Is the price right? Many reckon that the sell off in emerging markets and growing disenchantment with the developing world’s growth story is lending fresh validity to the value-based investing model.
That’s especially so for the four BRIC economies, where shares have underperformed for years thanks either to an over-reliance on commodities, excessive valuations conferred by a perception of fast growth or simply dodgy corporate governance. Now with MSCI’s emerging equity index down 30 percent from 2007 peaks, prices are looking so beaten down that some players, even highly unlikely ones, are finding value.
Societe Generale’s perma-bear Albert Edwards is one. Okay, he still calls the bloc Bloody Ridiculous Investment Concept but he reckons that share valuations are inching into territory where some buying might just be justified. Edwards notes that it was ultra-cheap share valuations in the early 2000s that set the stage for the sector’s stellar gains over the following decade, rather than any turbo-charged economic growth rates. So if MSCI’s emerging equity index is trading around 10 times forward earnings, that’s a 30 percent discount to the developed index, the biggest in a very long time. And valuations are lower still in Russia and Brazil.
Value investing involves buying securities at a price that is deemed to be less than their intrinsic value. What Edwards is saying is that valuations are what matter in emerging markets, not their superior growth of their economies. So:
Despite more ongoing macro problems in EM-land a sub-10x forward PE looks reasonable in historical terms and seems very reasonable compared to QE inflated valuations of developed markets…there is much choppy water ahead for EM as China nears tilting into outright deflation and Bernanke sharpens his fangs and begins to suck the monetary blood out of the global economy and risk bubbles. Nevertheless BRICs might not now be the Bloody Ridiculous Investment Concept they once were.