Good, Bad, and Ugly

Reader reaction to Reuters news

Mopping up…

Indian commandos mop up last of Mumbai militants

“Mop Up” is a disgusting headline. Regardless of what has been done this is human you are talking, about not floor grime. Leave the repugnant demeaning of human life to asinine editorialists please.

Tim

Several readers objected to this headline, though I don’t fully understand why. My online dictionary says MOP UP: Military. to clear (ground, trenches, towns, etc.) of scattered or remaining enemy combatants after attacking forces have conquered the area. GBU Editor.

The Taj Mahal hotel is seen engulfed in smoke during a gun battle in Mumbai November 29, 2008. REUTERS/Arko Datta

Join the Facebook Good, Bad, Ugly Blog Network

Comments

What about the word “militant” being used to describe these individuals. If these are not terrorists, what are?

Posted by Earl | Report as abusive
 

But the point is the military tends to use sanitized language to conceal the human cost of their actions, and I don’t think journalists should allow them to get away with that by adopting the language. Like “pacify”, which was used to generally mean something along the lines of “kill everyone resisting by any means possible”. Same with “mop up,” “collateral damage,” etc. Let’s call killing killing.

Posted by Aziz | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •