Poland, the lonely inflation targeter
Is the National Bank of Poland (NBP) the last inflation-targeting central bank still standing?
The bank shocked many today with a quarter point rate rise, naming stubbornly high inflation as the reason, and signalling that more tightening is on its way. The NBP has sounded hawkish in recent weeks but few had actually expected it to carry through its threat to raise rates. Economic indicators of late have been far from cheerful – just hours after the rate rise, data showed Polish car production slumped 30 percent in April from year-ago levels. PMI numbers last week pointed to further deterioration ahead for manufacturing. And sitting as it does on the euro zone’s doorstep, Poland will be far more vulnerable than Brazil or Russia to any new setback in Greece. Its action therefore deserves praise, says Benoit Anne, head of emerging markets strategy at Societe Generale.
(Poland’s central bank) is one of the last orthodox inflation-targeting central banks in the global emerging market central bank universe. They are taking action because they are seeing inflation creeping up and have decided to be proactive.
The rate rise is especially notable given many central banks in developing countries appear effectively to have surrendered their inflation-fighting mandate. Nowhere is the push for lower interest rates more pronounced than in Brazil where the government last week announced plans to scrap fixed-rate savings deposits in a move that is seen paving the way for more agressive rate cuts. Clearly there is tolerance here for higher inflation, which will still end 2012 well above target.
But many analysts such as Manik Narain at UBS consider Poland’s decision a high-risk one given the growth issues. Narain sees it possibly motivated by the need to signal Poland will not welcome further currency weakness (the zloty like most emerging currencies has shed much of its early-2012 gain) Therefore a prolonged monetary tightening cycle is unlikely, he says. Indeed many reckon the NBP may find itself, like the European Central Bank last year, reversing an ill-considered rate rise. Analysts at Capital Economics write:
If we are right in expecting growth and inflation to slow by more than most expect over the second half of this year then this may well be the NBP’s “ECB moment”. Recall that having hiked rates twice in the first half of 2011, the ECB was forced to start loosening policy once again by November as the economy weakened. In Poland’s case, we think there is a good chance that today’s rate hike will be reversed by the end of the year.
Where will the FDI flow?
For years the four mighty BRIC nations have grabbed increasing shares of world investment flows. But the coming years may not be so kind. These countries bring up the bottom of the Economic Freedom Index (EFI) for 2012. Compiled by Washington D.C.-based think-tank The Heritage Foundation the EFI measures 10 freedoms — from property rights to entrepreneurship – and according to a note out today from RBS economists, there is a strong positive link between a country’s EFI score and the amount of FDI (foreign direct investment) it can secure. So the more “free” a country, the more FDI inflows it can expect to receive — that’s what an RBS analysis of 2002-2008 investment flows shows.
So back to the BRICs. Or BRICS if you add in South Africa (part of the political grouping though not yet included in the BRIC investment concept used by fund managers). The following graphic shows Russia languishing at the bottom of the EFI, China just above Russia and India third from bottom. Brazil is sixth from bottom while South Africa ranks two places higher.
At the other end of the spectrum is tiny Singapore. Its EFI score is double that of Russia and between 2002-2008 it attracted FDI equivalent to 50 percent of its economy. Russia in contrast saw negative net FDI (outflows exceeded inflows)
What comes next will be interesting. China grabbed the most FDI in absolute terms in the past decade (around $1.3 trillion or almost half the $2.1 trillion flows to the 21 leading EMs) but RBS notes this is slowing. That’s because China’s low-value manufacturing base is becoming less competitive relative to the rest of Asia and stringent restrictions remain in place in many sectors. Corruption, red tape and general business-unfriendliness prevail. ”The decreasing allure of China from a manufacturing perspective means the country is at risk of suffering a decrease in FDI inflows in coming years,” RBS writes. The bank also notes the nature of FDI into China is changing: half the 2011 flows went to real estate.
On the other BRICS:
Three snapshots for Thursday
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits slipped 2,000 to a seasonally adjusted 386,000, the Labor Department said. The prior week’s figure was revised up to 388,000 from the previously reported 380,000.
The four-week moving average for new claims, considered a better measure of labor market trends, rose 5,500 to 374,750.
Brazil’s central bank raised its key interest rate for a fourth straight time on Wednesday as it seeks to rein in persistent inflation, and indicated more rate increases could be on the way soon. This follows a 50bps rate cut from India earlier in the week.
BRICS: future aid superpowers?
Britain’s aid programme for India hit the headlines this year, when New Delhi, much to the fury of the Daily Mail, described Britain’s £200 million annual aid to it as peanuts. Whether it makes sense to send money to a fast-growing emerging power that spends billions of dollars on arms is up for debate but few know that India has been boosting its own aid programme for other poor nations. A report released today by NGO Global Health Strategies Initiatives (GHSi) finds that India’s foreign assistance grew 10.8 percent annually between 2005 and 2010.
The actual sums flowing from India are, to use its own phrase, peanuts. The country provided $680 million in 2010. Compare that to the $3.2 billion annual contribution even from crisis-hit Italy. The difference is that Indian donations have risen from $443 million in 2005, while Italy’s have fallen 10 percent in this period, GHSi found. Indian aid has grown in fact at a rate 10 times that of the United States. Add to that Indian pharma companies’ contribution – the source of 60- 80 percent of the vaccines procured by United Nations agencies.
Other members of the BRICS group of developing countries are also stepping up overseas assistance, with a special focus on healthcare, the report said. BRICS leaders meet this week to ink a deal on setting up a BRICS development bank.
Here are the numbers for the other BRICS (according to GHSi report entitled ”How the BRICS are reshaping global health and development”)
*Brazil is estimated to have provided upto $1.2 billion, mostly to Latin America and Portuguese-speaking African nations such as Mozambique. That’s an annual increase of 20 percent since 2005
*Russia’s foreign aid amounted to $472 million in 2010, mostly to other ex-Soviet states and Africa, four times 2006 levels.
*South Africa brings up the rear with $143 million, up 8 percent a year since 2005. (Click the following graphic to enlarge)
Russia’s new Eurobond: what’s the fair price?
Russia’s upcoming dollar bond, the first in two years, should fly off the shelves. It’s good timing — elections are past, the world economy seems to be recovering and crucially for Russia, oil prices are over $125 a barrel. And the rise in core yields has massively tightened emerging markets’ yield premium to U.S. Treasuries, offering an attractive window to raise cash. Russia’s spread premium over Treasuries hit the narrowest levels in 7 months recently and despite some widening this week it is still some 75 basis points below end-2011 levels.
Initial indications from the ongoing roadshow are for a two-tranche bond with 10- and 20-year maturities, possibly raising a total of $3.5 billion.
But market bullishness notwithstanding, investors say Moscow should resist temptation to price the bond too high, a mistake it made during its last foray into global capital markets in April 2010. Fund managers have unpleasant memories of that deal, recalling that Russia unexpectedly tightened the yield offered by 25-28 bps, making the bond an expensive one for investors who had already placed bids. The bond price fell sharply once trading kicked off and yields across the Russian curve rose around 25-30 basis points. Jeremy Brewin, a fund manager at Aviva said:
Russia has a slightly disappointing reputation.. We all ended up paying a tighter spread than we expected. Everyone is concerned they will get pulled in too tight again.
James Croft, head of emerging debt trading at Mitsubishi-UFJ agrees:
The demand for Russian risk is such that getting this bond away should be no problem. The only impediment that could make the transaction harder is investors’ wariness, based on the negative experience of the last deal back in 2010.
Dear Ms. Rao,
A recent claim successfully put forth by the Russian Government before two French courts (see below) could have drastic financial implications for the Russian State’s budget, stemming from the existence of billions of unpaid russian sovereign debt.
We believe credit rating agencies and emerging debt managers should follow developments in this matter very closely.
The current investment grade ratings enjoyed by the Russian Federation are based on a negligent analysis of inaccurate financial data.
The public accounts of the Russian Federation’s financial position make no mention of (and therefore actively dissimulate) the existence of due debt issued or guaranteed by the Russian State prior to 1917.
It has been put forth to the French Senate (Sénat, Commission des Affaires Etrangères de la Défense et des Forces Armées, rapport no. 150 – 1997 – 1998, projet de loi relatif au règlement définitif des créances réciproques entre la France et la Russie, annexe au procès verbal de la séance du 3 décembre 1997) that the 1997 value of this debt was in excess of 40 billion US$.
If the leading credit rating agencies adjusted the Russian Federation’s public accounts, as they should, to include an additional liability of US$ 40 billion this would no doubt lead to a change in their opinion on that State’s capacity to repay debt, and so to the ratings they issue.
While credit rating agencies and the Russian Federation have both argued wrongly in the past, and still do, that debt issued or guaranteed by the Imperial Russian State is not a full faith and credit obligation of the Russian Federation, they may not be able to do so in the future because recent claims sucessfully put forth recently by the Russian Federation have drastically changed the situation.
By successfully claiming ownership, before two French courts (Tribunal de Grande Instance de Nice in 2009 and Cour d’Appel d’Aix en Provence in 2011), of the Orthodox Cathedral in Nice on the grounds that the building had been paid for out of the Imperial Russian State budget and that the Russian Federation was the successor governement to the Imperial Russian State, the Russian Federation has in fact asked the court to acknowledge what defaulted sovereign bondholders have been saying all along: that the Russian Federation is the successor government to the Imperial Russian State and as such is both entitled to claim its assets and bound to pay off Imperial Russia’s debt.
For more on the matter of negligent sovereign debt rating analysis, please visit our website at:
We thank you for your attention.
The Credit Rating Agency Observatory – CRAO
Fresh skirmishes in global currency war
Amid all the furious G7 money printing of recent years, Brazil was the first to sound the air raid siren in the “international currency war” back in 2010 and it continues to cry foul over the past week. With its finance ministry issuing fresh warnings last night over hot-money flows being dropped by western economies on its unsuspecting exporters via currency speculation, Brazil’s central bank then set off its own defensive anti aircraft battery with a surprisingly deep interest rate cut late Wednesday. Having tried everything from taxes on hot foreign inflows to currency market intervention, they are braced for a long war and there’s little sign of the flood of cheap money from the United States, Europe and Japan ending anytime soon. So, if you can’t beat them, do you simply join them?
The prospect of a deepening of this currency conflict — essentially beggar-thy-neighbour devaluation policies designed to keep countries’ share of ebbing world growth intact — was a hot topic this week for Societe Generale’s long-standing global markets bear Albert Edwards. Edwards, who represent’s SG’s “Alternative View”, reckons the biggest development in the currency battle this year has been the sharp retreat of Japan’s yen and this could well drag China into the fray if global growth continues to wither later this year. He highlighted the Japan/China standoff with the following graphic of yen and yuan nominal trade-weighted exchange rates.
Edwards goes on to say that this could, in turn, create another explosive FX standoff between China and the United States if Beijing were to consider devaluation — the opposite of what the protectionist U.S. lobby has been screaming for for years.
“We have long stated that if the Chinese economy looks to be hard landing, as we believe it will, the authorities there will actively consider renminbi devaluation, despite the political consequences of such action.”
“Clearly, the US will not respond well if China chooses to devalue. But China might argue that as its reserves are now declining there is clear downward pressure on its currency and that, after all, the US has asked it to allow market forces to have more of an influence!”
Emerging beats developed in 2012
Robust growth from the emerging market basket in January was always going to be tough to beat, but research from February’s gains show just how strong these markets are performing against developed ones, and not just from the traditional BRICs either, research from S&P Indices shows.
Egypt has been a prime example. Following a bout of political unrest and subsequent removal of Hosni Mubarak after nearly 30 years in power, Egypt’s market returns have rocketed, climbing 15.3 percent in February on top of January’s 44.3 percent take-off.
Thailand, Chile, Turkey and Colombia are also on the to-watch list as these emerging lights have all flashed double-digit returns in the first two months of this year, while all twenty emerging markets included in the S&P data were up, gaining an average of 6.62 percent, making gains in the year-to-date a mouth-watering 18.95 percent.
Compare that with developed market returns of 4.6 percent in February, led by Nordic countries in particular Norway with (13.8 percent) in February, Denmark (13.5 percent) and Sweden (10.2 percent). Yet returns in developed markets were dragged down by Israel (-1.9 percent) and Greece (-2 percent). Overall developed markets grew 10.3 percent in the first two months of the year.
So taken together – equity markets have gained $1.6 trillion in February, which when added to January’s bullish run, clawing back all $3 trillion worth of losses in 2011 leading to the best start the S&P 500 has had since 1987.
Optimism should be checked, however. High oil prices supported by geopolitical pressure at the prospect of an Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities and subsequent knock-out of a 3.5 million barrel per day production of crude oil could start to have a negative effect on markets, while Europe still faces high levels of debt and the challenge of reducing deficits, which could create a drag on the growth of emerging economies.
S&P says:
Emerging market local bond rally has more legs
Just a month and half into 2012, emerging local currency bonds have already returned 9 percent, one of best performing asset classes. But the rally has further to go, says J.P. Morgan which runs the most widely used emerging debt indices. The bank is now predicting its benchmark local currency debt index, the GBI-EM, to end the year with returns of 16 percent, upping its original expectation for 11.9 percent.
There are several reasons for this bullishnesss. JPM’s latest client survey reveals investors’ positioning is still neutral, meaning there is potential for more gains. Cash inflows to EM local debt have been dwarfed this year by investments into dollar bonds, considered a safer, albeit lower-yielding asset than locally issued bonds. So when (and if) euro zone uncertainties abate, some of this cash is likely to make the switch.
Many emerging countries are still cutting interest rates, which will push down yields on short-dated bonds. Other countries may tolerate some more currency appreciation to dampen inflation, benefiting the currency side of the EM local bond trade. Above all, with all developed central banks intent on quantitative easing (Japan announced a surprise $130 billion worth of extra QE this week), the yield premium offered by emerging markets — the carry — is irresistible. On average the GBI-EM index offers a 4.5 percent yield pick up on U.S. Treasuries, JPM notes:
From an EM perspective there is little reason to fight the rising tide of monetary policy support in the near term. Comparisons to the 2009 global carry trade are unavoidable given the scope of G-4 central bank balance sheet expansion.
So far, around 70 percent of the gains posted by the GBI-EM index have been down to currency appreciation (see here). That could change going forward as some central banks may act to slow FX appreciation. That’s already been happening in Brazil. Gains from the duration trade — derived from interest rate cuts — are also more or less done, analysts reckon, because emerging central banks are more likely from here to keep interest rates on hold than to cut. J.P. Morgan adds:
While we look for approximately 7 percent in additional returns in the GBI-EM for the remainder of the year, the majority of this is due to carry (5 percent) while spiot FX returns should be muted at 1.9 percent and duration returns flat.
Brazil going Turkey? Not quite
Could Brazil be on the cusp of adopting a Turkish-style monetary policy, J.P. Morgan analysts ask.
Many central banks have of late been forced to scale back interest rate cuts (here’s something I wrote on this topic last week) but one, Brazil’s Banco Central, remains resolutely dovish.
After four rate cuts it seems determined to take the official Selic rate into single-digit territory. Aldo Mendes, a deputy governor at the bank, told investors in London last week that he was confident of meeting the 4.5 percent inflation target this year. Friday’s data showing annual inflation at an 11-month low of 6.22 percent should have given policymakers some more ammunition.
Yet it looks unlikely that inflation can fall this year to 4.5 percent — on average analysts expect 5.3 percent. That’s better than last year’s 6.5 percent but government plans for a spending binge to boost growth are bad news for the central bank’s target. Inflation expectations are steadily trending higher — analysts surveyed by the central bank predicted 2014 inflation above 4.5 percent for the first time last November and now this is close to 5 percent, JPM analysts note. The risk for the central bank is it will lose credibility if it insists on keeping policy loose in the face of rising inflation expectations. There is no “free lunch”, JPM says:
Lower rates could mean credibility costs and in turn higher inflation….It seems the BCB is losing credibility as we see changes in the market’s inflation expectations for the medium term. Taking that and our strong activity forecast from the second quarter onwards we now believe it will take much longer for inflation to converge to the middle of its target range. Therefore we are raising our inflation forecast to 5.5 percent in 2013 from 5 percent previously.
Check out the following graphic from JPM on inflation expectations in Brazil:
Interest rates in emerging markets – - harder to cut
Emerging market central banks and economic data are sending a message — interest rates will stay on hold for now. There are exceptions of course.
Indonesia cut rates on Thursday but the move was unexpected and possibly the last for some time. Brazil has also signalled that rate cuts will continue. But South Korea and Poland held rates steady this week and made hawkish noises. Peru and Chile will probably do the same.
The culprit that’s spoiling the party is of course inflation. Expectations that slowing growth will wipe out remaining price pressures have largely failed to materialise, leaving policymakers in a bind. Tensions over Iran could drive oil prices higher. Growth seems to be looking up in the United States.
On top of that, all the major central banks in the developed world are intent on flooding the world economy with cash and some of it will inevitably make its way to emerging nations. So while economies could do with a good dose of policy easing, most central banks cannot afford to let their guard down on inflation.
Take China where January inflation came in well above expectations on Thurday, with food prices up 10.5 percent on the year. Expect no cuts to the policy rate this year, warn analysts at RBC. Over in Seoul, Bank of Korea governor Kim Choong-soo said policymakers needed to be “on alert” for inflation risks and described inflation expectations as “considerably high.” The verdict from Barclays:
Taken together these comments reflect a tilt in concern towards inflation.
Most central banks in emerging Europe never had much room to cut rates anyway, exposed as they are to the euro zone malaise. But as my colleague Emily Kaiser wrote a week back, policy easing bets in Asia are also being trimmed.
