<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Never say Never say Never&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2011/11/15/never-say-never-say-never/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2011/11/15/never-say-never-say-never/</link>
	<description>Reader reaction to Reuters news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:49:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael-M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/2011/11/15/never-say-never-say-never/comment-page-1/#comment-347612</link>
		<dc:creator>michael-M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/gbu/?p=20265#comment-347612</guid>
		<description>I agree that Wikipedia should not be the definitive source, especially as a journalistic source.  Wikipedia is the people&#039;s encyclopedia and is known to use tabloid articles, those well researched stories, as it&#039;s source of reference...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Wikipedia should not be the definitive source, especially as a journalistic source.  Wikipedia is the people&#8217;s encyclopedia and is known to use tabloid articles, those well researched stories, as it&#8217;s source of reference&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
