Reader reaction to Reuters news
No bones about it…
Bones found in California kidnap case probably old
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – Bone slivers found near the home of a California man accused of kidnapping Jaycee Dugard and holding her for 18 years did not yield human DNA and are probably old Native American remains, police said on Friday.
“The DOJ Bureau of Forensic Services was not able to recover human DNA from any of the bone fragments,” Contra Costa County Sheriff’s spokesman Jimmy Lee said. “A forensic anthropologist says the bones are probably human, old and likely Native American.”
This article presents misleading information. The article says “for 18 years did not yield human DNA and are probably old Native American remains, police said on Friday.”
Problem: Are Native American remains not Human?
The article reads as if Native Americans are not human and is disrespectful. Thank you for your time.
Al, an Archaeologist
It would have been clearer from the start if the lead had not used the word human. However, a quote in the story, “A forensic anthropologist says the bones are probably human, old and likely Native American,” makes it very clear that Native American bones are human bones: GBU Editor