<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EU holds hearings, but who&#8217;s listening?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/global/2010/01/12/eu-holds-hearings-but-whos-listening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/global/2010/01/12/eu-holds-hearings-but-whos-listening/</link>
	<description>Beyond the World news headlines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:06:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HBC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/global/2010/01/12/eu-holds-hearings-but-whos-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-15734</link>
		<dc:creator>HBC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/global/?p=7062#comment-15734</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t really about the story as such, so much as about who covered it - innit? 

Got better coverage at
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/baptism-of-fire-for-eus-foreign-affairs-supremo-1864813.html

Besides, if you want to go there, I wouldn&#039;t call that grey suit &quot;smart&quot;. Looks more like vintage C&amp;A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t really about the story as such, so much as about who covered it &#8211; innit? </p>
<p>Got better coverage at<br />
<a href='http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/baptism-of-fire-for-eus-foreign-affairs-supremo-1864813.html'>http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/ europe/baptism-of-fire-for-eus-foreign-a ffairs-supremo-1864813.html</a></p>
<p>Besides, if you want to go there, I wouldn&#8217;t call that grey suit &#8220;smart&#8221;. Looks more like vintage C&amp;A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
