Reuters Blogs

Good, Bad, and Ugly

Reader reaction to Reuters news

10:56 October 29th, 2009

Many believe?

Posted by: Robert Basler
Tags: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, , , ,

Israeli police, Arabs clash near Jerusalem mosque

The compound is revered by Jews as the Temple Mount, where many believe the Jewish Temple stood until it was destroyed by the Romans in 70 A.D.

My 10 year old niece and I were working on a homework assignment yesterday. We saw the original MSNBC article (crediting Reuters for some of the reporting) with the astonishing phrase that “many people believe” that Temple Mount was the home of the ancient temple in Jerusalem.

When the article was “updated” at 2:15 PM, this phrase was curiously removed. Even more interesting was when we found the Reuters version of the article wherein it states, “The compound is revered by Jews as the Temple Mount, where the two destroyed biblical temples once stood.” This is a pretty radically different sentence than “many people believe….” and makes it clear that the existence of the biblical temples on this precise spot is a historical fact.

How does this happen? Was it a MSNBC editorial decision to change the phrasing in their original post (and then quickly retreat when they realized they had egg on their faces)?

Allyn

The “many people believe” phrase was included in our original version of the story, but we removed it from the later update you found.

We normally write that Jews revere the Temple Mount as the site of two destroyed Biblical temples: GBU Editor

A Palestinian woman shouts at Israeli police during clashes in Jerusalem’s Old City October 25, 2009.  REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun

Join the Good, Bad, Ugly Facebook Blog Network

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.