<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No black tulip bulbs, no black swans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2008/12/10/no-black-tulip-bulbs-no-black-swans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2008/12/10/no-black-tulip-bulbs-no-black-swans/</link>
	<description>Insights behind the investment headlines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Kemmish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2008/12/10/no-black-tulip-bulbs-no-black-swans/comment-page-1/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kemmish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/?p=600#comment-973</guid>
		<description>To all mathematicians save one currently popular one, the phrase &quot;black swan&quot; has always meant the exact opposite of what it now means in the press.

A black swan was a idle curiosity:  something had no reason not to exist, and whose nonexistence could only be proved by exhaustive enumeration; conversely, the discovery that such did creatures did exist would not require any rule books to be thrown out, and would only appear to be a major scientific discovery to non-scientists.

I believe the &quot;black swan problem&quot; is discussed in Russell&#039;s Principia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all mathematicians save one currently popular one, the phrase &#8220;black swan&#8221; has always meant the exact opposite of what it now means in the press.</p>
<p>A black swan was a idle curiosity:  something had no reason not to exist, and whose nonexistence could only be proved by exhaustive enumeration; conversely, the discovery that such did creatures did exist would not require any rule books to be thrown out, and would only appear to be a major scientific discovery to non-scientists.</p>
<p>I believe the &#8220;black swan problem&#8221; is discussed in Russell&#8217;s Principia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
