Comments on: McCain to attend debate, Web ad claims victory already

By: Charles

Charles — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:11:38 +0000

Change you can trust, a slogan that could turn around McCain’s campaign?

Change you can trust contrasts beautifully with change you can believe in.

Everyone wants change, only with a team that we can trust to implement it.
If you’re in a tough spot, you want someone to come to help you that you can trust, not someone you believe may want to help you.

John McCain, polls show, is rated as highly qualified and highly trusted. This slogan, change you can trust, reinforces this message.

It can even be added on to John McCain’s current slogan. Country first, change you can trust. Or perhaps Change you can trust that puts Country first. Or how about Change you can trust that puts America first

It implies without directly saying it that the other side is perhaps a little less trustworthy.

It also reinforces the message that in a time we are facing battle with Al Qaeda worldwide and two conventional wars, John McCain is a commander in chief you can trust to lead us to victory.

There are 30 days left before Election Day. Sarah Palin’s debate performance was good, but it’s really up to John McCain to win.

CHANGE You Can TRUST

CHANGE You Can TRUST to put COUNTRY FIRST

CHANGE You Can TRUST to put AMERICA FIRST

CHANGE - TRUST
COUNTRY FIRST

John, are you listening???

http://strategicthought-charles77.blogsp ot.com/2008/10/change-you-can-trust-slog an-that-could.html

By: susan

susan — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:06:48 +0000

Both camps pre-produced an ad., just like at the super bowl do you think they have a machine in the back that produces the hats and stuff as soon as the game is over. The stuff is done ahead and who ever won, it gets passed out. Same here. It being printed prematurely was not a mistake I am sure- the WSJ is in Oboma’s pocket.

By: julie

julie — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:25:18 +0000

The fact is that he did win. You all are whining about some stupid ad because you are sore loosers.

By: Pat

Pat — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:31:22 +0000

McCain won that debate - for sure!

By: Joseph

Joseph — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 02:31:23 +0000

“McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said the ad posting was a mistake by the Wall Street”

I personally am for neither Mccain nor Obama, but if you die hard Obama supporters would l2 read, Mccain’s spokesman states it was a mistake.

By: Dano

Dano — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:43:34 +0000

McCain-Obama debate… McCain talked about his experience in the Senate with spending, yet does not know the different BASIC contract types in use by the US Government. “Fixed Cost” contracts do not exist. That …statement… by McCain is illustrative of what he doesn’t know. And I’m not an Obama fan.

By: Joshua K

Joshua K — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:17:37 +0000

Heh. MSNBC did it too.
http://tinyurl.com/5yjwwg

By: Presidential Debate: McCain v. Obama « media lizzy & friends

Presidential Debate: McCain v. Obama « media lizzy & friends — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:06:01 +0000

[...] our full reactions to the debate afterward, and we haven’t made up our minds as to just who won — yet. Our radio friends Maegan Carberry and Lizzy Blackney are twittering during the debate, and [...]

By: Theresa

Theresa — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:46:11 +0000

Amanda and NonAffiliated, please re-read the article. It clearly states that McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said the ad posting was a mistake by the Wall Street Journal. Ergo, it is NOT a fake.

By: jj

jj — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:35:59 +0000

Uh, it’s not fake. The McCain campaign admitted the mistake, blamed it on the WSJ.