Reuters Blogs

Good, Bad, and Ugly

Reader reaction to Reuters news

07:34 October 15th, 2008

Injecting an error?

Posted by: The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly Editor
Tags: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, ,

Selling frenzy persists, Dow down 25 pct in Oct

In U.S. equities, the Dow Jones slid as much as 8 percent to break below 8,000 for the first time since April 1, 2003, and bringing its losses for the week to more than 20 percent. Morgan Stanley, the No. 2 independent investment bank, plunged 37 percent on doubts that a planned $9 billion cash infection from Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc would be enough to enable it to ride out the current crisis.

Really, a cash “infection”?

I’ve been reading reuters regularly for several months now and almost every day I find some glaring, hardly accidental error like this, and then e-mail the correction to you. It undermines your credibility. If you need a damn editor, hire one. Hell I’ll do it.

Alex

Obviously we meant injection: GBU Editor

Join the Facebook Good, Bad, Ugly Blog Network

2 comments so far

Who misses the Editors Notes at the top of the Reuters “Before the Bell” emails sent each morning? I do..

- Posted by IK

Obviously we are not all good typists and sometimes forget to spellcheck. I enjoy finding the errors. It make me glad it at least started with a human. Unfortunately the infusion of funds is not at a level to correct the immediate problem and the time will allow those who have to make a great deal of fast cash while not solveing the problem. Eventually the swing between sales and buys of the stocks will get small enough to be eaten up by the broker fee. Until then there is no reason to believe the credit situation will improve.

- Posted by mjojan

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.