Olmert exit excites strong feelings in Israeli media

July 31, 2008

watching-olmert-on-television-in-jerusalem.JPG“The right step,” Israel’s most popular news daily screamed in red letters on Thursday across a front-page photo showing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, his back turned, after he announced plans to resign.
Olmert’s announcement on Wednesday triggered bold headlines and even bolder commentaries in the daily Yedioth Ahronoth in a climax to months of tensions over corruption scandals.

In a country of news junkies where emotions are raw and debate as hot as a mid-summer’s day, Israeli dailies typically give expression to pent-up feelings almost as much as they seek to inform.
Global concerns about the future of Middle East peace talks were not the main focus. Speculating over the political impact of Olmert’s downfall was more the order of the day.
“He couldn’t take it any more,” read the headline over a column on Yedioth’s front page by Eitan Haber, a former aide to the late Yitzhak Rabin, once a rival of Olmert’s felled by an Israeli rightist assassin who opposed peace talks.
“Olmert died in the war and was buried by the investigations,” Yedioth commentator Nahum Barnea wrote in another piece, referring to Olmert’s censure by an official panel for his handling of a 2006 war in Lebanon.
Some Israeli writers praised the dignified manner in which Olmert delivered his statement, quietly vowing to step aside and looking uncharacteristically humble in a speech broadcast live over radio and television.

Olmert protested his innocence, but his remarks bore little of the traditional mudslinging common in Israel’s fractious politics. “He lost with honour,” wrote Sima Kadmon, taking an unusually deferential tone.
In her article entitled “Not so fast,” Kadmon, a veteran political journalist, wrote the complex political manoeuvring needed to form a new government or to hold an election may result in Olmert remaining in office for months to come.

Under Israeli law, Olmert stays on as caretaker leader for the weeks or months it could take to form a new government or hold an election. “Olmert has announced the end of his political career, but the ending may drag on, and he could end up staying on as premier through next February or March,” Kadmon wrote.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

So, who’s next?

Israel, please be careful of who steps in, and watch out for Mr. Obama, that’s for sure.

Posted by Annonymous | Report as abusive

Regardless of whose next, Israel’s goal remains the same: to exterminate the Palestinians people. It is a Holocaust in installments

Israeli politics is so predictable. The IDF simply want a Prime Minister to prove his ‘manhood’ by allowing them to slaughter more Palestinian civilians and bomb refugee camps. I guess they have a fetish for stuffing their jock strap

Posted by Nu’man El-Bakri | Report as abusive

I do hope for a smarter and tougher leader for Isreal. The enemies surrounding Israel have always advocated the death of Israel and its inhabitants[holocaust], while claiming the opposite. It will take a different kind of leader to stay ahead of those that would destroy it.

Posted by mike storch | Report as abusive

I think Israel should choose a man who does not want to start a war, especially with Iran. Demographics alone warrant you to change your views on the Middle East. Israel can no longer afford to invade countries like Lebanon, ’82 & ’06, with impunity. They no longer have that leverage and if Israel can have nuclear leverage and has attacked and invaded so many coutries, Egypt ’56 & ’67, Lebanon ’82 & ’06 then Iran can argue the same. Its time to put down the rhetoric, end the occupation and live in harmony with the Muslims, as was in Spain during the Middle Ages and in Jerusalem, before ’48. It is only when you imposed your yourselves on the local people after ’48 that the Jewish-Muslim issue became a dilemma.

Posted by Muslim Engineer | Report as abusive