Opinion

George Chen

Journalist, or analyst?

Dec 21, 2010 01:26 EST
We all know how hot the job market is these days in the Chinese financial industry, and with almost every hirer facing the question of where to find enough smart people to fill  those openings, some banks are trawling an alternative talent pool — financial journalists.
In fact, the media industry has been a talent source for fund houses and investment banks for some time, but mostly for public relations- or marketing-related roles.
Talk to a spokesperson for a big bank such as Citigroup or Morgan Stanley, and you shouldn’t be surprised to learn she or he once worked for a leading media organisation before moving to the so-called “dark side”.
More recently, some banks are starting to realise that journalist can handle more than PR. What about  as economists or analysts to study monetary policy and capital markets for big global banks in China?
The head of China research at a British bank recently sent an email to his friends advising that the bank was looking for a China economist and researcher to join his fast-expanding team in Shanghai or Beijing. Besides a basic financial and economics-related educational background, the notice highlighted one condition that the ideal candidate would meet.
“We are looking for candidates with either a decent advanced (i.e. post-graduate) degree in economics and/or with a strong background in journalism/industry research in China. We view a journalist’s eye for a story and ability to work out how particular policies work in practice in China as strengths,” the hirer said in the note, which was widely distributed among financial journalists in China this week.
Separately, at almost the same time, the China research team leader at a big European investment bank also published a new job notice for China stock analysts, and asked his colleagues to spread the word, especially among their financial media friends. Among the requirements, the hirer pointed out that the applicant should demonstrate excellent writing skills, especially for analytical articles.
As far as I know, not too many journalists have MBAs, which are often considered an entry ticket for a career in investment banking or asset management. For roles such as economist at a big bank, a PhD used to be a basic requirement, but in a developing market such as China, do people really want to make things a bit easier?
Given China’s immature market environment, the right information and fast access to key economic data are becoming more important for economists and analysts, whose reputations rely on the credibility of their forecasts and a sensitivity to market trends (ahead of their competitors).
Such work often relies on an extensive network of contacts in different industries and ministries across the vast nation.
Meanwhile, in China’s capital markets, rumours are often proved to be true. For example, about two weeks ahead of the release of official data early this month, the stock market in Shanghai was already full of talk and speculation that inflation November would reach a new high of 5.1 percent.
Guess who is usually among the first to hear these rumours? Good financial journalists with strong ties with government sources.
Some industry watchers have observed that economists in China are becoming more like newsbreaking, investigative journalists. Remember Beijing’s surprise announcement of a 4 trillion yuan (about 586 billion U.S. dollars at that time) stimulus package in late 2008 to help maintain economic expansion amid the global financial crisis? To some clients of a big U.S. bank, the announcement may not have been very surprising as they had learned of the plan from the bank’s economist, who had tapped well-placed sources in Beijing for intelligence.
Perhaps  a good China economist can someday teach at Columbia Journalism School when he feels he earns enough money? By the same token, a financial journalist could also teach MBA students how to develop a source network in China.

Art HK 09By George Chen
The opinions expressed are the author’s own.

We all know how hot the job market is these days in the Chinese financial industry, and with almost every hirer facing the question of where to find enough smart people to fill those openings, some banks are trawling an alternative talent pool — financial journalists.

In fact, the media industry has been a talent source for fund houses and investment banks for some time, but mostly for public relations- or marketing-related roles.

Talk to a spokesperson for a big bank such as Citigroup or Morgan Stanley, and you shouldn’t be surprised to learn she or he once worked for a leading media organisation before moving to the so-called “dark side”.

More recently, some banks are starting to realise that journalist can handle more than PR. What about as economists or analysts to study monetary policy and capital markets for big global banks in China?

The head of China research at a British bank recently sent an email to his friends advising that the bank was looking for a China economist and researcher to join his fast-expanding team in Shanghai or Beijing. Besides a basic financial and economics-related educational background, the notice highlighted one condition that the ideal candidate would meet.

“We are looking for candidates with either a decent advanced (i.e. post-graduate) degree in economics and/or with a strong background in journalism/industry research in China. We view a journalist’s eye for a story and ability to work out how particular policies work in practice in China as strengths,” the hirer said in the note, which was widely distributed among financial journalists in China this week.

Separately, at almost the same time, the China research team leader at a big European investment bank also published a new job notice for China stock analysts in Beijing, and asked his colleagues to spread the word, especially among their financial media friends. Among the requirements, the hirer pointed out that the applicant should demonstrate excellent writing skills, especially for analytical articles.

As far as I know, not too many journalists have MBAs, which are often considered an entry ticket for a career in investment banking or asset management. For roles such as economist at a big bank, a PhD used to be a basic requirement, but in a developing market such as China, do people really want to make things a bit easier?

Given China’s immature market environment, the right information and fast access to key economic data are becoming more important for economists and analysts, whose reputations rely on the credibility of their forecasts and a sensitivity to market trends (ahead of their competitors).

Such work often relies on an extensive network of contacts in different industries and ministries across the vast nation.

Meanwhile, in China’s capital markets, rumours are often proved to be true. For example, about two weeks ahead of the release of official data early this month, the stock market in Shanghai was already full of talk and speculation that inflation in November would reach a new high of 5.1 percent on year.

Guess who is usually among the first to hear these rumours? Good financial journalists with strong ties with government sources.

Some industry watchers have observed that economists in China are becoming more like newsbreaking, investigative journalists. Remember Beijing’s surprise announcement of a 4 trillion yuan (about 586 billion U.S. dollars at that time) stimulus package in late 2008 to help maintain economic expansion amid the global financial crisis?

To some clients of a big U.S. bank, the announcement may not have been very surprising as they had learned of the plan from the bank’s economist, who had tapped his well-placed sources in Beijing for intelligence.

Perhaps, a good China economist can someday teach at Columbia Journalism School when he feels he earns enough money? By the same token, a financial journalist could also teach MBA students how to develop a source network in China.

George Chen is a Reuters editor and columnist based in Hong Kong.

Photo: A visitor walks by a modern painting shown at an art exhibition in Hong Kong on May 17, 2009. REUTERS/George Chen

COMMENT

The comment by “Samuelshen” is fair comment and cannot be improved by combination of jobs i.e journalist and analyst. That said, I remember the old days where fund managers displayed their PhDs, and other professional qualifications to give the investing public confidence. As they said, investors and fund managers must be ahead of the curve. But journalist?? Just reported the facts from underlying sources (with some clever manipulation?) and with comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.
PHLee

Posted by lphock | Report as abusive

Ferragamo for Morgan Stanley, a good match?

Dec 2, 2010 03:30 EST
By George Chen
The opinions expressed are the author’s own.

Salvatore Ferragamo

By George Chen
The opinions expressed are the author’s own.

Hong Kong is a real shopping paradise where people in the financial industry apparently have privileges not just because they can probably afford to buy more top brands, but they can also buy them exclusively and at a discount, at least for this Christmas.

This week, an email from Italian luxury maker Salvatore Ferragamo, exclusively inviting Morgan Stanley staff in Hong Kong to join its pre-Christmas sale, has caught the attention of their jealous peers at rival banks.

With the exclusive invitation, a Morgan Stanley employee in Hong Kong could visit a store of Salvatore Ferragamo in the former British colony to buy its bags, shoes, belts or other luxury products at a special discount  before the items were put on sale for the public.

“Please present the business card of Morgan Stanley before making your purchase,” Salvatore Ferragamo said in the invitation.

My Morgan Stanley friends in Hong Kong told me they didn’t remember such promotions last Christmas when everybody in the financial industry was still deeply worried about a “double dip” and unsure when the end of the financial crisis might come. This year is quite different. At least Salvatore Ferragamo seems certain the buying power of Morgan Stanley’s staff should have now recovered.

In fact, financial professionals at other banks and funds such as Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and Nomura in Hong Kong have also received many coupons and invitations to join various pre-Christmas sales events. Those  usually will be extended to the general public afterwards, but by then consumers might complain that the choice of products is limited.

Just this week alone, there will be a so-called “Bargain Sale” for Christian Dior fans in Hong Kong, with up to 70 percent discounts for selected handbags. At the same time, Furla will run a “Showroom Sample Sale” event in Causeway Bay, one of Hong Kong’s busiest shopping areas. Of course, those events are by invitation only, and guess who gets the invitations? From the information I get from my friends in the banking and fund industry, they are the target audience.

I asked a friend who works for the Hong Kong government if she also gets such invitations. “Rarely. And I got them only because my friends in the banking industry forwarded those emails to me. Of course I am not their target clients,” she replied.

The exclusive invitation from Salvatore Ferragamo for Morgan Stanley staff in Hong Kong makes my friends working for local brokerages and banks envious. “Why Morgan Stanley? I think they are rich enough and won’t care about a 20 or 30 percent discount. I am definitely more price sensitive than they are,” said an analyst working for the Hong Kong office of a big Chinese bank.

Ferragamo, does it make sense? As of this posting, Ferragamo had not responded to an emailed request for comment.

George Chen is a Reuters editor and columnist based in Hong Kong.

Photo: A pre-sale invitation from Salvatore Ferragamo for Morgan Stanley staff in Hong Kong, obtained by Reuters on November 30, 2010

COMMENT

today is 2nd Dec, still have time to call my friend at Morgan stanley and go shopping @ SF!! thanks for reminding, george!

Posted by billylo | Report as abusive

The season of hiring in China

Nov 29, 2010 01:10 EST

HSBC/

HSBC/The season of hiring in China
By George Chen
The opinions expressed are the author’s own.
As we enter the last few weeks of 2010, we’re gladdened to hear news of increased hiring in Asia, in particular in China – suggesting a promising business outlook for the coming year. Otherwise, why bother hiring?
On November 24, Barclays Wealth, a unit of British banking giant Barclays, outlined an ambitious expansion plan to double the number of private bankers in Asia and quadruple its assets under management in the region over the next four years. In addition, Barclays is going to set up a booking centre in Hong Kong to get even closer to its top-end China clients.
This is not Barclays’ first attempt to grab talent from rivals this year. Its aggressive hiring plan has already raised tensions with Morgan Stanley in the equities, foreign exchange trading and investment banking arenas.
Just few months ago, Barclays successfully lobbied a number of China-focused M&A bankers in Asia to defect from Morgan Stanley. Such moves, especially for a group of people rather than one or two in few months, caused quite a buzz in Hong Kong’s financial community at the time. This time, Barclays wants to snag more private banking and asset management professionals. Who should be watching out?
In Asia, smaller banks such as Standard Chartered and DBS Group are furiously expanding, with more wealth likely to be generated in the region powered by the economies of China, India and Indonesia.
Even market leader HSBC is trying hard to expand its private banking team to further consolidate its position in Asia.
Have you seen the hiring ads posted all over Hong Kong? These banks are usually believed to offer less competitive compensation than rivals such as Barclays and Goldman Sachs, which are known for more generous payrolls, but also for longer working hours and higher pressure in the office.
No wonder HSBC just few weeks ago decided to give senior staff in Asia a huge incentive boost, raising salaries by as much as double. At the end of the day it’s up to you, Mr. or Ms. Talent — what do you really want? More money? Or a more comfortable working environment? Remember the old saying: you cannot have your cake and eat it.
And how can we forget Citibank, once the world’s largest financial services provider? The U.S. banking giant is now apparently paying more attentions to the fast growing rich Chinese customers and bigger Chinese corporate. The bank wants to double personnel in China to 10,000 over three years, according to a report by Japan’s business daily Nikkei on November 25.
When the news about Citibank’s hiring plan in China came out, Chinese netizens showed some doubts about it. They asked online if Citibank can afford competitive compensations in China like what they offer Citi staff in the West. To work for a foreign bank in China is no longer something a young graduate may be really proud of. In terms of payroll, you should not be surprised to see a junior clerk at Bank of China in Shanghai earns roughly 5,000 yuan (750 U.S. dollar) per month, even more than what his peer can get at Standard Chartered in the country’s financial hub.
On the other hand, it’s certainly a good thing to see the financial world recovering. Nobody wants to see another year of market panic in 2011. However, let’s hope the pace of expansion is a reasonable one.
You get more staff and you focus on better service quality better, right? Oops! To be honest, I haven’t received a call from my HSBC account manager for almost a year, and I only learned from the online banking system that my account manager has changed twice in the past six months.
Of course, I’m just one of many among its small clients in Hong Kong.

George Chen is a Reuters editor and columnBy George Chen

By George Chen

By George Chen
The opinions expressed are the author’s own.

As we enter the last few weeks of 2010, we’re gladdened to hear news of increased hiring in Asia, in particular in China – suggesting a promising business outlook for the coming year. Otherwise, why bother hiring?

On November 24, Barclays Wealth, a unit of British banking giant Barclays, outlined an ambitious expansion plan to double the number of private bankers in Asia and quadruple its assets under management in the region over the next four years. In addition, Barclays is going to set up a booking center in Hong Kong to get even closer to its top-end China clients.

This is not Barclays’ first attempt to grab talent from rivals this year. Its aggressive hiring plan has already raised tensions with Morgan Stanley in the equities, foreign exchange trading and investment banking arenas.

Just a few months ago, Barclays successfully lobbied a number of China-focused M&A bankers in Asia to defect from Morgan Stanley. Such moves, especially for a group of people rather than one or two over a few months, caused quite a buzz in Hong Kong’s financial community at the time. This time, Barclays wants to snag more private banking and asset management professionals. Who should be watching out?

In Asia, smaller banks such as Standard Chartered and DBS Group are furiously expanding, with more wealth likely to be generated in the region powered by the economies of China, India and Indonesia.

Even market leader HSBC is trying hard to expand its private banking team to further consolidate its position in Asia.

Have you seen the hiring ads posted all over Hong Kong? These banks are usually believed to offer less competitive compensation than rivals such as Barclays and Goldman Sachs, which are known for more generous payrolls, but also for longer working hours and higher pressure in the office.

No wonder HSBC just a few weeks ago decided to give senior staff in Asia a huge incentive boost, raising salaries by as much as double. At the end of the day it’s up to you, Mr. or Ms. Talent — what do you really want? More money? Or a more comfortable working environment? Remember the old saying: you cannot have your cake and eat it too.

And how can we forget Citibank, once the world’s largest financial services provider? The U.S. banking giant is now apparently paying more attention to the fast growing rich Chinese customers and bigger Chinese companies. The bank wants to double personnel in China to 10,000 over three years, according to a report by Japan’s business daily Nikkei on November 25.

When the news about Citibank’s hiring plan in China came out, Chinese netizens showed some skepticism. They asked online if Citibank can afford competitive compensation in China similar to what they offer Citi staff in the West. To work for a foreign bank in China is no longer something a young graduate necessarily covets ahead of other opportunities. In terms of payroll, you should not be surprised to see a junior clerk at Bank of China in Shanghai earning roughly 5,000 yuan (750 U.S. dollar) per month, even more than what his peer can get at Standard Chartered in the country’s financial hub.

On the other hand, it’s certainly a good thing to see the financial world recovering. Nobody wants to see another market panic in 2011. Let’s just hope the pace of expansion is reasonable.

Higher salaries means banks attract better people and can offer better quality service, right? Oops! To be honest, I haven’t received a call from my HSBC account manager for almost a year, and I only learned from the online banking system that my account manager has changed twice in the past six months.

Of course, I’m just one of many among its small clients in Hong Kong.

George Chen is a Reuters editor and columnist based in Hong Kong.

Photo: The HSBC headquarters is reflected in a commercial building in Hong Kong January 18, 2009. REUTERS/Bobby Yip

COMMENT

china is booming, bull market coming soon?? who knows??

KBT

Posted by arrowanartg | Report as abusive
  •