the issues. The economy is the #1 issue, and Obama has a very strong plan to get the nation on track. It’s an exciting time for America with such a wise leader as Obama!
- Posted by MikeI just can’t believe it! I know Hillary is campaigning for him, but I am with Pat… her heart is just not in it. I wish she would DUMP the party, and go on the ballot as an independent. I can’t stomach Obama or Biden. And to think McCain & Paulin is the alternative is not any more comforting. Why does it always seem to come down to “the lesser of 2 evils”… Why can’t we end up with someone we are passionate about and who can and WILL get the job done.
Hillary- I know you are the RIGHT person for the job… man or woman… You have what it takes to get things back on track. Unfortunately, it seems we are going to have to suffer through another 4 years of stupidity and God only knows what else before you have another shot at getting things moving in the right direction. Plesae do not abandon your plight. We need you.
- Posted by ToriIt’s obvious that Hillary’s heart is not in campaigning for Mr. Magnificent - the amazing Mr. O. This former Hillary supporter is tired of the Democrat’s and ready for change that the Maverick’s will bring. McCain/Palin 08.
- Posted by Pat