Opinion

George Chen

Income gap matters

Apr 11, 2011 23:07 EDT

PaulsonBy George Chen
The opinions expressed are the author’s own.

We’ve been talking about accelerating inflation for some time, and it has resulted in another tough issue for the government to address — with much care — the growing income gap between rich and poor.

Income disparities in some affluent cities such as Hong Kong have apparently reached a critical point, with frequent protests in the former British colony. Last weekend, a group of the so-called post-1980 generation of young people went to Central to protest the wealth imbalance. They even attempted to break into Cheung Kong Centre before the police arrived and stopped them.

They viewed Cheung Kong Centre, home to many large banks like Barclays Plc and BNP Paribas, as well as the offices of Li Ka-shing, Asia’s richest and also the city’s most powerful man, as a symbol of the imbalance. I was told by friends in mainland China that a similar anti-rich atmosphere is also brewing fast in big cities like Beijing and Shanghai, where relatively poorer people are complaining about inflation, especially rising property prices and rents.

When investors feel more confident about returning to the Shanghai and Hong Kong markets as the economic impact of the Japan earthquake and nuclear crisis eases, some people predict the income gap issue may change the whole game if the central and local governments fail to address the increasing social unrest.

Does this make sense? Income gap is considered by some political scientists as one of the key causes to the recent popular revolt in the Middle East, the “Jasmine Revolution”, which already made Egypt a difference.

Local media reported that some Hong Kong lawmakers and businessmen joked that Hong Kong was “a city of protests” — in addition to the unexpected protest at Cheung Kong Centre, there were at least two other high-profile public protests in the city last weekend, potentially damaging Hong Kong’s image as a stable global business and financial centre.

If global investors lose confidence in Hong Kong, it would be certainly a lose-lose result for both the rich and the poor. Last night, former U.S. Treasury Secretary and ex-Chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs Henry Paulson gave a talk at the University of Hong Kong. In response to a HKU student’s question, Paulson acknowledged that the income gap in the United States was also something the government needed to focus on.

Income gaps in different regions may need different solutions, said Paulson, adding that skills training and education were needed in the U.S.

However, he didn’t offer any specific advice for China. I wonder if Paulson just wanted to be diplomatic, or he may not really have an answer. He did say China’s economy was a very complicated matter and was becoming more complicated as it expanded.

The bigger the economy, the larger income gap? That doesn’t sound like a win-win deal for anyone.

George Chen is a Reuters editor and columnist based in Hong Kong. He’s also a part-time post-graduate student, studying international relations at the University of Hong Kong.

Photo: A protest sticker seen on the poster of Henry Paulson’s talk about global economy and U.S.-China relations at the University of Hong Kong on April 11, 2011 Reuters/George Chen

COMMENT

Thank you for this article George. Have you written about the recent truck drivers’ blockade/strike at one of the ports servicing Shanghai last week? What were the causes? I suspect they’re not too dissimilar to those leading to protests in HK, but the eventual ‘explosion’ will be even more dire on the mainland.

What is China’s corrupt Government doing to address the very depressing conditions for the majority of China’s population? And, yes, I am including the lower and middle middle-class, who cannot afford to buy a home in the cities in which they live and work, and who find the value of their modest savings being reduced on a daily basis.

Posted by NueWurldOrdaa | Report as abusive

Firing and hiring

Mar 31, 2011 22:39 EDT

GS

By George Chen
The opinions expressed are the author’s own.

Today is April Fools’ Day, a rare opportunity to make fun of friends and colleagues with pranks and practical jokes. Ever ahead of the game, Goldman Sachs produced an amusing mistake yesterday making it look more than a little foolish, as many investors and rival bankers may attest.

The bank’s Asia structured products unit said yesterday that trading in four index warrants it issued in relation to the Nikkei 225 was abruptly suspended in Hong Kong because of errors in supplemental listing documents. The formula of “cash settlement amount per board lot” for the warrants was misstated, Goldman Sachs Structured Products (Asia) Ltd said in a filing with the Hong Kong stock exchange. Click here to read the Goldman Sachs statement (PDF).

Before being suspended, the warrants surged by between 130 and 1,077 percent on Thursday morning, which local media reported could cost the bank millions of dollars.

Well, I understand it’s still a small figure to a bank like Goldman Sachs, although the story was certainly the most widely talked about matter in the equities world yesterday. Traders said this was a rare mistake that once again raised concern about the understanding of banks in relation to sophisticated financial products.

I am a bit worried about the fate of the Goldman Sachs bankers responsible for those Nikkei warrant errors. Should they be fired? Perhaps. It’s indeed embarrassing for Goldman Sachs and the timing is perfect — a day before the Fools’ Day — although this, sadly, was not a joke.

Or am I worrying excessively? The financial crisis is apparently over and there are good days ahead for investment banking professionals — at least those who work on China matters. Swiss bank UBS, the Asia-Pacific leader in equity underwriting, plans to double its China headcount over three to four years as it expands stock research coverage to small and medium-sized companies in China, the bank’s co-chief executive for the region said on Thursday.

Chi-Won Yoon, co-chairman and co-chief executive of UBS in the region, said at a forum in Hong Kong yesterday that the next real growth area for UBS in China would be small to medium-sized companies. I think this makes a lot of sense.

After the huge IPOs from the likes of Agricultural Bank of China in Hong Kong, we may not see many $10 billion and $20 billion deals for a while. Bankers are now talking about how “small is beautiful”, making deals and fundraising more workable and affordable to investors. Private businesses in China already contribute far more than half of national GDP growth annually.

But let’s not rush. I’m happy to teach Goldman Sachs bankers an old Chinese saying: “More haste, less speed” (欲速则不达 yu su ze bu da), as I believe a lesson should be taken from yesterday’s foolish mistake. The news of UBS hiring more China researchers should make rivals nervous.

After all, the financial industry is still short of talent, especially China experts. So is the media industry. A banker friend once asked me, these days if you know China, you speak Chinese and you have good communications skills, why not be a banker rather than a journalist and earn more money?

Good question.

George Chen is a Reuters editor and columnist based in Hong Kong.

Photo: Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO Lloyd Blankfein testifies before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Investigations Subcommittee hearing on “Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: The Role of Investment Banks” on Capitol Hill in Washington April 27, 2010. REUTERS/Jason Reed

COMMENT

China is facing a US consumer backlash. If I were a Chinese exporter, I would be very worried.

Posted by M.C.McBride | Report as abusive

Journalist, or analyst?

Dec 21, 2010 01:26 EST
We all know how hot the job market is these days in the Chinese financial industry, and with almost every hirer facing the question of where to find enough smart people to fill  those openings, some banks are trawling an alternative talent pool — financial journalists.
In fact, the media industry has been a talent source for fund houses and investment banks for some time, but mostly for public relations- or marketing-related roles.
Talk to a spokesperson for a big bank such as Citigroup or Morgan Stanley, and you shouldn’t be surprised to learn she or he once worked for a leading media organisation before moving to the so-called “dark side”.
More recently, some banks are starting to realise that journalist can handle more than PR. What about  as economists or analysts to study monetary policy and capital markets for big global banks in China?
The head of China research at a British bank recently sent an email to his friends advising that the bank was looking for a China economist and researcher to join his fast-expanding team in Shanghai or Beijing. Besides a basic financial and economics-related educational background, the notice highlighted one condition that the ideal candidate would meet.
“We are looking for candidates with either a decent advanced (i.e. post-graduate) degree in economics and/or with a strong background in journalism/industry research in China. We view a journalist’s eye for a story and ability to work out how particular policies work in practice in China as strengths,” the hirer said in the note, which was widely distributed among financial journalists in China this week.
Separately, at almost the same time, the China research team leader at a big European investment bank also published a new job notice for China stock analysts, and asked his colleagues to spread the word, especially among their financial media friends. Among the requirements, the hirer pointed out that the applicant should demonstrate excellent writing skills, especially for analytical articles.
As far as I know, not too many journalists have MBAs, which are often considered an entry ticket for a career in investment banking or asset management. For roles such as economist at a big bank, a PhD used to be a basic requirement, but in a developing market such as China, do people really want to make things a bit easier?
Given China’s immature market environment, the right information and fast access to key economic data are becoming more important for economists and analysts, whose reputations rely on the credibility of their forecasts and a sensitivity to market trends (ahead of their competitors).
Such work often relies on an extensive network of contacts in different industries and ministries across the vast nation.
Meanwhile, in China’s capital markets, rumours are often proved to be true. For example, about two weeks ahead of the release of official data early this month, the stock market in Shanghai was already full of talk and speculation that inflation November would reach a new high of 5.1 percent.
Guess who is usually among the first to hear these rumours? Good financial journalists with strong ties with government sources.
Some industry watchers have observed that economists in China are becoming more like newsbreaking, investigative journalists. Remember Beijing’s surprise announcement of a 4 trillion yuan (about 586 billion U.S. dollars at that time) stimulus package in late 2008 to help maintain economic expansion amid the global financial crisis? To some clients of a big U.S. bank, the announcement may not have been very surprising as they had learned of the plan from the bank’s economist, who had tapped well-placed sources in Beijing for intelligence.
Perhaps  a good China economist can someday teach at Columbia Journalism School when he feels he earns enough money? By the same token, a financial journalist could also teach MBA students how to develop a source network in China.

Art HK 09By George Chen
The opinions expressed are the author’s own.

We all know how hot the job market is these days in the Chinese financial industry, and with almost every hirer facing the question of where to find enough smart people to fill those openings, some banks are trawling an alternative talent pool — financial journalists.

In fact, the media industry has been a talent source for fund houses and investment banks for some time, but mostly for public relations- or marketing-related roles.

Talk to a spokesperson for a big bank such as Citigroup or Morgan Stanley, and you shouldn’t be surprised to learn she or he once worked for a leading media organisation before moving to the so-called “dark side”.

More recently, some banks are starting to realise that journalist can handle more than PR. What about as economists or analysts to study monetary policy and capital markets for big global banks in China?

The head of China research at a British bank recently sent an email to his friends advising that the bank was looking for a China economist and researcher to join his fast-expanding team in Shanghai or Beijing. Besides a basic financial and economics-related educational background, the notice highlighted one condition that the ideal candidate would meet.

“We are looking for candidates with either a decent advanced (i.e. post-graduate) degree in economics and/or with a strong background in journalism/industry research in China. We view a journalist’s eye for a story and ability to work out how particular policies work in practice in China as strengths,” the hirer said in the note, which was widely distributed among financial journalists in China this week.

Separately, at almost the same time, the China research team leader at a big European investment bank also published a new job notice for China stock analysts in Beijing, and asked his colleagues to spread the word, especially among their financial media friends. Among the requirements, the hirer pointed out that the applicant should demonstrate excellent writing skills, especially for analytical articles.

As far as I know, not too many journalists have MBAs, which are often considered an entry ticket for a career in investment banking or asset management. For roles such as economist at a big bank, a PhD used to be a basic requirement, but in a developing market such as China, do people really want to make things a bit easier?

Given China’s immature market environment, the right information and fast access to key economic data are becoming more important for economists and analysts, whose reputations rely on the credibility of their forecasts and a sensitivity to market trends (ahead of their competitors).

Such work often relies on an extensive network of contacts in different industries and ministries across the vast nation.

Meanwhile, in China’s capital markets, rumours are often proved to be true. For example, about two weeks ahead of the release of official data early this month, the stock market in Shanghai was already full of talk and speculation that inflation in November would reach a new high of 5.1 percent on year.

Guess who is usually among the first to hear these rumours? Good financial journalists with strong ties with government sources.

Some industry watchers have observed that economists in China are becoming more like newsbreaking, investigative journalists. Remember Beijing’s surprise announcement of a 4 trillion yuan (about 586 billion U.S. dollars at that time) stimulus package in late 2008 to help maintain economic expansion amid the global financial crisis?

To some clients of a big U.S. bank, the announcement may not have been very surprising as they had learned of the plan from the bank’s economist, who had tapped his well-placed sources in Beijing for intelligence.

Perhaps, a good China economist can someday teach at Columbia Journalism School when he feels he earns enough money? By the same token, a financial journalist could also teach MBA students how to develop a source network in China.

George Chen is a Reuters editor and columnist based in Hong Kong.

Photo: A visitor walks by a modern painting shown at an art exhibition in Hong Kong on May 17, 2009. REUTERS/George Chen

COMMENT

The comment by “Samuelshen” is fair comment and cannot be improved by combination of jobs i.e journalist and analyst. That said, I remember the old days where fund managers displayed their PhDs, and other professional qualifications to give the investing public confidence. As they said, investors and fund managers must be ahead of the curve. But journalist?? Just reported the facts from underlying sources (with some clever manipulation?) and with comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.
PHLee

Posted by lphock | Report as abusive

The season of hiring in China

Nov 29, 2010 01:10 EST

HSBC/

HSBC/The season of hiring in China
By George Chen
The opinions expressed are the author’s own.
As we enter the last few weeks of 2010, we’re gladdened to hear news of increased hiring in Asia, in particular in China – suggesting a promising business outlook for the coming year. Otherwise, why bother hiring?
On November 24, Barclays Wealth, a unit of British banking giant Barclays, outlined an ambitious expansion plan to double the number of private bankers in Asia and quadruple its assets under management in the region over the next four years. In addition, Barclays is going to set up a booking centre in Hong Kong to get even closer to its top-end China clients.
This is not Barclays’ first attempt to grab talent from rivals this year. Its aggressive hiring plan has already raised tensions with Morgan Stanley in the equities, foreign exchange trading and investment banking arenas.
Just few months ago, Barclays successfully lobbied a number of China-focused M&A bankers in Asia to defect from Morgan Stanley. Such moves, especially for a group of people rather than one or two in few months, caused quite a buzz in Hong Kong’s financial community at the time. This time, Barclays wants to snag more private banking and asset management professionals. Who should be watching out?
In Asia, smaller banks such as Standard Chartered and DBS Group are furiously expanding, with more wealth likely to be generated in the region powered by the economies of China, India and Indonesia.
Even market leader HSBC is trying hard to expand its private banking team to further consolidate its position in Asia.
Have you seen the hiring ads posted all over Hong Kong? These banks are usually believed to offer less competitive compensation than rivals such as Barclays and Goldman Sachs, which are known for more generous payrolls, but also for longer working hours and higher pressure in the office.
No wonder HSBC just few weeks ago decided to give senior staff in Asia a huge incentive boost, raising salaries by as much as double. At the end of the day it’s up to you, Mr. or Ms. Talent — what do you really want? More money? Or a more comfortable working environment? Remember the old saying: you cannot have your cake and eat it.
And how can we forget Citibank, once the world’s largest financial services provider? The U.S. banking giant is now apparently paying more attentions to the fast growing rich Chinese customers and bigger Chinese corporate. The bank wants to double personnel in China to 10,000 over three years, according to a report by Japan’s business daily Nikkei on November 25.
When the news about Citibank’s hiring plan in China came out, Chinese netizens showed some doubts about it. They asked online if Citibank can afford competitive compensations in China like what they offer Citi staff in the West. To work for a foreign bank in China is no longer something a young graduate may be really proud of. In terms of payroll, you should not be surprised to see a junior clerk at Bank of China in Shanghai earns roughly 5,000 yuan (750 U.S. dollar) per month, even more than what his peer can get at Standard Chartered in the country’s financial hub.
On the other hand, it’s certainly a good thing to see the financial world recovering. Nobody wants to see another year of market panic in 2011. However, let’s hope the pace of expansion is a reasonable one.
You get more staff and you focus on better service quality better, right? Oops! To be honest, I haven’t received a call from my HSBC account manager for almost a year, and I only learned from the online banking system that my account manager has changed twice in the past six months.
Of course, I’m just one of many among its small clients in Hong Kong.

George Chen is a Reuters editor and columnBy George Chen

By George Chen

By George Chen
The opinions expressed are the author’s own.

As we enter the last few weeks of 2010, we’re gladdened to hear news of increased hiring in Asia, in particular in China – suggesting a promising business outlook for the coming year. Otherwise, why bother hiring?

On November 24, Barclays Wealth, a unit of British banking giant Barclays, outlined an ambitious expansion plan to double the number of private bankers in Asia and quadruple its assets under management in the region over the next four years. In addition, Barclays is going to set up a booking center in Hong Kong to get even closer to its top-end China clients.

This is not Barclays’ first attempt to grab talent from rivals this year. Its aggressive hiring plan has already raised tensions with Morgan Stanley in the equities, foreign exchange trading and investment banking arenas.

Just a few months ago, Barclays successfully lobbied a number of China-focused M&A bankers in Asia to defect from Morgan Stanley. Such moves, especially for a group of people rather than one or two over a few months, caused quite a buzz in Hong Kong’s financial community at the time. This time, Barclays wants to snag more private banking and asset management professionals. Who should be watching out?

In Asia, smaller banks such as Standard Chartered and DBS Group are furiously expanding, with more wealth likely to be generated in the region powered by the economies of China, India and Indonesia.

Even market leader HSBC is trying hard to expand its private banking team to further consolidate its position in Asia.

Have you seen the hiring ads posted all over Hong Kong? These banks are usually believed to offer less competitive compensation than rivals such as Barclays and Goldman Sachs, which are known for more generous payrolls, but also for longer working hours and higher pressure in the office.

No wonder HSBC just a few weeks ago decided to give senior staff in Asia a huge incentive boost, raising salaries by as much as double. At the end of the day it’s up to you, Mr. or Ms. Talent — what do you really want? More money? Or a more comfortable working environment? Remember the old saying: you cannot have your cake and eat it too.

And how can we forget Citibank, once the world’s largest financial services provider? The U.S. banking giant is now apparently paying more attention to the fast growing rich Chinese customers and bigger Chinese companies. The bank wants to double personnel in China to 10,000 over three years, according to a report by Japan’s business daily Nikkei on November 25.

When the news about Citibank’s hiring plan in China came out, Chinese netizens showed some skepticism. They asked online if Citibank can afford competitive compensation in China similar to what they offer Citi staff in the West. To work for a foreign bank in China is no longer something a young graduate necessarily covets ahead of other opportunities. In terms of payroll, you should not be surprised to see a junior clerk at Bank of China in Shanghai earning roughly 5,000 yuan (750 U.S. dollar) per month, even more than what his peer can get at Standard Chartered in the country’s financial hub.

On the other hand, it’s certainly a good thing to see the financial world recovering. Nobody wants to see another market panic in 2011. Let’s just hope the pace of expansion is reasonable.

Higher salaries means banks attract better people and can offer better quality service, right? Oops! To be honest, I haven’t received a call from my HSBC account manager for almost a year, and I only learned from the online banking system that my account manager has changed twice in the past six months.

Of course, I’m just one of many among its small clients in Hong Kong.

George Chen is a Reuters editor and columnist based in Hong Kong.

Photo: The HSBC headquarters is reflected in a commercial building in Hong Kong January 18, 2009. REUTERS/Bobby Yip

COMMENT

china is booming, bull market coming soon?? who knows??

KBT

Posted by arrowanartg | Report as abusive
  •