<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Gun economics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2008/12/08/top-gun-economics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2008/12/08/top-gun-economics/</link>
	<description>Insights behind the investment headlines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2008/12/08/top-gun-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/?p=587#comment-972</guid>
		<description>5 billion for a corrupt corporation in need of bail out, or 5 billion for a new aircraft carrier? I&#039;ll take the shiny new boat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 billion for a corrupt corporation in need of bail out, or 5 billion for a new aircraft carrier? I&#8217;ll take the shiny new boat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2008/12/08/top-gun-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/?p=587#comment-964</guid>
		<description>The main menace in these days are terrorists. Therefore, why would you need to invest in a carrier?? It won&#039;t save you from promt terrorist attack!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main menace in these days are terrorists. Therefore, why would you need to invest in a carrier?? It won&#8217;t save you from promt terrorist attack!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2008/12/08/top-gun-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/?p=587#comment-962</guid>
		<description>Gene, 

I agree w/ you 100%. The 11 US acc battle groups are obsolete &amp; vulnerable. They also reflect huge legacy &amp; operating costs. If analysed using the objective metrics of business, they would fail analysis.

These are the 21st century floating naval maginot lines. There&#039;s just too many egos wrapped around these slow boats &amp; their support groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene, </p>
<p>I agree w/ you 100%. The 11 US acc battle groups are obsolete &amp; vulnerable. They also reflect huge legacy &amp; operating costs. If analysed using the objective metrics of business, they would fail analysis.</p>
<p>These are the 21st century floating naval maginot lines. There&#8217;s just too many egos wrapped around these slow boats &amp; their support groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Strong</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2008/12/08/top-gun-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/?p=587#comment-959</guid>
		<description>Aircraft carriers have probably already become obsolete
due to modern missile development. This has not yet
been acknowledged by those superpowers capable of building
and operating these monster targets as we have not yet
had a war between nations with carriers and nations with
sufficient modern missile capacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aircraft carriers have probably already become obsolete<br />
due to modern missile development. This has not yet<br />
been acknowledged by those superpowers capable of building<br />
and operating these monster targets as we have not yet<br />
had a war between nations with carriers and nations with<br />
sufficient modern missile capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
