Modern form of bank robbery?

February 2, 2010

Germany has signalled it is ready to pay a thief who stole secret bank data in Switzerland in order to collect a small fortune in taxes and fines for tax evasion. According to media reports, the data may relate to money held by 1,500 Germans dodging taxes by hiding their money in Swiss bank accounts.
GERMANY/
But is it right for a state based on the rule of law to pay for stolen data? Is it a question of the ends justifying the means (exitus acta probat)? Or is it simply a modern form of bank robbery, like a Swiss lawmaker called it so colorfully on Tuesday?

It’s a question that has caused a stir on both sides of the German-Swiss border. Do two wrongs make a right? Can stolen data be used as evidence in court? Or is acceptable for a state to reward a thief in the pursuit of the greater good of fighting tax evasion — seen as a more serious crime?

Germans understandably have a deep suspicion about invasion of privacy after their ominous past experience with the Nazi’s Gestapo and the East German Stasi security police.  And Switzerland has historical hang ups about about Germany. There have been spirited debates on the moral pros and cons of the latest immoral offer for days.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble have said they’re in principle willing to pay an informant a reported 2.5 million euros for the bank data from Switzerland that could lead to more than 100 million euros for state coffers. The issue has has dominated newspaper headlines and TV bulletins in both countries for days.

That’s all good news for Germany’s fiscal health as it has prompted a wave of Germans with money stashed in Switzerland to come clean, as the Berlin newspaper TAZ noted today: “The mere talk about the Swiss tax data will be lucrative for the state. Those who are nervous and turn themselves in can still avoid criminal punishment but will nevertheless have to pay the taxes they’ve been evading.”

Reuters correspondent Albert Schmieder in Zurich talked to a banker today who told him: “The phones are ringing off the hook. A lot of Germans are quaking in their boots.” An opinion poll published in Germany on Tuesday found 57 percent of the public  in favour of paying the thief to go after the tax dodgers. Spiegel online noted that newspaper editorials in Germany are saying “the days of the numbered Swiss account are, well, numbered.”

But the Stuttgarter Zeitung newspaper warned that the government’s readiness to deal with a criminal for stolen bank data in this case as well as a similar case involving Liechtenstein two years years ago had created a new market for “Steuerdatenhandel” — trading tax data. The Boersen-Zeitung business daily called it a seedy business and compared it to the narcotics trade. “Der Staat als Dealer” (The state as a dealer) it wrote. “The end does not justify the means in a state based upon the rule of law,” Boersen-Zeitung wrote.

Perhaps the most entertaining comparison was made today by Pirmin Bischof, a Swiss lawmaker. As my colleague Madeline Chambers reported here, Bischof said: “This is a new form of bank robbery. Before you had to go to the bank and get hold of the money with a weapon. Today you can do it electronically by stealing data. This should not be allowed in a country based on the rule of law.”

PHOTO – Chancellor Angela Merkel holds a collector’s edition of Two-Euro coins during a presentation of the newly designed Two-Euro coin in Berlin, January 29, 2010.  REUTERS/Tobias Schwarz

4 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

American here. Really sick of the fundamental point of these situations being lost in all of these semantic arguments.

IT IS AN AGGREGIOUS AND REPREHENSIBLE OFFENCE TO EVADE TAXES BY FUNNELING MONEY TO A FOREIGN ACCOUNT.

The vast majority of these transactions are being made by the extremely wealthy.

Personal freedom and privacy are the foundations of modern society. But those that would exploit those values to manipulate the law are absolutely EVIL.

I’m sick of wealthy people and big corporations getting away with these sorts of practices at the expense of the tax-PAYER.

The Swiss government has been a front for big money laundering and tax evasion for DECADES.

Everyone knows that.

Posted by WildTurkey | Report as abusive

American here also. Irs really very simple, “It takes a thief to catch a thief” because a thief knows how a thief thinks and acts.

Posted by nico | Report as abusive

if we knowingly bought stolen property, we would go to jail.

Posted by bowater | Report as abusive

Just print that info & let the perspective localities handle it.
The person with the info that tries to blackmail someone is liable for extorsion.
This is the same as taking personal stats off of your PC & selling it to the highest bidder.
Kind of like Spam.

Dash

Posted by Dash496 | Report as abusive