Funds Hub

Money managers under the microscope

Nov 23, 2009 02:38 EST
Nov 16, 2009 03:01 EST
Nov 5, 2009 05:39 EST

Fight Fight Fight!

Photo

For those tiring of the squabbling over the European Union’s AIFM directive, at least the rhetoric continues to impress.

The EU threat has certainly made pension funds more bullish, and this week they were threatening to gang up on “arrogant” hedgies to force through far stricter terms on performance fees. “Institutional investors are totally disillusioned with funds not delivering what was on the tin,” Philip Read, chairman of the British Coal scheme, told chastened managers at the Hedge 2009 conference.

And what’s this? Even the Welsh have waded in with an attack on what they see as needless bureaucracy from the directive.

But my favourite comments come from Anthony Hilton’s column in yesterday’s Evening Standard. He asks a “French mole” to explain the EU’s onslaught on the hedge fund industry when there is broad agreement that the hedgies were not to blame for the financial crisis. The mole does not disappoint.

“It’s like when there is someone in a pub that you have never liked. When a fight breaks out, you hit him anyway, not because he caused the fight, but because you have always wanted to.”

Sep 18, 2009 08:01 EDT

Dale Gabbert: Swedish massage hits the spot

Photo

Guest blogger Dale Gabbert heads the funds group in the London office of law firm Reed Smith. His practice covers hedge funds, private equity and property funds and he is the author of Hedge Funds, a legal guide published by Butterworths Lexis Nexis.

The views expressed here are entirely the author’s own and do not constitute Reuters’ point of view.

After the controversy surrounding the draft directive some perspective has returned as the Swedes take control of the EU Presidency and attempt to untangle the issues and build some consensus.

The Swedish intervention is timely and comes as the row gathers pace, with the UK government having finally entered the fray and accused the directive’s proponents of having “pandered to prejudices” and “tilted at mythical windmills”.

Considering the level of invective flying around, the Swedish paper is measured and concise. It identifies eleven main areas of focus and elaborates on the problems and some possible solutions (many of which are framed as alternatives).

  •