Saudi king basks in praise at UN interfaith forum

November 13, 2008

The price of oil may have dropped by more than half in recent weeks but the Saudi petrodollar appears to have lost none of its allure, judging by the procession of very important visitors to the New York Palace Hotel this week and to the U.N. General Assembly. With President George W. Bush in the lead, they have all come to present their compliments to King Abdullah, the Saudi ruler, who has turned the Manhattan hotel and the world body into an extension of his court, complete, it would seem, with a Majlis to receive petitioners.

Naturally, all the VIPs visiting him are eager to congratulate his majesty on his interfaith initiative, a gathering of religious and political leaders which took place  this week under the auspices of the United Nations. The meeting has attracted extravagant praise from, among others, Tony Blair, the former British Prime Minister,  and Shimon Peres,  the veteran Israeli president.

It is a fact that the king’s initiative is unprecedented and bold, taking place despite the displeasure of many influential religious clerics at home. It is also a fact that he is the first Saudi leader to have travelled to the Vatican, opening dialogue between the two largest religions.

But some commentators have pointed out the oddity that the king, who at home shares power with clerics of the puritanical Wahhabi Islam — which forbids any expression of other religious belief inside the kingdom, even of less austere forms of Muslim belief — should be so keen on interfaith dialogue abroad. Even Mr Blair admits coyly, in a newspaper article to coincide with the conference, that the king is also “the leader of a nation that critics say has been slow to modernise, with fraught consequences for the rest of the world”.

Critics also point out that the 15 Saudi hijackers who were among the 19 young Arab men who carried out the Sept 11, 2001 attacks against the Twin Towers and the Pentagon in the United States were partly influenced by the Wahhabi ideology.

But amid the financial turmoil sweeping international markets, the galaxy of world leaders chose to set aside their misgivings about Saudi Arabia’s domestic policies and freedom record. In their sight, they had one goal:

They are hoping Saudis will stump up cash to help the International Monetary Fund bail out emerging and developed countries in crisis.

Diplomats at the United Nations uncomfortably (and privately) acknowledge that Saudi Arabia’s wealth and its growing importance as a major contributor to the U.N. aid programmes — it recently gave $500 million to the World Food Programme — were behind the high turnout at the forum and lack of criticism of Saudi domestic policies.

4 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

It’s great these interfaith dialogues are going ahead. But I suspect that in more than a few cases the real reason for participating is to promote more hidden agendas. The words of President Asif Ali Zardari are concerning. What would constitute hate speech and religious discrimination? Could this be a case of offensive defense? There seems a trend to pitch some faiths as all loving and peaceful and others as full of hatred and bigotry, or at least any adherents that add an objective criticism about another. Hopefully I’m wrong!

But it appears true that truth is no longer considered, only the form of promotion that accompanies it.

Posted by Paul Christie | Report as abusive

“….and in other late breaking news today, the Ku Klux Klan has announced its sponsorship of a forum to discuss the problems of racial discrimination and hatred, saying that no race, white or black, should be subjected to bias, murder or lynching. NAACP president Ben Jealous and activist Reverend Al Sharpton have embraced the project as being good for race relations.”

Sound ridiculous? I think so, too. King Abdullah should clean his own house before even suggesting that the U.N. and other countries address the problem of religious freedom. This is a thinly veiled attempt by the OIC to suppress criticism of fundamentalist Islamic ideology.

Posted by EddietheInfidel | Report as abusive

Eddie has it figured out. At the Madrid Conference In July, a statement was issued which included a demand for national & international legislation to forbid criticism of Islam.

The demand was modeled on similar demands expressed in recent resolutions passed by the UNHRC & General Assembly. Another such resolution is pending. Details are posted at http://www.snooper.wordpress.com . Search for UN Bans Criticism of Islam.

In a situation when most of the global countries are in drastic economic downfall, it sounds unbelievable how and why does Saudi Arabia seem and look unaffected according?

Posted by A.R.Shams | Report as abusive