Comments on: “Dog-Eared” debt and the IMF’s sovereign restructuring ideas http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2014/01/31/dog-eared-debt-and-the-imfs-sovereign-restructuring-ideas/ Insights behind the investment headlines Wed, 16 Nov 2016 21:43:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: bbw cuckold http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2014/01/31/dog-eared-debt-and-the-imfs-sovereign-restructuring-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-195625 Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:05:25 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/?p=10616#comment-195625 I value the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

]]>
By: www.parismusic.co.uk http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2014/01/31/dog-eared-debt-and-the-imfs-sovereign-restructuring-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-194870 Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:19:23 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/?p=10616#comment-194870 Thank you for your post.Really thank you! Really Cool.

]]>
By: rental mobil murah di surabaya http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2014/01/31/dog-eared-debt-and-the-imfs-sovereign-restructuring-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-194859 Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:23:46 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/?p=10616#comment-194859 Looking forward to reading more. Great blog.Much thanks again. Awesome.

]]>
By: GermanHoldout http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2014/01/31/dog-eared-debt-and-the-imfs-sovereign-restructuring-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-184291 Sat, 01 Feb 2014 14:49:42 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/?p=10616#comment-184291 The Argument “If the U.S. courts uphold the complainant’s position, negative consequences will be felt by the U.S. and the rest of the world. Sovereign debt restructurings will be virtually impossible in the future.”

It is not true because, after Argentina’s 2001 Default all bonds imply the Collective Action Clause (CAC) A collective Action clause (CAC) allows a supermajority of bondholders (75%) to agree to a debt restructuring that is legally binding on all holders of the bond, including those who vote against the restructuring.

BUT, This CAC is NOT implied in Argentina’s defaulted old bonds! Accordingly, Argentina MUST fulfill the bond contracts and repay the debt to the holdouts!

]]>
By: GermanHoldout http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2014/01/31/dog-eared-debt-and-the-imfs-sovereign-restructuring-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-184290 Sat, 01 Feb 2014 14:41:49 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/?p=10616#comment-184290 Argentina’s nightmare default, this since 2002 ongoing HORROR must finally have an end!
We, the holdouts, have been suffering for more than a decade!!
Since 2002, Argentina has not paid a cent to the holdouts!

Beyond the U.S. Hedge Funds there are still tens of thousands retail Holdouts worldwide, most of them from Italy and Germany.

Most of the Holdouts are “before default buyer”, who have bought their bonds at an average of 100% or even over.
President Kirchner (a beautiful woman) should solve the holdout problem.

President Obama and the IMF should help and talk to President Kirchner to end Argentina’s Horror-Default.

Probably, also the US Court wants negotiations, and that is why, they STILL left the “stay” to give time for negotiations.

A reconciliation with the holdouts would improve Argentina’s ratings, initiate a firework of investments and also cheaper credits for argentine companies.

Argentina clearly has the capacity to repay the debt to the holdouts after more than a decade! The outstanding debt is only approximately 12 Billion. (incl. accrued interest) It is not much for the 3. largest economy in South America.

If Argentina and the holdouts made NOW A BINDING AGREEMENT with respect to the “time after” (end of the “Rights Upon Future Offers (RUFO) clause in December 2014), seizure risks and a technical Default would be immediately averted. Argentina could immediately return to the capital market and thus Argentina could refinance the payments to the holdouts, without using reserves.

Holdouts want a simple, clear, secure and an ACCEPTABLE solution.

Holdouts DO NOT want such exotic financial constructs, as they were the swap conditions in 2005 and 2010, with an exorbitant Haircut, with many new bonds, with only Discount bonds above $50000, GDP Warrants etc.,and with maturities in the eternity. Such “shares like” financial constructs are inacceptable.

A swap from the defaulted old bonds to new bonds is unacceptable also for tax reasons. In Germany, for example, if you accepted a swap, then you would have to pay for the new bonds 30% extra tax…

Following simple conditions might be acceptable for the Holdouts on the basis of the old bonds.(Without swapping from old to new bonds, also because of tax reason)

– at the latest, on 01/01/2015 (end of RUFO clause) Argentina should repay in CASH 100% of the nominal value of the defaulted bonds, which became due before 2015.

– for the accrued interest between 2002-2015´Argentina should emit new bonds with 50% discount, and with a maturity of 5 years.

]]>