Comments on: Those Palin photos…

By: Robina

Robina — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:19:16 +0000

I see you choose to print only those hypocritical views that youy paper probably expouses. Taking a photo up a women’s legs is always SEXIST unless the ‘said’ person is a Democrat. This is very unpleasant.

In the Middle East and in many Muslim homes this is the image we get of the WEST. HYPOCRITICAL. Palin should wear a full cloak and cover herself (like Muslim women)in a country that women are held in full REGARD and EQUALITY.

By: Sam23

Sam23 — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 23:29:28 +0000

It’s a great photo representation of the true platform on which she stands. If she didn’t have half-way decent looks, she wouldn’t have a leg to stand on as a viable candidate. What comes out of her mouth is pure nonsense.

These pictures represent well the shallowness of her candidacy and the only thing she has to offer……comic and sexist relief.

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:23:42 +0000

i would also like to add that the one with the children is actually quite good, from an artistic point of view, its almost a metaphor for our childlike amazement with superficial aesthetics.

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:17:53 +0000

I think it’s funny that the conservatives freak out about this, yes palin has nice legs, and the photo is amusing because she is considered an attractive woman. if we cant have fun with all this then we might as well call up the thought police right now. i personally think she is pretty much evil, but i think this about most of the right these days, their blatant fascist rhetoric is astounding, I’ll be dancing around the block when Obama wins.

By: mjojan

mjojan — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:12:31 +0000

I heard about the pictures before I saw them. The photographer turned junk shots into moneymakers. The look of admiration is classic and captivating, I wonder who he will vote for? This kind of coverage makes me wonder if he put the camera on the stage and took a picture looking under her skirt?

By: Terri Monroe

Terri Monroe — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:12:19 +0000

I suggest that some of you folk need to get a sense of humour!!! I’m sure she is having a laugh at it, she has already achieved a huge success – talk about political correctness run wild – is it no longer possible for people to laugh at themselves?

From down under.

By: M

Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:51:52 +0000

What’s the big deal? It’s an interesting angle as well as an interesting study of the audience no matter who the legs belong to or whether they’re clad in trousers or tights.

By: Peter H

Peter H — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:43:30 +0000

It’s great to see a bit of creativity being used in what is a very tedious and predictable election campaign. Congratulations to the photographer for finding a new angle, kinda like looking up from the gutter, from where so many citizens will probably be viewing the world given the horrendous mess our leaders have made of the 21st century so far. And yes, from here they do look like great legs. Well done that photographer and the editor. Don’t let the short-sighted re-activists stop you.

By: Honesty

Honesty — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:17:24 +0000

What’s the heck? Give us a break. This is fun. Its a good foto. It shows strong and healthy leg.

Lighten up and see the good things in this foto. Some people just want to be upset at something; maybe because the campaign is not going well, maybe.

Palin displayed her legs and photographer took a shot. Learn something from Tina Turner. Take this as a compliment.

Let’s get over this whining and go back to discussing the important issues of this campaign.

By: syd

syd — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:40:56 +0000

she has great legs,no harm no foul.