<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whose nanny was she?</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/03/28/whose-nanny-was-she/</link>
	<description>Reader reaction to Reuters news</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  7 Sep 2008 11:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: G. Goodyear</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/03/28/whose-nanny-was-she/#comment-334511</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Goodyear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/03/28/whose-nanny-was-she/#comment-334511</guid>
		<description>OK, so most of understood what you were trying to say. Is that an excuse for poor writing skills?? I am not a writer, but wow!!! I guess standards have really dropped at Reuters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so most of understood what you were trying to say. Is that an excuse for poor writing skills?? I am not a writer, but wow!!! I guess standards have really dropped at Reuters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C Abell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/03/28/whose-nanny-was-she/#comment-334505</link>
		<dc:creator>John C Abell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/03/28/whose-nanny-was-she/#comment-334505</guid>
		<description>Of course, the other story would have been much more interesting. But this isn't the Oddly Enough Blog, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the other story would have been much more interesting. But this isn&#8217;t the Oddly Enough Blog, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/03/28/whose-nanny-was-she/#comment-334494</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2008/03/28/whose-nanny-was-she/#comment-334494</guid>
		<description>Among the 39 photos you used in the report “Lhasa monks accuse China of lying over unrest", 5 photos were actually taken at Nepal, not in China (photo #15, 16, 17, 19, and 32).   This is a gross distortion of the real events.  Is this what you called journalism, of "being objective and fair"?  
I challenge you to correct your unprofessionalism and to apologize publically for the damage you have done.  Your biased report does more damage to the truth than to reveal it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the 39 photos you used in the report “Lhasa monks accuse China of lying over unrest&#8221;, 5 photos were actually taken at Nepal, not in China (photo #15, 16, 17, 19, and 32).   This is a gross distortion of the real events.  Is this what you called journalism, of &#8220;being objective and fair&#8221;?<br />
I challenge you to correct your unprofessionalism and to apologize publically for the damage you have done.  Your biased report does more damage to the truth than to reveal it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
