Business as usual as governments crumble in E.Europe

By Michael Winfrey
March 24, 2009

HUNGARYThe Czech opposition toppled Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek’s minority cabinet on Tuesday in a no-confidence vote. Three days earlier, Hungary’s prime minister said he would resign to let someone else pull that country out of its economic mire. Although serious, the developments were far from surprising if complaints about the economic crisis by anti-government parties and disgruntled voters were anything to go by.

But don’t blame it all on the economic crisis. Even with unemployment on the rise and housing prices tanking, wobbly governments in this region are nothing new and political mayhem is still far off.

In fact, only a handful of governments have ever won re-election in central and eastern Europe since the fall of communism, and none twice. A mid-term collapse is much more common. Now opposition parties ever on the lookout for opportunity — Topolanek’s no confidence vote on Tuesday was his fifth — have the deteriorating economy on their side. But that might also be a poison pill, particularly in countries like Hungary or the Baltics, where whoever holds sway will have to enact deep spending cuts to level out their imbalanced economies — spending cuts that won’t be popular among the voting public.

And who says those ousted from power actually step aside? Take the energetic Latvians. The country of 2.3 million has run through 14 governments since it quit the Soviet Union in 1991 in a revolving-door style of politics in which the same parties continue to cycle in and out of power. Its new prime minister is Valdis Dombrovskis, a former finance minister, who formed a six-party coalition including the four parties of the government that collapsed in February due to the economic crisis. One of his first actions was to approach the International Monetary Fund and the EU to let his cabinet spend more than originally agreed when Riga took a 7.5 billion euro rescue package last year, a move that has been received coolly by the Fund.

In Hungary, the soon-to-be-former leader of the ruling Socialist-led coalition, Ferenc Gyurcsany, sparked riots in 2006 when he let slip in a leaked tape that his party lied “in the morning… in the evening… and at night” about how bad the economy was so he could get re-elected. Now the economy is much worse off. Budapest had to agree to a $25 billion IMF-led bailout last year, under which it will have to make unpopular spending cuts. The economy will shrink by as much as 5 percent or more this year, according to some analysts. Gyurcsany tried to push through reforms but had to pull back due to public resentment. So now it’s time for a change in government, right? Wrong. Although Gyurcsany won’t be in the driving seat, his Socialists are working on a government with their former ruling partners the Free Democrats. The Free Democrats have called for strict budget prudence, which is exactly what the IMF and economists have prescribed for years, while Gyurscsany will remain the head of his party, with the potential to maintain some power behind the scenes. But the question is how viable any state spending cuts will be with budget revenues plummeting along with growth.

Topolanek’s case is also nothing new. The Czechs haven’t had a strong majority government since 1996, which still didn’t stop them from attracting billions of dollars in foreign direct investment, joining NATO and the EU, enjoying growth of 5 percent for several years running, and keeping their budget relatively in check. And even after losing Tuesday’s no-confidence vote, Topolanek, like Gyurcsany, will seek a new mandate for his party as well. Analysts say there’s only one way out of the situation for “super-deficit” countries like Hungary and Latvia, and that is to cut back. The Social Democrats who toppled Topolanek will want to spend more on social sectors if they can take power, but how far will they be able to go when tax revenues are falling with growth?

4 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

I am an American living in the Czech Republic for 10 years. I’ve seen governments come and go, but this particular collapse shows the absolute immaturity and irresponsibility of Czech political parties, namely the CSSD and KSCM (social democrats and Communist parties). Their sole intent was to bring the ruling Civic Democrats down as soon as possible in order to ride the wave of support that CSSD won in regional elections back in January. Parties here have a tendancy of losing support very quickly based on people’s whims. One politician promises lower taxes and the population sways towards him. The next week another politician promises free doughnuts (seriously, this is the CSSD’s official symbol) and the population swings their way. There is no loyalty when it comes to parties. It largely sways one way or the other based largely on whims. Only the Communists have a fiercely loyal backing, but as pensioners die, their numbers are in decline. Not surprisingly, young idealists without good jobs, or any job at all, also back the KSCM.

They are not interested in the EU, or anything that does not concern their personal agenda. This can be said for an politician. The difference here is that Czech politicans are willing to sabotage even successful governments for the sake of pushing through personal agendas. Topolanek’s no angel, but at least he had the backing of many EU MEPs and is considered to be largely liked, if not charismastic. Jiri Paroubek, the opposition leader has about as much charisma as a wooden plank and is deeply hated, not just disliked, by the Civic Democrats. I only hope the reverberations around the EU will be enough to wake the nation up and force them to grow up.

Posted by Sanan Phutrakul | Report as abusive

non-confidence vote is not because of recession. Czech Republic has absolutely health banks, there are only 0,1 % of debts in forgein currency. It doesn’t make any sense to compare it with Hungary.These two countries are both in Europe..It really doesn’t mean that they have both real problems..Hungary does, Czech Republic doesn’t.

Posted by Ond?ej Do?kal | Report as abusive

Yes, that it true, this has nothing to do with the world crisis. This is only about the fight between Czech political parties who care only about themselves getting to power and not about the nation’s good. Topolanek is not perfect, but he is one of the better choices… Those communists and social democrats back in the Czech Republic are just real pain. But this is democracy, so we have to accept it.

Posted by Tomas Dolezel | Report as abusive

The commentators are building an argument to suggest the people of Eastern Europe are not prepared or suited for democracy. I have long thought the same of my fellow country in the U.S.. Our last statesman as president, George Washington, stated in his farewell address to the nation after the completion of his second term “Political parties are the rankest form of evil. They misrepresent and distort the positions of others so as to further consolidate their own power”. Not much has changed in 200 years.

Posted by Anubis | Report as abusive