<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sparks still flying over Harbin Electric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2011/11/09/sparks-still-flying-over-harbin-electric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2011/11/09/sparks-still-flying-over-harbin-electric/</link>
	<description>Insights behind the investment headlines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:50:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shortscrewed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2011/11/09/sparks-still-flying-over-harbin-electric/comment-page-1/#comment-4622</link>
		<dc:creator>shortscrewed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/?p=4636#comment-4622</guid>
		<description>Will muddy waters go down for their manipulation on SNOFF? 

If so who will be the next manipulator to go down? 

Appears Alfred Little is already in the process.

Then Absaroka, Glaucus, Citron, Kerrisdale, Jadestone, and Richard X Roe? Why wouldn&#039;t the investors go one by one down the assembly line and do as they did. Seems to be a no brainer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will muddy waters go down for their manipulation on SNOFF? </p>
<p>If so who will be the next manipulator to go down? </p>
<p>Appears Alfred Little is already in the process.</p>
<p>Then Absaroka, Glaucus, Citron, Kerrisdale, Jadestone, and Richard X Roe? Why wouldn&#8217;t the investors go one by one down the assembly line and do as they did. Seems to be a no brainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
