<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Utilities vs banks: The evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/fundshub/2011/01/12/utilities-vs-banks-the-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fundshub/2011/01/12/utilities-vs-banks-the-evidence/</link>
	<description>Money managers under the microscope</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Dimmock</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fundshub/2011/01/12/utilities-vs-banks-the-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-2258</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Dimmock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fundshub/?p=4429#comment-2258</guid>
		<description>No.. well maybe. I&#039;d have to check. 
But I think we we&#039;re offering some evidence on the issues Patel raised without endorsing them -- we posted the chart to allow readers to draw their own conclusions. He probably does have a point about value creation vs pay, but his point about utilities CEOs making better bankers is clearly more provocative than practical. That said, it would be kinda fun to see what Bob Diamond would do with BG Group...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.. well maybe. I&#8217;d have to check.<br />
But I think we we&#8217;re offering some evidence on the issues Patel raised without endorsing them &#8212; we posted the chart to allow readers to draw their own conclusions. He probably does have a point about value creation vs pay, but his point about utilities CEOs making better bankers is clearly more provocative than practical. That said, it would be kinda fun to see what Bob Diamond would do with BG Group&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhdavis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/fundshub/2011/01/12/utilities-vs-banks-the-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-2256</link>
		<dc:creator>mhdavis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/fundshub/?p=4429#comment-2256</guid>
		<description>So from 1995 until 2006 Banks out preformed Utilities.
That&#039;s 11 years. 
From 2007 till 2010 Utilities outperformed Banks.
That&#039;s 4 years.
From 1987 to 1996 they appear from your graph to have performed the same
That&#039;s 9 Years.
So over 20 years Utilities have performed better for 20 percent of the time. 
That leaves 80 percent that they didn&#039;t
Did you write a similar article around 2001 or 2002 showing that Utilities underperformed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So from 1995 until 2006 Banks out preformed Utilities.<br />
That&#8217;s 11 years.<br />
From 2007 till 2010 Utilities outperformed Banks.<br />
That&#8217;s 4 years.<br />
From 1987 to 1996 they appear from your graph to have performed the same<br />
That&#8217;s 9 Years.<br />
So over 20 years Utilities have performed better for 20 percent of the time.<br />
That leaves 80 percent that they didn&#8217;t<br />
Did you write a similar article around 2001 or 2002 showing that Utilities underperformed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
